| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Redeeman
l33t
Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 958
Location: Portugal
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 12:25 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| i use azureus and nano works fine with string and libm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gnufsh
Guru
Joined: 28 Dec 2002
Posts: 400
Location: Portland, OR
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I have azurus not starting with the strings patch, everything works just fine with just the libm patches. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gralves
Guru
Joined: 20 May 2003
Posts: 389
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Redeeman wrote: | | i use azureus and nano works fine with string and libm |
Me too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Redeeman
l33t
Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 958
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| another thing which gets a nice speedup is the gimp |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gnufsh
Guru
Joined: 28 Dec 2002
Posts: 400
Location: Portland, OR
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 5:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
For me, Azureus only crashes when I start it up and there are torrents already open. That is, if I exit it while downloading one, it crashes when starting up. From the console, it gives this error:
| Code: | Attempting to start Azureus...
**** DHT: Anti-spoof currently disabled for old clients ****
(<unknown>:22477): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Deprecated function. User modifications to the MIME database are no longer supported.
/usr/bin/azureus: line 47: 22477 Segmentation fault java -cp $(java-config -p systray4j,azureus-bin 2>/dev/null) -Djava.library.path="${AZDIR}" org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main "$1"
|
With just the libm patches it is fine. Any ideas? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Redeeman
l33t
Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 958
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| what java version are you using? i use 1.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gnufsh
Guru
Joined: 28 Dec 2002
Posts: 400
Location: Portland, OR
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dan@localhost ~ $ emerge -pv blackdown-jdk
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild R ] dev-java/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.02 +browserplugin +doc +mozilla 0 kB
Total size of downloads: 0 kB
How can I get 1.5? The sun java stuff is masked. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Redeeman
l33t
Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 958
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| you really should get java 1.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nxsty
Veteran
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gnufsh wrote: | dan@localhost ~ $ emerge -pv blackdown-jdk
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild R ] dev-java/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.02 +browserplugin +doc +mozilla 0 kB
Total size of downloads: 0 kB
How can I get 1.5? The sun java stuff is masked. |
Add it along with the latest azureus and its depend swt to your /etc/portage/package.keywords:
| Code: | dev-java/sun-jre-bin ~amd64
net-p2p/azureus-bin ~amd64
dev-java/swt ~amd64 |
Then emerge sun-jre-bin (you'll have to download the distfiles manually), switch to it with java-config and emerge azureus-bin.
It would be great to know if the latest java and azureus solves these issues! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gnufsh
Guru
Joined: 28 Dec 2002
Posts: 400
Location: Portland, OR
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm already on ~amd64. I emerge sun-jre-bin, and when attempting to set the system jvm, I get:
localhost ~ # java-config --set-system-vm=sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.04
javac not found at /opt/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.04/bin/javac or /opt/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.04/jre/bin/javac
javadoc not found at /opt/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.04/bin/javadoc or /opt/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.04/jre/bin/javadoc
jar not found at /opt/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.04/bin/jar or /opt/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.04/jre/bin/jar
rmic not found at /opt/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.04/bin/rmic or /opt/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.04/jre/bin/rmic
THIS SYSTEM VM IS NOT SUFFICIENT, REQUIRED BINARIES WERE NOT FOUND
System Virtual Machine set
You may want to update your enviroment by running:
"/usr/sbin/env-update && source /etc/profile" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Redeeman
l33t
Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 958
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i get that too.. ignore it |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gnufsh
Guru
Joined: 28 Dec 2002
Posts: 400
Location: Portland, OR
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| That seems to have done the trick. Does anyone know when the 1.5 version of blackdown will be out? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Redeeman
l33t
Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 958
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| why do you want to use blackdown? afaik its the same code anyway |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
satanskin
Guru
Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 353
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, I updated to java 1.5.0.04, remerged azureus, d/l & untar overlay, digested, and am ready to emerge glibc. However I want a before test with memcpy but can't seem to find it ANYWHERE! Where is it? What package does it come with, etc? Thanks!
Edit: I just found the memcpy.c file on the bugzilla, but don't know what to do with it now. some help please? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
satanskin
Guru
Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 353
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 2:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, I got memcpy working. And the patched glibc compiled. the results:
Before:
| Code: | thor ~ # ./memcpy 2200 1000 1048576
Memory to memory copy rate = 1770.920166 MBytes / sec. Block size = 1048576.
thor ~ # time gimp
real 0m19.983s
user 0m1.766s
sys 0m0.244s
|
After:
| Code: | thor ~ # ./memcpy 2200 1000 1048576
Memory to memory copy rate = 2258.734375 MBytes / sec. Block size = 1048576.
thor ~ # time gimp
real 0m4.599s
user 0m2.161s
sys 0m0.204s
|
The time gimp was for it to load and me close it right after the tip of the day came up.
Nice improvements so far! Azureus IS working for me so far as well. I'll have to wait and see what else is faster. Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gnufsh
Guru
Joined: 28 Dec 2002
Posts: 400
Location: Portland, OR
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Redeeman wrote: | | why do you want to use blackdown? afaik its the same code anyway |
I want a JDK, not just a JRE, and the sun jdk is currently masked on amd64. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wuzzerd
Guru
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 466
Location: New Mexico
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Methinks it works good.
| Code: |
memcopy 2000 1000 1048576
Before:
Memory to memory copy rate = 1369.979370 MBytes / sec. Block size = 1048576.
After:
Memory to memory copy rate = 2156.373535 MBytes / sec. Block size = 1048576.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
no4b
Bodhisattva
Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 774
Location: Tarnów, Poland
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Waiting for glibc-2.3.5-r2 overlay. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nxsty
Veteran
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| no4b wrote: | | Waiting for glibc-2.3.5-r2 overlay. |
Done! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DNAspark99
Guru
Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Posts: 321
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nxsty wrote: | | no4b wrote: | | Waiting for glibc-2.3.5-r2 overlay. |
Done! |
fyi, running strong and stable here, no problems ...so far |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stonie
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Jun 2003
Posts: 87
Location: S'Minga, Halleluja
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wuzzerd
Guru
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 466
Location: New Mexico
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DNAspark99 wrote: |
fyi, running strong and stable here, no problems ...so far |
Good to hear, I'm on my second compile, forgot to put in the new overlay, DOH. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
satanskin
Guru
Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 353
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nxsty wrote: | | no4b wrote: | | Waiting for glibc-2.3.5-r2 overlay. |
Done! |
What's different in the -r2 overlay? And has the link in the original post updated with it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Redeeman
l33t
Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 958
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| satanskin wrote: | | nxsty wrote: | | no4b wrote: | | Waiting for glibc-2.3.5-r2 overlay. |
Done! |
What's different in the -r2 overlay? And has the link in the original post updated with it? |
the tarball with the overlay has the same name, so the link never needs updating |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
satanskin
Guru
Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 353
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| and what is different in the new one? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
