Current state of djbdns

dE_logics · Advocate Joined: 02 Jan 2009 Posts: 2336 Location: $TERM

The project appears dead.. there's just 1 developer; so I fail to understand how can this be better than BIND.

But support multithreading right?
_________________
My blog

Jaglover · Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:14 am Post subject:

IMO it just works. I've been using it for ages. I fail to see why you call it dead. It builds under latest operating systems, sounds like very live to me.
_________________
My Gentoo installation notes.
Please learn how to denote units correctly!

cach0rr0 · Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:24 am Post subject:

remember the betamax?

better technology, nobody used it, so nobody bothered releasing content for it
_________________
Lost configuring your system?
dump lspci -n here | see Pappy's guide | Link Stash

dE_logics · Advocate Joined: 02 Jan 2009 Posts: 2336 Location: $TERM

Ok, so I'll try it out. Thanks for the opinion.
_________________
My blog

cach0rr0 · Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 6:44 am Post subject:

*shrug*

id opt for bind nowadays, but that's me. not djbdns's fault, but rather qmail's - after that experience i just wont touch anything the guy writes.
_________________
Lost configuring your system?
dump lspci -n here | see Pappy's guide | Link Stash