View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
radio_flyer Guru
Joined: 04 Nov 2004 Posts: 317 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 7:48 pm Post subject: libg2c and gcc 4.1 - any resolution? [SOLVED] |
|
|
I'm running stable x86 on both my laptop and desktop systems. I used my laptop as the sacrificial victim for upgrading to the new 2006.1 profile and the gcc 4.1 compiler. Suprisingly enough for Gentoo only a handful of stable packages wouldn't compile in the transition (My list is: blas-atlas, mtink, libdv, celestia, xfractint, kpdf, xfoil, ksynaptics, xaos, xpaint, planets and rss-glx.)
Before I get to my question here's the resolution on some of the programs above for those searching for possible answers (as usual folks running the more-common ~x86 systems won't have most of these issues):
mtink - move to the ~x86 version for now
xpaint - move to ~x86 version for now
kpdf - add 'app-text/poppler-bindings qt3' to /etc/portage/package.use and re-emerge poppler-bindings then kpdf
planets - add 'dev-lang/ocaml tcltk' to /etc/portage/package.use and re-emerge dev-lang/ocaml then planets
libdv - move to ~x86 (watch out for this https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121871 bug).
xaos - move to ~x86
xfractint - using ~x86 will allow program to compile, but it segfaults when running - still investigating
Anyway, the big issue is with xfoil -- it needs libg2c but can't find it. It seems that according to this bug:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136988
that library went away. Has anyone found a workaround for this yet?
Last edited by radio_flyer on Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:12 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
helio Apprentice
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 237
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
radio_flyer Guru
Joined: 04 Nov 2004 Posts: 317 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yup, that works, if you haven't already removed the old GCC like I did
I found and fixed my issue with xfoil, see:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147033
Apparently the new GNU fortran compiler, which targets the F90 spec level, is not entirely backwards-compatible with F77 yet.
Even though it's not truly 'solved', I'm going to mark this thread solved because the issue is esoteric and unlikely to be resolved any time soon. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|