Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
OpenOffice.org 2.0.0 final released
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Chuckinator
n00b
n00b


Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 7:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

VStrider wrote:
Will OO2 compile with USE= -java ?

Apparently, yes - I emerged it with USE="-java" without any problems:
Code:
$ genlop -ti openoffice
 * app-office/openoffice

     Mon Oct 10 05:02:55 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-1.1.5
       merge time: 3 hours, 30 minutes and 3 seconds.

     Fri Oct 21 02:50:46 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
       merge time: 4 hours, 51 minutes and 14 seconds.


   Total builds: 2
   Global build time: 8 hours, 21 minutes and 17 seconds.
   Average merge time: 4 hours, 10 minutes and 38 seconds.

   Info about currently installed ebuild:

   * app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
   Install date: Fri Oct 21 02:50:46 2005
   USE="kde python zlib xml2 -curl -eds -gnome -java -ldap -mozilla -nas"
   CFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kyro
n00b
n00b


Joined: 20 Dec 2002
Posts: 56
Location: Over here

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 7:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chuckinator wrote:

Info about currently installed ebuild:

* app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
Install date: Fri Oct 21 02:50:46 2005
USE="kde python zlib xml2 -curl -eds -gnome -java -ldap -mozilla -nas"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe"


(Emphasis mine). It actually compiled for you under x86_64? Might have to try that out, in that case.
I was under the impression that it wouldn't compile for amd64. :?:
_________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chuckinator
n00b
n00b


Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 7:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kyro wrote:
Chuckinator wrote:

Info about currently installed ebuild:

* app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
Install date: Fri Oct 21 02:50:46 2005
USE="kde python zlib xml2 -curl -eds -gnome -java -ldap -mozilla -nas"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe"


(Emphasis mine). It actually compiled for you under x86_64? Might have to try that out, in that case.
I was under the impression that it wouldn't compile for amd64. :?:
No, I compiled it under x86 - I just have an AMD Athlon 64 processor. :D According to this thread, OpenOffice won't compile in a 64-bit environment until version 2.0.2.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Q-collective
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 2056

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 7:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

codergeek42 wrote:
thesnowman wrote:
Yay! The icons don't look like s#%t anymore.
What do you mean by this? Does OO.org actually use your GNOME/KDE icon theme now? That would kick ass...

Not theme, just a GTK/Qt look, afaik.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kyro
n00b
n00b


Joined: 20 Dec 2002
Posts: 56
Location: Over here

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 7:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chuckinator wrote:
No, I compiled it under x86 - I just have an AMD Athlon 64 processor. :D According to this thread, OpenOffice won't compile in a 64-bit environment until version 2.0.2.


Ahh, well that clears it up then. I always thought setting athlon64 had something to do with if it'd be doing 32- or 64-bit. :)

(darn OO.org people for making us poor 64-bit:ers have to wait for proper desktop integration :D )
_________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asiobob
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Posts: 1375
Location: Bamboo Creek

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When run a wizard in Writer, File, Wizards, Fax for an example. Does OO.o Writer claim that "important files are missing" ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Q-collective
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 2056

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When trying to emerge openoffice (source), I get this nice error:
Code:
Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
11 errors
12 warnings

BUILD FAILED
/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0/build/ooo680-m3/beanshell/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/BeanShell/build.xml:176: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.

Total time: 8 seconds
dmake:  Error code 1, while making 'ANTBUILD'
'---* tg_merge.mk *---'
dmake:  Error code 255, while making './unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/so_built_ooo_beanshell'
'---* tg_merge.mk *---'

ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0/build/ooo680-m3/beanshell
make: *** [stamp/build] Fout 1

!!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 186, Exitcode 2
!!! Build failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.

:(
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mark_alec
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 11 Sep 2004
Posts: 6066
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Emerged the binary but it didn't pick up my kde icons :cry:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
suka
Developer
Developer


Joined: 22 Apr 2002
Posts: 383

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mark_alec wrote:
Emerged the binary but it didn't pick up my kde icons :cry:


The binary doesn't have the kde-integration, if you want that you'll have to build it yourself with app-office/openoffice
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Q-collective
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 2056

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 11:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mark_alec wrote:
Emerged the binary but it didn't pick up my kde icons :cry:

You'll need a little script.
Code:
#!/bin/bash
export OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP=kde
cd /usr/lib/openoffice/program
./soffice -
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
suka
Developer
Developer


Joined: 22 Apr 2002
Posts: 383

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Q-collective wrote:
mark_alec wrote:
Emerged the binary but it didn't pick up my kde icons :cry:

You'll need a little script.
Code:
#!/bin/bash
export OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP=kde
cd /usr/lib/openoffice/program
./soffice -


And what is this script supposed to do in respect to openoffice-bin? And why should you start openoffice directly instead of through the wrapper script? Also: Why do you cd to the program dir?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Q-collective
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 2056

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

suka wrote:
Q-collective wrote:
mark_alec wrote:
Emerged the binary but it didn't pick up my kde icons :cry:

You'll need a little script.
Code:
#!/bin/bash
export OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP=kde
cd /usr/lib/openoffice/program
./soffice -


And what is this script supposed to do in respect to openoffice-bin? And why should you start openoffice directly instead of through the wrapper script? Also: Why do you cd to the program dir?

Try it to see it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mark_alec
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 11 Sep 2004
Posts: 6066
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Q-collective wrote:
Try it to see it?
Still just the default openoffice icons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thesnowman
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 May 2003
Posts: 365
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Compile time on P4 2.8 with 1GB RAM:
Code:
# genlop -ti openoffice
 * app-office/openoffice

     Wed May 21 12:12:50 2003 >>> app-office/openoffice-1.0.3
       merge time: 10 hours, 36 minutes and 45 seconds.

     Wed Aug 25 18:44:03 2004 >>> app-office/openoffice-1.1.2
       merge time: 4 hours, 42 minutes and 11 seconds.

     Fri Oct 21 15:48:00 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
       merge time: 6 hours, 25 minutes and 6 seconds.


   Total builds: 3
   Global build time: 21 hours, 44 minutes and 2 seconds.
   Average merge time: 7 hours, 14 minutes and 40 seconds.

   Info about currently installed ebuild:

   * app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
   Install date: Fri Oct 21 15:48:00 2005
   USE="curl eds gnome java mozilla python zlib xml2 -kde -ldap -nas"
   CFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -mtune=pentium4 -O2 -pipe"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Matteo Azzali
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 1133

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

codergeek42 wrote:
thesnowman wrote:
Yay! The icons don't look like s#%t anymore.
What do you mean by this? Does OO.org actually use your GNOME/KDE icon theme now? That would kick ass...

It KICKS!!!!!!
I don't know if it's native QT or gtk-QT (I'm using the gtk-qt-engine) but
my openoffice.org just uses linspire clear as all my desktop apps.
_________________
Every day a new distro comes to birth. Every day a distro "eats" another.
If you're born distro, no matter what, start to run.
---- http://www.linuxprinting.org/ ---- http://tuxmobil.org/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Q-collective
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 2056

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mark_alec wrote:
Q-collective wrote:
Try it to see it?
Still just the default openoffice icons.

Oh, you want kde icons, I thought you just wanted Qt widgets
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zyzzyva100
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 08 Aug 2005
Posts: 193

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ASIO_BOB wrote:
When run a wizard in Writer, File, Wizards, Fax for an example. Does OO.o Writer claim that "important files are missing" ?


Yea, I noticed this too, guess they really don't have all the bugs worked out. I also get a similar error when I try to save a new file for the first time. It works, but I get 2 error messages first. It looks as though they changed the default paths for a bunch of stuff, and while the settings show the correct paths, and you can edit them all you like, a lot of the menus and some other basic things will not use what you configure, and seem to be hard coded to the old locations.

Guess 2.0.1 will be coming out soon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Plastic
l33t
l33t


Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 649

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zyzzyva100 wrote:
ASIO_BOB wrote:
When run a wizard in Writer, File, Wizards, Fax for an example. Does OO.o Writer claim that "important files are missing" ?


Yea, I noticed this too, guess they really don't have all the bugs worked out. I also get a similar error when I try to save a new file for the first time. It works, but I get 2 error messages first. It looks as though they changed the default paths for a bunch of stuff, and while the settings show the correct paths, and you can edit them all you like, a lot of the menus and some other basic things will not use what you configure, and seem to be hard coded to the old locations.

Guess 2.0.1 will be coming out soon.

