Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
netplugd + baselayout-1.12.x + preup function [solved]
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Networking & Security
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
seppelrockt
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:20 am    Post subject: netplugd + baselayout-1.12.x + preup function [solved] Reply with quote

I recently switched to the ~x86 baselayout cause I want to use netplugd for my LAN. I need to run xsupplicant on the LAN interface (it's a wired interface, no WLAN) to do EAP-MD5 authetification (for internet connectivity over my University).

The init script for xsupplicant doesn't work properly (can't stop the xsupplicant) and my networking card needs some spezial care so I ended up with the following preup funktion in /etc/conf.d/net:

Code:
# This block is for authetification with xsupplicant
#***************************************************
# Set eth0 to "PROMISC" mode to work properly with dhcpcd
preup() {
        if [[ ${IFACE} == "eth0" ]]; then
                if [ -f /var/run/xsupplicant ]; then
                        rm /var/run/xsupplicant
                fi
                einfo "Start xsupplicant on ${IFACE}"
                xsupplicant -i eth0 > /dev/null
                einfo "Put ${IFACE} into 'PROMISC' mode"
                interface_set_flag "${IFACE}" promisc true
        fi
}


The idea is that I don't have to wait for the xsupplicant on boot when there is no cable pluged. But this doesn't work cause the preup function is run BEFORE netplugd is started for eth0 and I guess it might not be possible for netplugd to decide whether eth0 in plugged before the preup "initialisation" is run (here: authentification). Now I hope that this is not true in my case and somebody can tell me how I can first start netplugd and then run the preup.

I want to switch to wpa_supplicant for the authentification on wired LAN but this feature is just work in progress and I couldn't set my LAN up when I tried wpa_supplicant last time (0.4.2 or something) - but I will check in the next days whether it works with 0.4.5. Any ideas how to integrate the whole task in conf.d/net without preup but instead using the wpa_supplicant module is highly welcome.


Last edited by seppelrockt on Fri Nov 18, 2005 6:48 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6824
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess you would have to create a xsupplicant net-scripts module - you can use the ones in /lib/rcscripts/net.modules.d as a basis to show you how to write one. I see you're already using some baselayout functions, so you have a good starting point :)

If you write one and get it working, please open a bug on bugs.gentoo.org, attach the module and assign the bug to uberlord@gentoo.org and if it's good enough it will go into baselayout :)
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seppelrockt
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 11:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, i might try this. But first I need some more infos about the net part of baselayout - is there any knowledge source beside studing the other rcscripts? The xsupplicant rcscript has to do all the things I previewsly did with the preup, right? Be prepared to be asked thousands of questions in the next days ... well, I hope only questions that can not be answered by docs.

However I am not sure whether I try to get wpa_supplicant working cause I don't like xsupplicant much and it looks like it will have a not so bright future in Gentoo (no versions bumbs, improvements). In this case is there still a new rcscript needed or will the one that is already there work for wirde interfaces, too? In case it have to be tweaked would you prefere to split the wpa_supplicant rcscript into wired/wireless or can all this be handles in one rcscript?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6824
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 11:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

seppelrockt wrote:
OK, i might try this. But first I need some more infos about the net part of baselayout - is there any knowledge source beside studing the other rcscripts?


Besides studying the source, you can always ask me - preferably on irc.freenode.net #gentoo-base

Quote:
The xsupplicant rcscript has to do all the things I previewsly did with the preup, right?

It just has to start and stop xsupplicant and handle any command line options
Quote:
Be prepared to be asked thousands of questions in the next days ... well, I hope only questions that can not be answered by docs.

Sure, but on irc unless I'm not there.

Quote:

However I am not sure whether I try to get wpa_supplicant working cause I don't like xsupplicant much and it looks like it will have a not so bright future in Gentoo (no versions bumbs, improvements). In this case is there still a new rcscript needed or will the one that is already there work for wirde interfaces, too? In case it have to be tweaked would you prefere to split the wpa_supplicant rcscript into wired/wireless or can all this be handles in one rcscript?


I have no plans to make wpa_supplicant net module work on wired interfaces as it cannot work on wired interfaces itself.
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seppelrockt
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UberLord wrote:
I have no plans to make wpa_supplicant net module work on wired interfaces as it cannot work on wired interfaces itself.


Wrong - wpa_supplicant >= 0.4.0 can be used for all wired interfaces when invokrd with: wpa_supplicant -Dwired
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6824
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

seppelrockt wrote:
Wrong - wpa_supplicant >= 0.4.0 can be used for all wired interfaces when invokrd with: wpa_supplicant -Dwired


Heh - so it can!
I'll see if I can tailor the wpa_supplicant module for it this week.
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6824
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, I've started working on a patch to allow wpa_supplicant to work on wired interfaces.
As ifplugd and netplug also control wired interfaces, it was a little tricker than I thought.

http://dev.gentoo.org/~uberlord/baselayout/wpa_supplicant-wired.patch

It should work, please test and post feedback :)
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seppelrockt
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UberLord wrote:
OK, I've started working on a patch to allow wpa_supplicant to work on wired interfaces.
As ifplugd and netplug also control wired interfaces, it was a little tricker than I thought.

http://dev.gentoo.org/~uberlord/baselayout/wpa_supplicant-wired.patch

It should work, please test and post feedback :)


That's simply amazing - I was very happy when I found a new ebuild for wpa_supplicant-0.4.5 in portage and some seconds later you provide me with a patch for baselayout. I will test both today in the afternoon and report back. Thanks so far for your work!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6824
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Please note that I have no equipment to test wpa_supplicant over wired ethernet, but the daemons look like they're starting and stopping properly :)

I just blogged about writing this patch too

So give me some feedback on it :)
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6824
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Patch updated - it works on wireless cards again!
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seppelrockt
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is there a way to tell wpa_supplicant from inside /etc/conf.d/net which conf to use? I ask cause I use wpa_supplicant for both wired (AEp-MD5 Auth.) and wireless (WPA with preshared key) interface and have to define different conf files (at least I think so).

EDIT: Doesn't look so good atm - I am still fighting to get wpa-supplicant to work with wired LAN (manually, not with baselayout). I first have to manage this before I can check the baselayout stuff :-(

EDIT2: It's a little late now so that might be the reason why I didn't realize that everything works fine with wpa_supplicant - is just doesn't tell me anything even with the -dd debug flag *LOL*. So let's check the baselayout patch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seppelrockt
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 10:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeaaaah, it works - sort of. But it "appears" not to work cause the status messages might need some more tweaking. I get the "starting netplug on eth0" message and then "failed to configure eth0 in the background". This is not correct cause ifconfig shows that everything worked fine (eth0 has an IP) or sometimes it needs a little longer to get one, but it always works. So maybe you could put your hands on the backgrounding messages to make this already great peace of work perfect (I don't have a good idea in what way it should change atm, I have to say).

Here is some dmesg output in case this helps:

Code:
Oct 18 00:30:48 whiterabbit netplugd[10592]: eth0: state ACTIVE flags 0x00001063 UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,MULTICAST -> 0x00001022 BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,MULTICAST
Oct 18 00:30:48 whiterabbit netplugd[13834]: /etc/netplug.d/netplug eth0 probe -> pid 13834
Oct 18 00:30:48 whiterabbit device eth0 left promiscuous mode
Oct 18 00:30:48 whiterabbit netplugd[10592]: eth0: state PROBING pid 13834 exited status 0
Oct 18 00:30:48 whiterabbit netplugd[10592]: caught signal 15 - exiting
Oct 18 00:31:27 whiterabbit b44: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex.
Oct 18 00:31:27 whiterabbit b44: eth0: Flow control is off for TX and off for RX.
Oct 18 00:31:27 whiterabbit netplugd[14301]: eth0: state DOWN flags 0x00001023 UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,MULTICAST -> 0x00001063 UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,MULTICAST
Oct 18 00:31:27 whiterabbit netplugd[14312]: /etc/netplug.d/netplug eth0 in -> pid 14312
Oct 18 00:31:34 whiterabbit rc-scripts: Failed to configure eth0 in the background
Oct 18 00:31:37 whiterabbit NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
Oct 18 00:31:37 whiterabbit b44: eth0: transmit timed out, resetting
Oct 18 00:31:37 whiterabbit b44: eth0: Link is down.
Oct 18 00:31:37 whiterabbit netplugd[14301]: eth0: state INNING flags 0x00001063 UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,MULTICAST -> 0x00001023 UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,MULTICAST
Oct 18 00:31:40 whiterabbit b44: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex.
Oct 18 00:31:40 whiterabbit b44: eth0: Flow control is off for TX and off for RX.
Oct 18 00:31:40 whiterabbit netplugd[14301]: eth0: state WAIT_IN flags 0x00001023 UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,MULTICAST -> 0x00001063 UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,MULTICAST
Oct 18 00:31:40 whiterabbit device eth0 entered promiscuous mode
Oct 18 00:31:48 whiterabbit rc-scripts: Failed to configure eth0 in the background
Oct 18 00:31:48 whiterabbit netplugd[14301]: eth0: state WAIT_IN pid 14312 exited status 0
Oct 18 00:31:48 whiterabbit netplugd[14788]: /etc/netplug.d/netplug eth0 out -> pid 14788
Oct 18 00:31:49 whiterabbit netplugd[14301]: eth0: state OUTING pid 14788 exited status 0
Oct 18 00:31:49 whiterabbit netplugd[15246]: /etc/netplug.d/netplug eth0 in -> pid 15246
Oct 18 00:32:02 whiterabbit netplugd[14301]: eth0: state INNING pid 15246 exited status 0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6824
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, could do you the following please?

Code:
ifconfig eth0 up
wpa_supplicant -c /etc/wpa_supplicant.cont -i eth0 -D wired


And while that chugs away, run this in another terminal
Code:
wpa_cli -i eth0 status


Run that last command say once every 10 seconds for minute or so and then post the results - but be nice and scrub any duplicate outputs!

I'm guessing that wpa_supplicant isn't assoication/connecting to your IEEE server.
I must see if I can set one up myself!
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seppelrockt
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 6:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

UberLord wrote:
I'm guessing that wpa_supplicant isn't assoication/connecting to your IEEE server.
I must see if I can set one up myself!


I'm not sure if I understand you right but let me assure you that from the wpa_supplicant side everithing works right - I am using the inet connection of my university now trough which I am authentificated with wpa_supplicant (used with baselayout integration). From the dmesg I've posted yesterday only the last part is relevant (the other stuff was from testing and might be confusing). This is what I have always in dmesg on boot:

Code:
Oct 18 00:31:48 whiterabbit rc-scripts: Failed to configure eth0 in the background
Oct 18 00:31:48 whiterabbit netplugd[14301]: eth0: state WAIT_IN pid 14312 exited status 0
Oct 18 00:31:48 whiterabbit netplugd[14788]: /etc/netplug.d/netplug eth0 out -> pid 14788
Oct 18 00:31:49 whiterabbit netplugd[14301]: eth0: state OUTING pid 14788 exited status 0
Oct 18 00:31:49 whiterabbit netplugd[15246]: /etc/netplug.d/netplug eth0 in -> pid 15246
Oct 18 00:32:02 whiterabbit netplugd[14301]: eth0: state INNING pid 15246 exited status 0


EDIT: Downloading KDE stuff right now and than have to go to work - I'll post the info you've requested as soon as possible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6824
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You probably need to give the script more time - netplug times out after 10 seconds by default. That's probably not enough time to spawn another net.eth0 and launch wpa_supplicant and then let that launch net.eth0 again.

Code:
plug_timeout_eth0="20"


Try timeouts of 20, 30, 40, 50, then 60 seconds. I'd be interested to know what the timeout threshold is btw :)

Or you could set the timeout to -1 which means it isn't even go to bother waiting. This results in a faster boot time. The downside is that you either need to call "rc" in a postup to start net services as unless you set RC_NET_STRICT_CHECKING to "lo" or "none" in /etc/conf.d/rc
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seppelrockt
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK if played a little with the plug_timeout and when I set it to 40 or more I doesn't timeout. As I already use RC_NET_STRICT_CHECKING="lo" I finaly changed plug_timeout to -1 so netplug might finish it's task when KDE is loading ;-) But I don't know if I like the warning message - a simple "backgrounding" or something might be a better solution. Is it realistic that one accidently puts in -1 and not with the idea to simple not wait?

Thanks again for this great solution - I plugged the cord off and on some times and everytime the connection was established PLUS /etc/init.d/net.eth0 shows the correct status in every situation. So I can finaly wipe out the nasty xsupplicant. And I didn't even need to so much for this improved situation (OK, I was called cheeky git on a public blog, but in this special case I dont care ;-)).

Some questions remain: How to deal with the two wpa_supplicant interfaces eth0 (wired) and eth1 (WLAN)? Can I tell wpa_supplicant to use different conf files by passing the -c argument inside /conf.d/net?

What if both interfaces are active on the same time (I've read wpa_supplicant needs an -N switch in this case - do you have something like this in baselayout)?

I will invastigate in this questions in the afternoon and check carefully whether both interfaces work at the same time. Then I report back of cause and when everything works fine, I hope you can commit the patch to CVS soon.

After the feature hits portage I will write an article in the Wiki of the students appartements to tell the Gentoo people here how to use the new stuff.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6824
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

seppelrockt wrote:
OK if played a little with the plug_timeout and when I set it to 40 or more I doesn't timeout. As I already use RC_NET_STRICT_CHECKING="lo" I finaly changed plug_timeout to -1 so netplug might finish it's task when KDE is loading ;-) But I don't know if I like the warning message - a simple "backgrounding" or something might be a better solution. Is it realistic that one accidently puts in -1 and not with the idea to simple not wait?


I'll review the warning ... no promises though

Quote:
Some questions remain: How to deal with the two wpa_supplicant interfaces eth0 (wired) and eth1 (WLAN)? Can I tell wpa_supplicant to use different conf files by passing the -c argument inside /conf.d/net?


Erm no.
Actually I didn't think of that. Should be a simple fix though

Quote:
What if both interfaces are active on the same time (I've read wpa_supplicant needs an -N switch in this case - do you have something like this in baselayout)?


We deal with this by launching a seperate wpa_supplicant daemon for each interface that requires it[/quote]

Quote:
I hope you can commit the patch to CVS soon.


It's already in our svn repo (although slightly modified) :)
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6824
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://dev.gentoo.org/~uberlord/baselayout/wpa_supplicant-conf.patch
Requires the earlier patch too.
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ripper_svk
n00b
n00b


Joined: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UberLord, could you estimate when will the patch be applied to baselayout in portage? i'm too dumb to use "patch" and a bit scared not to damage my system (i trust your patch, but i don't try myself to apply it correctly)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6824
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Assuming you have baselayout-1.12.0_pre9-r1 installed ...

Make a backup of /lib/rcscripts/net.modules.d, then do this
Code:
cd /tmp
wget http://dev.gentoo.org/~uberlord/baselayout/wpa_supplicant-wired.patch
wget http://dev.gentoo.org/~uberlord/baselayout/wpa_supplicant-conf.patch
patch -p0 < wpa_supplicant-wired.patch
patch -p0 < wpa_supplicant-conf.patch


There you go.
If it fails for whatever reason, you can copy your backup of the net.modules.d folder
If that fails, simply emerge -av1 baselayout
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seppelrockt
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ripper_svk wrote:
UberLord, could you estimate when will the patch be applied to baselayout in portage? i'm too dumb to use "patch" and a bit scared not to damage my system (i trust your patch, but i don't try myself to apply it correctly)


Live is all about learning new things on every corner ...
Are you with me?

1. quickpkg baselayout (packages a "backup" of your current baselayout install - if something goes wrong later)
2. Download patch
3. su - (become root)
3.
Code:
cd /lib/rcscripts/netmodules.d/

4.
Code:
patch -p1 </path/where/you/put/the/patch

5. Check if everything worked from the patch messages. if not read man patch or ask here

# Some explanations:

If you just want to patch on file with another it is simply
Code:
patch original_file patchfile


But if you look at Uberlords patch you will see that it not one but tree or so patches concatenated to one file. Each of the patches in the file applies to another file inside /lib/rcscripts/netmodules.d. If you want to know the details look at the headers of the single patches (starting with the +++ and --- lines). In this case it is easy to let patch do the work recursive to the current directory by
Code:
patch -p1 < patchfile


The -p is for stripping prefixes - please refer to the man cause I can't explain this very good in English (I'm German).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seppelrockt
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UberLord wrote:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~uberlord/baselayout/wpa_supplicant-conf.patch
Requires the earlier patch too.


OK thanks, works with this lines in /etc/conf.d/net

Code:

wpa_supplicant_eth0="-Dwired -c/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf.wired"
wpa_supplicant_eth1="-Dipw -c/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf.wlan"


But I found out that I can not run eth0 and eth1 (aka wlan) at the same time cause both need a running wpa_supplicant and when eth0 is running:

Code:
~ # /etc/init.d/net.eth1 start
 * Starting eth1
 *   Starting wpa_supplicant on eth1 ...
/sbin/wpa_supplicant already running.          [ !! ]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6824
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A patch that allows multiple instances of wpa_supplicant - requires wpa_supplicant-0.4.x as the 0.3.x branch does not work with pidfiles
http://dev.gentoo.org/~uberlord/baselayout/wpa_supplicant-multiple.patch
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seppelrockt
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UberLord wrote:
A patch that allows multiple instances of wpa_supplicant - requires wpa_supplicant-0.4.x as the 0.3.x branch does not work with pidfiles
http://dev.gentoo.org/~uberlord/baselayout/wpa_supplicant-multiple.patch


Thank, will try this when I am at home in the afternoon.

When your three patches make in in SVN then baselayout will depend on wpa_supplicant >= 0.4.5 (older versions have some problems with wired interfaces still), right? This meants on the way to stabilize baselayout-1.12.x it's also important to stabilize the wpa_supplicant-0.4.5 (or greater).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6824
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

seppelrockt wrote:
When your three patches make in in SVN then baselayout will depend on wpa_supplicant >= 0.4.5 (older versions have some problems with wired interfaces still), right? This meants on the way to stabilize baselayout-1.12.x it's also important to stabilize the wpa_supplicant-0.4.5 (or greater).


0.3.x will still work - you just can't run it on more than one interface. So technically, we don't need to stable 0.4.x with baselayout-1.12
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Networking & Security All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum