View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Chuckinator n00b
Joined: 28 May 2005 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
VStrider wrote: | Will OO2 compile with USE= -java ? |
Apparently, yes - I emerged it with USE="-java" without any problems: Code: | $ genlop -ti openoffice
* app-office/openoffice
Mon Oct 10 05:02:55 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-1.1.5
merge time: 3 hours, 30 minutes and 3 seconds.
Fri Oct 21 02:50:46 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
merge time: 4 hours, 51 minutes and 14 seconds.
Total builds: 2
Global build time: 8 hours, 21 minutes and 17 seconds.
Average merge time: 4 hours, 10 minutes and 38 seconds.
Info about currently installed ebuild:
* app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
Install date: Fri Oct 21 02:50:46 2005
USE="kde python zlib xml2 -curl -eds -gnome -java -ldap -mozilla -nas"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe" |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kyro n00b
Joined: 20 Dec 2002 Posts: 56 Location: Over here
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chuckinator wrote: |
Info about currently installed ebuild:
* app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
Install date: Fri Oct 21 02:50:46 2005
USE="kde python zlib xml2 -curl -eds -gnome -java -ldap -mozilla -nas"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe" |
(Emphasis mine). It actually compiled for you under x86_64? Might have to try that out, in that case.
I was under the impression that it wouldn't compile for amd64. _________________ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chuckinator n00b
Joined: 28 May 2005 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kyro wrote: | Chuckinator wrote: |
Info about currently installed ebuild:
* app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
Install date: Fri Oct 21 02:50:46 2005
USE="kde python zlib xml2 -curl -eds -gnome -java -ldap -mozilla -nas"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe" |
(Emphasis mine). It actually compiled for you under x86_64? Might have to try that out, in that case.
I was under the impression that it wouldn't compile for amd64. | No, I compiled it under x86 - I just have an AMD Athlon 64 processor. According to this thread, OpenOffice won't compile in a 64-bit environment until version 2.0.2. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Q-collective Advocate
Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 2071
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
codergeek42 wrote: | thesnowman wrote: | Yay! The icons don't look like s#%t anymore. | What do you mean by this? Does OO.org actually use your GNOME/KDE icon theme now? That would kick ass... |
Not theme, just a GTK/Qt look, afaik. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kyro n00b
Joined: 20 Dec 2002 Posts: 56 Location: Over here
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 7:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chuckinator wrote: | No, I compiled it under x86 - I just have an AMD Athlon 64 processor. According to this thread, OpenOffice won't compile in a 64-bit environment until version 2.0.2. |
Ahh, well that clears it up then. I always thought setting athlon64 had something to do with if it'd be doing 32- or 64-bit.
(darn OO.org people for making us poor 64-bit:ers have to wait for proper desktop integration ) _________________ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asiobob Veteran
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 Posts: 1375 Location: Bamboo Creek
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
When run a wizard in Writer, File, Wizards, Fax for an example. Does OO.o Writer claim that "important files are missing" ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Q-collective Advocate
Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 2071
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
When trying to emerge openoffice (source), I get this nice error:
Code: | Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
11 errors
12 warnings
BUILD FAILED
/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0/build/ooo680-m3/beanshell/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/BeanShell/build.xml:176: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.
Total time: 8 seconds
dmake: Error code 1, while making 'ANTBUILD'
'---* tg_merge.mk *---'
dmake: Error code 255, while making './unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/so_built_ooo_beanshell'
'---* tg_merge.mk *---'
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0/build/ooo680-m3/beanshell
make: *** [stamp/build] Fout 1
!!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 186, Exitcode 2
!!! Build failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mark_alec Bodhisattva
Joined: 11 Sep 2004 Posts: 6066 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Emerged the binary but it didn't pick up my kde icons |
|
Back to top |
|
|
suka Developer
Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 383
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
mark_alec wrote: | Emerged the binary but it didn't pick up my kde icons |
The binary doesn't have the kde-integration, if you want that you'll have to build it yourself with app-office/openoffice |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Q-collective Advocate
Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 2071
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
mark_alec wrote: | Emerged the binary but it didn't pick up my kde icons |
You'll need a little script.
Code: | #!/bin/bash
export OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP=kde
cd /usr/lib/openoffice/program
./soffice -
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
suka Developer
Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 383
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Q-collective wrote: | mark_alec wrote: | Emerged the binary but it didn't pick up my kde icons |
You'll need a little script.
Code: | #!/bin/bash
export OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP=kde
cd /usr/lib/openoffice/program
./soffice -
|
|
And what is this script supposed to do in respect to openoffice-bin? And why should you start openoffice directly instead of through the wrapper script? Also: Why do you cd to the program dir? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Q-collective Advocate
Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 2071
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
suka wrote: | Q-collective wrote: | mark_alec wrote: | Emerged the binary but it didn't pick up my kde icons |
You'll need a little script.
Code: | #!/bin/bash
export OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP=kde
cd /usr/lib/openoffice/program
./soffice -
|
|
And what is this script supposed to do in respect to openoffice-bin? And why should you start openoffice directly instead of through the wrapper script? Also: Why do you cd to the program dir? |
Try it to see it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mark_alec Bodhisattva
Joined: 11 Sep 2004 Posts: 6066 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Q-collective wrote: | Try it to see it? | Still just the default openoffice icons. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thesnowman Guru
Joined: 08 May 2003 Posts: 365 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Compile time on P4 2.8 with 1GB RAM:
Code: | # genlop -ti openoffice
* app-office/openoffice
Wed May 21 12:12:50 2003 >>> app-office/openoffice-1.0.3
merge time: 10 hours, 36 minutes and 45 seconds.
Wed Aug 25 18:44:03 2004 >>> app-office/openoffice-1.1.2
merge time: 4 hours, 42 minutes and 11 seconds.
Fri Oct 21 15:48:00 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
merge time: 6 hours, 25 minutes and 6 seconds.
Total builds: 3
Global build time: 21 hours, 44 minutes and 2 seconds.
Average merge time: 7 hours, 14 minutes and 40 seconds.
Info about currently installed ebuild:
* app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
Install date: Fri Oct 21 15:48:00 2005
USE="curl eds gnome java mozilla python zlib xml2 -kde -ldap -nas"
CFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -mtune=pentium4 -O2 -pipe"
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Matteo Azzali Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 1133
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
codergeek42 wrote: | thesnowman wrote: | Yay! The icons don't look like s#%t anymore. | What do you mean by this? Does OO.org actually use your GNOME/KDE icon theme now? That would kick ass... |
It KICKS!!!!!!
I don't know if it's native QT or gtk-QT (I'm using the gtk-qt-engine) but
my openoffice.org just uses linspire clear as all my desktop apps. _________________ Every day a new distro comes to birth. Every day a distro "eats" another.
If you're born distro, no matter what, start to run.
---- http://www.linuxprinting.org/ ---- http://tuxmobil.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Q-collective Advocate
Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 2071
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mark_alec wrote: | Q-collective wrote: | Try it to see it? | Still just the default openoffice icons. |
Oh, you want kde icons, I thought you just wanted Qt widgets |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zyzzyva100 Apprentice
Joined: 08 Aug 2005 Posts: 193
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ASIO_BOB wrote: | When run a wizard in Writer, File, Wizards, Fax for an example. Does OO.o Writer claim that "important files are missing" ? |
Yea, I noticed this too, guess they really don't have all the bugs worked out. I also get a similar error when I try to save a new file for the first time. It works, but I get 2 error messages first. It looks as though they changed the default paths for a bunch of stuff, and while the settings show the correct paths, and you can edit them all you like, a lot of the menus and some other basic things will not use what you configure, and seem to be hard coded to the old locations.
Guess 2.0.1 will be coming out soon. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Plastic l33t
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 649
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Zyzzyva100 wrote: | ASIO_BOB wrote: | When run a wizard in Writer, File, Wizards, Fax for an example. Does OO.o Writer claim that "important files are missing" ? |
Yea, I noticed this too, guess they really don't have all the bugs worked out. I also get a similar error when I try to save a new file for the first time. It works, but I get 2 error messages first. It looks as though they changed the default paths for a bunch of stuff, and while the settings show the correct paths, and you can edit them all you like, a lot of the menus and some other basic things will not use what you configure, and seem to be hard coded to the old locations.
Guess 2.0.1 will be coming out soon. |
Strange, I don't have this problem. Unfortunately I can't test anymore because I'm recompiling it right now because I forgot to set the gnome use flag. so...UGLY! Anyway, is there any reason the use flag is gnome rather than gtk2? Does this enable any other kind of significant integration? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zyzzyva100 Apprentice
Joined: 08 Aug 2005 Posts: 193
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not sure about the use flag, but I wonder if this is a result of having upgraded through all of the release candidates. I didnt have the problem with rc1 or 2, but started having it with rc3 and now the final build. I think the path names may have changed somewhere in there.
Maybe if I unmerge open office, remove all the files from the previous versions and re-emerge it the problem will go away. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sandcrawler Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 24 Mar 2003 Posts: 149 Location: SaintLouis, MO
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
More compile times...
Code: |
2.6.13-gentoo-r3 #3 Thu Oct 6 21:27:42 CDT 2005 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
2GB Ram
genlop -t openoffice
* app-office/openoffice
Fri Oct 21 03:01:52 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
merge time: 4 hours, 40 minutes and 27 seconds.
|
My laptop finished a full hour faster than my desktop. Gotta respect these -M processors...
Plus it's stable on here... Gonna have to troubleshoot ths one I guess... _________________ --
sandcrawler |
|
Back to top |
|
|
affan n00b
Joined: 25 Mar 2004 Posts: 23 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For some reason I was unable to build openoffice-2.0 from source and got some errors when compiling Java Beanshell it seems. It complained of ambiguous references for interface Type. I have attached the complete log for the build (scroll to the very end to see the errors). I am using Gentoo with sun-jdk-1.5.0_01.
Below are some examples of the kinds of errors I got.
Code: | /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0/build/ooo680-m3/beanshell
/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/BeanShell/src/bsh/ClassGeneratorUtil.java:137: referenc
e to Type is ambiguous, both class java.lang.reflect.Type in java.lang.reflect a
nd class bsh.org.objectweb.asm.Type in bsh.org.objectweb.asm match
this.superClassName = Type.getInternalName( superClass );
^
/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0/build/ooo680-m3/beanshell
/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/BeanShell/src/bsh/ClassGeneratorUtil.java:137: cannot f
ind symbol
symbol : method getInternalName(java.lang.Class)
location: interface java.lang.reflect.Type
this.superClassName = Type.getInternalName( superClass );
^
/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0/build/ooo680-m3/beanshell
/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/BeanShell/src/bsh/ClassGeneratorUtil.java:185: referenc
e to Type is ambiguous, both class java.lang.reflect.Type in java.lang.reflect a
nd class bsh.org.objectweb.asm.Type in bsh.org.objectweb.asm match
interfaceNames[i]=Type.getInternalName( interfaces[i] );
^
|
Do you need the complete log? here it is: http://www.cs.odu.edu/~aqureshi/torrent/temp_log.txt.gz |
|
Back to top |
|
|
suka Developer
Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 383
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
affan wrote: | For some reason I was unable to build openoffice-2.0 from source and got some errors when compiling Java Beanshell it seems. It complained of ambiguous references for interface Type. I have attached the complete log for the build (scroll to the very end to see the errors). I am using Gentoo with sun-jdk-1.5.0_01. |
openoffice won't build with java-1.5 (which is still hard masked) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lambada Apprentice
Joined: 31 Jul 2005 Posts: 157
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
I emerged openoffice-bin
I have dotted boxes instead of charachters.
What could be wrong?
Thanks _________________ Lambada |
|
Back to top |
|
|
affan n00b
Joined: 25 Mar 2004 Posts: 23 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
suka wrote: | affan wrote: | For some reason I was unable to build openoffice-2.0 from source and got some errors when compiling Java Beanshell it seems. It complained of ambiguous references for interface Type. I have attached the complete log for the build (scroll to the very end to see the errors). I am using Gentoo with sun-jdk-1.5.0_01. |
openoffice won't build with java-1.5 (which is still hard masked) |
So would it comple if I use the "-java" flag? Also do you know what does "mozilla" flag does? I am only curious if it adds plugin for the browser or something |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LubosD Apprentice
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Posts: 211 Location: Czech Republic
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have some grahphic glitches in both openoffice, openoffice-bin and wine too. GTK+ and QT apps are fine.
I have tried nvidia, nv and vesa driver and it is all the same... Any idea what's wrong?
Many items get partially black on hover and Close document ("X") has always inverted colors.
"Button" is black on hover (OO.org Base)
Inverted close button
Toolbar glitch on hover |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|