| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sge_kane
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Oct 2004
Posts: 84
Location: Germany (Frankfurt)
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 12:53 am Post subject: strange nautilus font scaling in gnome 2.10 [+ WORKAROUND] |
 |
|
Hi guys,
since I already read two posts concerning my problem without any answers in the awfully huge and therefore chaotic Gnome 2.10 main threads, I decided to open a new thread for this and hopefully I did not oversee another that bears with this topic...
So here we go... In Nautilus 2.10.0 and 2.10.1 the font seems very small when reducing the Icon size to 75 or even 50 %.... I know for sure, this was not in Gnome 2.8.3 and any version before... This is exactly what is described by two others in the above mentioned thread...
The font size is mainly regulated by the "application font" size... not sure if this was the same in elder Gnomes but at least the font should stay this size... I'm running Sans (bitstream vera i think) in 8 point size....
It is unbearable for me to have a larger application size as well as having large icons in Nautilus just in order to be able to read the font... In past only the icons' sizes were affected by the Nautilus setting, not the font...
The only solution for me right now is having the List View but there features like audio previewing are missing...
Well, if there should be no one with a solution, it would be nice to know if others are affected by this as well in order to have a reason for writing a bug report...
Many thanx in advance...
sge_kane
Last edited by sge_kane on Sat May 14, 2005 6:36 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lokheed
Veteran
Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 1295
Location: /usr/src/linux
|
| Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Same behaviour here. I havent checked gnome to see if there is a bug filed but it seems font size is tied into icon size which shouldnt be the case. Its not a solvable bug at this point.
Sadly there is nothing you can do and this has not been addressed in the latest cvs version either...I certainly hope the Gnome guys dont want to consider this a "feature."
_________________
You're not afraid of the dark are you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sge_kane
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Oct 2004
Posts: 84
Location: Germany (Frankfurt)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Schmolch
l33t
Joined: 16 Jun 2002
Posts: 746
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is very annoying indeed.
Sometimes its hard to understand why things in Gnome are like the way they are.
Why did they screw this up so hard and why dont they care about resetting it to its previous working state??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hoschi
Advocate
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 2517
Location: Ulm, Germany, Europe
|
| Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanks for the thread and pm, any idea how to install the patch?
_________________
Just you and me strogg! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sge_kane
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Oct 2004
Posts: 84
Location: Germany (Frankfurt)
|
| Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well,
I modified the patch proposed by Olivier Fock-Ping, so that all PANGO_SCALES are invalid. As a result I can now use nautilus as I di before in Gnome 2.8.3...
No font-scaling whatever zoom level I choose....
Here is the working how-to:
First take this ebuild and place it in /usr/local/portage/gnome-base/nautilus/nautilus-2.10.0-r1.ebuild (or whatever your portage overlay might be):
| Code: |
# Copyright 1999-2005 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/gnome-base/nautilus/nautilus-2.10.0.ebuild,v 1.9 2005/05/06 10:30:51 corsair Exp $
inherit gnome2 eutils
DESCRIPTION="A filemanager for the Gnome2 desktop"
HOMEPAGE="http://www.gnome.org/projects/nautilus/"
LICENSE="GPL-2 LGPL-2 FDL-1.1"
SLOT="0"
KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~ia64 ~ppc ~sparc ~x86 ~ppc64"
IUSE="oggvorbis gstreamer mad flac"
#IUSE="oggvorbis gstreamer cups mad flac"
RDEPEND=">=dev-libs/glib-2.6
>=x11-libs/pango-1.2
>=x11-libs/gtk+-2.3
>=dev-libs/libxml2-2.4.7
=gnome-base/eel-${PV}*
>=gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.9.1
>=media-sound/esound-0.2.27
>=gnome-base/gconf-2
>=gnome-base/libgnome-2.6
>=gnome-base/libgnomeui-2.6
>=gnome-base/gnome-desktop-2.9.91
>=media-libs/libart_lgpl-2.3.10
>=gnome-base/libbonobo-2.2
>=gnome-base/librsvg-2.0.1
>=gnome-base/orbit-2.4
>=x11-libs/startup-notification-0.8
>=media-libs/libexif-0.5.12
dev-libs/popt
virtual/fam
sys-apps/eject
!gstreamer? ( oggvorbis? ( media-sound/vorbis-tools ) )
gstreamer? (
>=media-libs/gstreamer-0.8
>=media-libs/gst-plugins-0.8
mad? ( >=media-plugins/gst-plugins-mad-0.8 )
oggvorbis? (
>=media-plugins/gst-plugins-ogg-0.8
>=media-plugins/gst-plugins-vorbis-0.8
)
flac? ( >=media-plugins/gst-plugins-flac-0.8 )
)"
# FIXME : what to do with exif/jpeg config stuff ?
DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
sys-devel/gettext
>=dev-util/intltool-0.29
>=app-text/scrollkeeper-0.3.11
>=dev-util/pkgconfig-0.12.0"
PDEPEND=">=x11-themes/gnome-icon-theme-1.1.91
x11-themes/gnome-themes"
DOCS="AUTHORS ChangeLo* HACKING MAINTAINERS NEWS README THANKS TODO"
G2CONF="${G2CONF} $(use_enable gstreamer)"
src_unpack() {
unpack ${A}
cd ${S}
# use gstreamer for audio preview (patch by <foser@gentoo.org>)
use gstreamer && epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PN}-2.9.90-icon_view_gst.patch
epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PN}-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch
# -- Component architecture has changed in 2.9 -- this
# -- patch no longer applies.
# add libgnomeprint support
# With extra 2.8 fun - fixes #65604
# if use cups; then
# if has_version ">=net-print/gnome-cups-manager-0.28"; then
# epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PN}-2.8-x-printers.patch
# else
# epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PN}-2-x-printers.patch
# fi
# fi
#applied in 2.9.91
# patch to support libexif versions 0.5 and 0.6
#epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PN}-2.9.90-libexif.patch
# stop nautilus linking to cdda/paranoia
sed -i -e "/^CORE_LIBS/s/\$CDDA_LIBS//" configure.in
# and we always need to regenerate now, because we
# always apply the libexif patch <obz@gentoo.org>
if use gstreamer; then
WANT_AUTOCONF=2.5 autoheader || die
WANT_AUTOCONF=2.5 autoconf || die
WANT_AUTOMAKE=1.7 automake || die
fi
}
USE_DESTDIR="1"
|
Notice: the one an ony modified line here is that one:
| Code: |
epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PN}-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch
|
...which leads us to the patch, that you should place into the "files" subfolder in the nautilus portage-overlay foder.
Name it "nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch" as named in the ebuild...
| Code: |
--- nautilus-2.10.0.orig/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c 2005-02-22 09:33:11.000000000 +0100
+++ nautilus-2.10.0/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c 2005-05-14 18:49:50.994000608 +0200
@@ -4353,13 +4353,13 @@
details->zoom_level = NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_STANDARD;
- details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_SMALLEST] = -3 * PANGO_SCALE;
- details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_SMALLER] = -3 * PANGO_SCALE;
- details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_SMALL] = -2 * PANGO_SCALE;
+ details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_SMALLEST] = 0 * PANGO_SCALE;
+ details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_SMALLER] = 0 * PANGO_SCALE;
+ details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_SMALL] = 0 * PANGO_SCALE;
details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_STANDARD] = 0 * PANGO_SCALE;
- details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_LARGE] = 2 * PANGO_SCALE;
- details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_LARGER] = 4 * PANGO_SCALE;
- details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_LARGEST] = 4 * PANGO_SCALE;
+ details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_LARGE] = 0 * PANGO_SCALE;
+ details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_LARGER] = 0 * PANGO_SCALE;
+ details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_LARGEST] = 0 * PANGO_SCALE;
container->details = details;
|
By watching this code, I think we can see, that the developer obviously intended to scale the fonts... Disgusting...
Well, we will see how they will handle it in later revisions....
Furthermore, make sure all other patches required by nautilus are placed in the files folder as well....
| Code: |
use gstreamer && epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PN}-2.9.90-icon_view_gst.patch
|
shows us, that you need the "nautilus-2.9.90-icon_view_gst.patch" (if using gstreamer) that you find in the regular $PORTAGE/gnome-base/nautilus/files folder...
Well now put the following lines into your terminal and your finished:
| Code: |
cd /usr/local/portage/gnome-base/nautilus/
ebuild nautilus-2.10.0-r1.ebuild digest
emerge --oneshot nautilus
|
Works flawlessly....
Last edited by sge_kane on Sun May 15, 2005 10:07 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lokheed
Veteran
Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 1295
Location: /usr/src/linux
|
| Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
sge_kane, your patch cannot be applied. I am able to apply Olivier Fock-Ping's patch but yours faults.
Nautilus 2.10.1 here.
These two lines cause the problems:
| Code: | details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_SMALLEST] = -3 * PANGO_SCALE;
details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_SMALLER] = -3 * PANGO_SCALE; |
Here is the output:
| Code: | ***** nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch *****
====================================================
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p0 -g0 --no-backup-if-mismatch < /portage/gnome-base/nautilus/files/nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch
====================================================
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ur nautilus-2.10.0.orig/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c nautilus-2.10.0/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c
|--- nautilus-2.10.0.orig/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c 2005-02-22 09:33:11.000000000 +0100
|+++ nautilus-2.10.0/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c 2005-04-09 23:32:26.000000000 +0200
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
patch: **** malformed patch at line 17:
==================================================== |
_________________
You're not afraid of the dark are you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sge_kane
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Oct 2004
Posts: 84
Location: Germany (Frankfurt)
|
| Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well,
first of all I missed the last line of the patchfile when pasting it into the board....
I added it to my post above.... It would have worked anyway....
The reason for the patch not patching, lies in the fashion the forum handles TABULARS....
So, since I at the moment have no webspace, where I could put the correctly encoded file, you have to replace
the SPACES in the three lines that begin previously to the others by TABS when putting in your patchfile.
| Code: |
- details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_SMALLEST] = -3 * PANGO_SCALE;
+ details->font_size_table[NAUTILUS_ZOOM_LEVEL_SMALLEST] = 0 * PANGO_SCALE;
container->details = details;
|
Nasty, the developer used TABS at all in his code....
Well, furthermore I checked the patch against nautilus-2.10.1 as well. Just take the ebuild and rename it to nautilus-2.10.1-r1.ebuild and the patch respectively.
@lokheed
consider when using "-p0" in your patch command to rename 2.10.0 by 2.10.1 in all occurences in the patchfile, when patching nautilus-2.10.1...
anyway, when using portage it does not matter....
Cheers
sge_kane |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hoschi
Advocate
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 2517
Location: Ulm, Germany, Europe
|
| Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
emerge...*hope*
| Quote: | * Applying nautilus-2.9.90-icon_view_gst.patch ... [ ok ]
* Applying nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch ...
* Failed Patch: nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch !
* ( /usr/portage/gnome-base/nautilus/files/nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch )
*
* Include in your bugreport the contents of:
*
* /var/tmp/portage/nautilus-2.10.0/temp/nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch-28542.out
!!! ERROR: gnome-base/nautilus-2.10.0 failed.
!!! Function epatch, Line 358, Exitcode 0
!!! Failed Patch: nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch!
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.
|
| Quote: | * Applying nautilus-2.9.90-icon_view_gst.patch ... [ ok ]
* Applying nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch ...
* Failed Patch: nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch !
* ( /usr/portage/gnome-base/nautilus/files/nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch )
*
* Include in your bugreport the contents of:
*
* /var/tmp/portage/nautilus-2.10.0/temp/nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch-7644.out
!!! ERROR: gnome-base/nautilus-2.10.0 failed.
!!! Function epatch, Line 358, Exitcode 0
!!! Failed Patch: nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch!
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.
party nautilus # cat /var/tmp/portage/nautilus-2.10.0/temp/nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch-7644.out
***** nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch *****
====================================================
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p0 -g0 --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/gnome-base/nautilus/files/nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch
====================================================
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- nautilus-2.10.0.orig/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c 2005-02-22 09:33:11.000000000 +0100
|+++ nautilus-2.10.0/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c 2005-05-14 18:49:50.994000608 +0200
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
====================================================
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p1 -g0 --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/gnome-base/nautilus/files/nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch
====================================================
patching file libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 4353.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c.rej
====================================================
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p2 -g0 --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/gnome-base/nautilus/files/nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch
====================================================
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- nautilus-2.10.0.orig/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c 2005-02-22 09:33:11.000000000 +0100
|+++ nautilus-2.10.0/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c 2005-05-14 18:49:50.994000608 +0200
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
====================================================
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p3 -g0 --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/gnome-base/nautilus/files/nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch
====================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- nautilus-2.10.0.orig/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c 2005-02-22 09:33:11.000000000 +0100
|+++ nautilus-2.10.0/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c 2005-05-14 18:49:50.994000608 +0200
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
====================================================
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p4 -g0 --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/gnome-base/nautilus/files/nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch
====================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- nautilus-2.10.0.orig/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c 2005-02-22 09:33:11.000000000 +0100
|+++ nautilus-2.10.0/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-container.c 2005-05-14 18:49:50.994000608 +0200
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
|
_________________
Just you and me strogg!
Last edited by hoschi on Sun May 15, 2005 6:23 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lokheed
Veteran
Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 1295
Location: /usr/src/linux
|
| Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sge_kane wrote: |
@lokheed
consider when using "-p0" in your patch command to rename 2.10.0 by 2.10.1 in all occurences in the patchfile, when patching nautilus-2.10.1...
anyway, when using portage it does not matter....
|
yeah, already tried that one already, still no good 
_________________
You're not afraid of the dark are you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sge_kane
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Oct 2004
Posts: 84
Location: Germany (Frankfurt)
|
| Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@hoschi
Did you replace the SPACES by TABS at those 3 mentioned positions?
If so, I have no clue, why the patch does not work... It tried multiple times here, had your problem when just pasting the patch in a file (because of the SPACES), but besides this issue, it patches just fine...
@lokheed
What exactly did you try? Do you also have an emerge output?
@all
I checked once more:
Just in case you don't believe me  , here the first lines of emerge output:
| Code: |
moria files # emerge --oneshot nautilus
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) gnome-base/nautilus-2.10.0-r1 to /
>>> md5 files ;-) nautilus-2.10.0-r1.ebuild
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2-nocdda.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/digest-nautilus-2.10.0-r1
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-1.0.6-hyperbola.diff
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-1.0.6-mozilla-embed-1.0_rc3.diff
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-1.0.6-mozilla-1.0_rc1.diff
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-1.0.6-mozilla-1.0_rc3.diff
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2-libexif.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2-x-printers.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2.6-icon_view_gst_audio_preview.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2.8-x-printers.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2.9.90-icon_view_gst.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/macros/gnome.m4
>>> md5 files ;-) files/macros/nautilus-macros.m4
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) nautilus-2.10.0.tar.bz2
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking nautilus-2.10.0.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/nautilus-2.10.0-r1/work
* Applying nautilus-2.9.90-icon_view_gst.patch ... [ ok ]
* Applying nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch ... [ ok ]
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: Using auxiliary files such as `acconfig.h', `config.h.bot'
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: and `config.h.top', to define templates for `config.h.in'
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: is deprecated and discouraged.
autoheader-2.59:
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: Using the third argument of `AC_DEFINE' and
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: `AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED' allows to define a template without
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: `acconfig.h':
autoheader-2.59:
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: AC_DEFINE([NEED_FUNC_MAIN], 1,
autoheader-2.59: [Define if a function `main' is needed.])
autoheader-2.59:
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: More sophisticated templates can also be produced, see the
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: documentation.
|
and for nautilus-2.10.1-r1 after unmasking stuff and
| Code: |
moria files # echo "=gnome-base/nautilus-2.10.1-r1" >> /etc/portage/package.unmask && emerge --oneshot -O nautilus
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) gnome-base/nautilus-2.10.1-r1 to /
>>> md5 files ;-) nautilus-2.10.0-r1.ebuild
>>> md5 files ;-) nautilus-2.10.1-r1.ebuild
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2-nocdda.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/digest-nautilus-2.10.0-r1
>>> md5 files ;-) files/digest-nautilus-2.10.1-r1
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-1.0.6-hyperbola.diff
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-1.0.6-mozilla-embed-1.0_rc3.diff
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-1.0.6-mozilla-1.0_rc1.diff
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-1.0.6-mozilla-1.0_rc3.diff
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2-libexif.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2-x-printers.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2.10.1-icon-view-textsize.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2.6-icon_view_gst_audio_preview.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2.8-x-printers.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/nautilus-2.9.90-icon_view_gst.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/macros/gnome.m4
>>> md5 files ;-) files/macros/nautilus-macros.m4
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) nautilus-2.10.1.tar.bz2
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking nautilus-2.10.1.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/nautilus-2.10.1-r1/work
* Applying nautilus-2.9.90-icon_view_gst.patch ... [ ok ]
* Applying nautilus-2.10.1-icon-view-textsize.patch ... [ ok ]
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: Using auxiliary files such as `acconfig.h', `config.h.bot'
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: and `config.h.top', to define templates for `config.h.in'
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: is deprecated and discouraged.
autoheader-2.59:
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: Using the third argument of `AC_DEFINE' and
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: `AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED' allows to define a template without
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: `acconfig.h':
autoheader-2.59:
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: AC_DEFINE([NEED_FUNC_MAIN], 1,
autoheader-2.59: [Define if a function `main' is needed.])
autoheader-2.59:
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: More sophisticated templates can also be produced, see the
autoheader-2.59: WARNING: documentation.
Caught signal 2 in pid 13294
autom4te-2.59: /usr/bin/m4 terminated by signal: 2
autoheader-2.59: /usr/bin/autom4te-2.59 failed with exit status: 1
|
...runs as well....
I have put both ebuild for 2.10.0 and the patch on a webserver:
http://kanne.ne-is.de/nautilus-patch/nautilus-2.10.0-r1.ebuild
http://kanne.ne-is.de/nautilus-patch/nautilus-2.10.0-icon-view-textsize.patch
I just can say it runs smoothly over here and I don't get the point why it shouldn't on your side as well....
Hopefully, you can all use the normal fontsize soon 
Cheers,
sge_kane |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Schmolch
l33t
Joined: 16 Jun 2002
Posts: 746
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
The patch works very well here.
Thank you very much |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hoschi
Advocate
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 2517
Location: Ulm, Germany, Europe
|
| Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trying again...and it works 
great, thank you!
_________________
Just you and me strogg! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lokheed
Veteran
Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 1295
Location: /usr/src/linux
|
| Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, applied the new patch without fail. Thank you.
_________________
You're not afraid of the dark are you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bols
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 15 May 2004
Posts: 112
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Works fine here too... maybe post it on bugs.gentoo.org would be a good idea?!
Thanks for the ebuild/patch sge_kane |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lokheed
Veteran
Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 1295
Location: /usr/src/linux
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bols wrote: | | Works fine here too... maybe post it on bugs.gentoo.org would be a good idea?! |
Go ahead, why cant you create an account and recommend the patch?
_________________
You're not afraid of the dark are you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bols
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 15 May 2004
Posts: 112
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have an accound on bugs.gentoo.org, that's not the problem. I could post it but with this kind of "bug", gentoo developers prefer leave them like that and wait for the bug to be fixed upstream by the gnome developers. Workarounds for a distro aren't the way to go...
I mean this bug isn't gentoo related, this weird behavior happens on every distro. So I think the best thing to do is just waiting and helping the gnome developers to fix it, what do you think? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lokheed
Veteran
Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Posts: 1295
Location: /usr/src/linux
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bols wrote: | I have an accound on bugs.gentoo.org, that's not the problem. I could post it but with this kind of "bug", gentoo developers prefer leave them like that and wait for the bug to be fixed upstream by the gnome developers. Workarounds for a distro aren't the way to go...
I mean this bug isn't gentoo related, this weird behavior happens on every distro. So I think the best thing to do is just waiting and helping the gnome developers to fix it, what do you think? |
It still has not been checked into CVS HEAD and its been there for 6 months now. I think you should post the patch and then at least more people might download the updated nautilus ebuild and solve this problem. Gentoo specific or not, a new nautilus ebuild should be put up on bugzilla. If it sits there till it gets fixed upstream, so be it, but at least that way, people can slap it in their overlay and move on.
_________________
You're not afraid of the dark are you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hoschi
Advocate
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 2517
Location: Ulm, Germany, Europe
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think Gnome 2.10 is the buggiest release since years. And that, with really no new features, since 2.8.
Stupid 6 month release...
_________________
Just you and me strogg! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bols
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 15 May 2004
Posts: 112
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sge_kane
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Oct 2004
Posts: 84
Location: Germany (Frankfurt)
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well,
a little late now ....
But anyway, maybe some users like to use this ebuild...
Finally the issue has gone to Gnome CVS head, but they are not going to fix it the way, we were probably demanding.
See yourself @ http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160080 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Desktop Environments