Strange, I don't have this problem. Unfortunately I can't test anymore because I'm recompiling it right now because I forgot to set the gnome use flag. so...UGLY! Anyway, is there any reason the use flag is gnome rather than gtk2? Does this enable any other kind of significant integration?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zyzzyva100
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 08 Aug 2005
Posts: 193

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not sure about the use flag, but I wonder if this is a result of having upgraded through all of the release candidates. I didnt have the problem with rc1 or 2, but started having it with rc3 and now the final build. I think the path names may have changed somewhere in there.

Maybe if I unmerge open office, remove all the files from the previous versions and re-emerge it the problem will go away.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sandcrawler
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Mar 2003
Posts: 149
Location: SaintLouis, MO

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

More compile times...

Code:

2.6.13-gentoo-r3 #3 Thu Oct 6 21:27:42 CDT 2005 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
2GB Ram

genlop -t openoffice
 * app-office/openoffice

     Fri Oct 21 03:01:52 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
       merge time: 4 hours, 40 minutes and 27 seconds.


My laptop finished a full hour faster than my desktop. Gotta respect these -M processors...
Plus it's stable on here... Gonna have to troubleshoot ths one I guess...
_________________
--

sandcrawler
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
affan
n00b
n00b


Joined: 25 Mar 2004
Posts: 23
Location: Chicago

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For some reason I was unable to build openoffice-2.0 from source and got some errors when compiling Java Beanshell it seems. It complained of ambiguous references for interface Type. I have attached the complete log for the build (scroll to the very end to see the errors). I am using Gentoo with sun-jdk-1.5.0_01.

Below are some examples of the kinds of errors I got.

Code:
/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0/build/ooo680-m3/beanshell
/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/BeanShell/src/bsh/ClassGeneratorUtil.java:137: referenc
e to Type is ambiguous, both class java.lang.reflect.Type in java.lang.reflect a
nd class bsh.org.objectweb.asm.Type in bsh.org.objectweb.asm match
                this.superClassName = Type.getInternalName( superClass );
                                      ^
/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0/build/ooo680-m3/beanshell
/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/BeanShell/src/bsh/ClassGeneratorUtil.java:137: cannot f
ind symbol
symbol  : method getInternalName(java.lang.Class)
location: interface java.lang.reflect.Type
                this.superClassName = Type.getInternalName( superClass );
                                          ^
/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0/build/ooo680-m3/beanshell
/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/BeanShell/src/bsh/ClassGeneratorUtil.java:185: referenc
e to Type is ambiguous, both class java.lang.reflect.Type in java.lang.reflect a
nd class bsh.org.objectweb.asm.Type in bsh.org.objectweb.asm match
                        interfaceNames[i]=Type.getInternalName( interfaces[i] );
                                          ^

Do you need the complete log? here it is: http://www.cs.odu.edu/~aqureshi/torrent/temp_log.txt.gz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
suka
Developer
Developer


Joined: 22 Apr 2002
Posts: 383

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

affan wrote:
For some reason I was unable to build openoffice-2.0 from source and got some errors when compiling Java Beanshell it seems. It complained of ambiguous references for interface Type. I have attached the complete log for the build (scroll to the very end to see the errors). I am using Gentoo with sun-jdk-1.5.0_01.


openoffice won't build with java-1.5 (which is still hard masked)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lambada
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Posts: 157

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi
I emerged openoffice-bin
I have dotted boxes instead of charachters. :?
What could be wrong?

Thanks
_________________
Lambada
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
affan
n00b
n00b


Joined: 25 Mar 2004
Posts: 23
Location: Chicago

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

suka wrote:
affan wrote:
For some reason I was unable to build openoffice-2.0 from source and got some errors when compiling Java Beanshell it seems. It complained of ambiguous references for interface Type. I have attached the complete log for the build (scroll to the very end to see the errors). I am using Gentoo with sun-jdk-1.5.0_01.


openoffice won't build with java-1.5 (which is still hard masked)


So would it comple if I use the "-java" flag? Also do you know what does "mozilla" flag does? I am only curious if it adds plugin for the browser or something :P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LubosD
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Posts: 206
Location: Czech Republic, EU

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have some grahphic glitches in both openoffice, openoffice-bin and wine too. GTK+ and QT apps are fine.

I have tried nvidia, nv and vesa driver and it is all the same... Any idea what's wrong?

Many items get partially black on hover and Close document ("X") has always inverted colors.

"Button" is black on hover (OO.org Base)
Inverted close button
Toolbar glitch on hover
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 2 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum