View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
zinion Guru


Joined: 27 Oct 2004 Posts: 541 Location: Ruhgebietshausen
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:00 pm Post subject: captive @ amd64? |
|
|
Simple question:
Is it possible to get NTFS-captive running at 64bit-gentoo? _________________ Es ist schön und warm
hier im Gentoo-Land |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zinion Guru


Joined: 27 Oct 2004 Posts: 541 Location: Ruhgebietshausen
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
*bump*
Nothing? Not even "forget it, it doesn't work"? _________________ Es ist schön und warm
hier im Gentoo-Land |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pajarico Guru


Joined: 01 May 2004 Posts: 493 Location: Madrid, España.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2004 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I( think it much depends on captive nature. If it is a user-space application, maybe you will be able to run it as 32 bits, but if it is a kernel module i think you won't be able to since you can't have a 64 bit environment using 32 bit modules.
 _________________ Gentoo: the only software worth paying that is free. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zinion Guru


Joined: 27 Oct 2004 Posts: 541 Location: Ruhgebietshausen
|
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmkay...anybody here can tell something more about this? _________________ Es ist schön und warm
hier im Gentoo-Land |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
racoontje Veteran

Joined: 19 Jul 2004 Posts: 1290
|
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can use userspace 32-bit programs (ie not compiled with AMD64 gcc flags) in your fully 64-bit environment because of certain libraries. Kernel-level modules need to be built for your local arch, this is also true for ppc, mips, alpha... and also for x86-64.
Perhaps this will help you understand:
The tg3 module is open source, so a ppc (Mac) with this ethernet card can use the kernel module just as well as an x86 box could.
The ATi fglrx driver kernel module isn't, so we can't use it in 64 bit environments. Someone with ppc is slightly more screwed than we are, because there's a minor chance ATi might bother to recompile for AMD64. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zinion Guru


Joined: 27 Oct 2004 Posts: 541 Location: Ruhgebietshausen
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah I know all this....but what about captive? IS it a userspace application or a kernel module? _________________ Es ist schön und warm
hier im Gentoo-Land |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pajarico Guru


Joined: 01 May 2004 Posts: 493 Location: Madrid, España.
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
zinion wrote: | Yeah I know all this....but what about captive? IS it a userspace application or a kernel module? |
As far as i have read in captive webpage, it consists in two things:
-A open-sourced LUFS Kernel Driver Module
-The ntfs.sys driver (a win32 binary)
Once installed you can mount ntfs partitions using the mount command.
The open-sourced part may work, as long it compiles well; the ntfs.sys part may not.
I'm almost positive that in this case it won't work, even if you are lucky enough to compile the kernel module i think it is impossible to make it use a 32 bit binary.
But the best way is always RTFM and try it yourself
EDIT: there a wrapper for using Windows drivers for some wireless cards called ndiswrapper, that suffers from the same problem. _________________ Gentoo: the only software worth paying that is free. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zinion Guru


Joined: 27 Oct 2004 Posts: 541 Location: Ruhgebietshausen
|
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmkay...Windows should finish Windows XP 64bit so we can use their drivers  _________________ Es ist schön und warm
hier im Gentoo-Land |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ninelives n00b

Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, Windows PX 64 has been out for a while now. Has anyone been working on this? I'd love to help but don't program much more than php. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crazycat l33t


Joined: 26 Aug 2003 Posts: 838 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2005 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
As far as I know noone develops cative now. I think it is possible to make it work (Anyway all dependecies do work) but I think I'm not qualified enough to do so. I'll look into it if I have some time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
linj n00b

Joined: 14 Jun 2005 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2005 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doesn't work for me (emerging it, even)... comes out with a whole list of errors. Tell me if you can get it to work.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crazycat l33t


Joined: 26 Aug 2003 Posts: 838 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2005 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nope , i fear it's beyond my abilties I checked the source and I think it's really sophisticated piece of software. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gentree Watchman


Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Posts: 5350 Location: France, Old Europe
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You may find some more help at SuSE.
They have an rpm for arch64 and I dont think they would have it on thier ftp servers if it did not work.
I'm looking into this and I may try SuSE first since setting anything up on Gentoo takes an order of magnitude longer.
Look at the last post on this page for some info
http://forums.suselinuxsupport.de/lofiversion/index.php/t15389.html
BTW. It LUFS that is no longer developed not captive. _________________ Linux, because I'd rather own a free OS than steal one that's not worth paying for.
Gentoo because I'm a masochist
AthlonXP-M on A7N8X. Portage ~x86 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Master_Of_Disaster l33t


Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 610 Location: 15.05072° East, 48.13747° North (aka Mauer), Austria
|
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@Gentree:
Captive Website wrote: | Development Status
Project is no longer developed. The key functionality is reached by the latest released version. All its resources are available here for download. |
_________________ post tenebras lux, post fenestras tux
Registered Linux User Nr. 312509
Adopt an unanswered post today! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cedrm n00b

Joined: 24 Dec 2005 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2005 3:04 pm Post subject: Captive using 64 bit kernel |
|
|
Hey guys,
I was building a full blown live cd (32 bit), with captive. I decided to add a 64 bit kernel to that cd for full compatibility purposes with my system. The entire root is compiled as a generic pentium and up. Without doing anything special to the cd except adding a 64 bit compiled kernel to it, I booted up the kernel (which includes fuse), captive worked like a charm (slow but as slow as usual).
So yes, i guess that captive can work using a 64 bit kernel on a 32 bit system. But using a 64 bit system, it will not work.
When I get time to look at it a bit deeper, I will try to find what causes the problems on a fully 64 bit system.
If you have any suggestions, please let me know! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thedopefishlives Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 23 Nov 2005 Posts: 84
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Would it be possible to run captive in a 32-bit chroot on a 64-bit kernel? I've only recently discovered this project, and I'd really like to try it out, as it would greatly simplify all my OS juggling that I have to do from time to time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
H3g3m0n Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 14 Dec 2002 Posts: 97
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
I recall reading a post a while back syaing captive ntfs worked in a 32bit chroot but not on a native 64bit system. It was awhile back so i might be getting confuzzled with somthing else. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gentree Watchman


Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Posts: 5350 Location: France, Old Europe
|
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/captive
new version now in portage , no mention of 64bit but there are fundemental changes to the kernel interface.
now uses fuse directly rather than LUFS . This means the kernel can umount it on shutdown like other native fs and this should give more hope for 64.
cant test I'm on athxp.
 _________________ Linux, because I'd rather own a free OS than steal one that's not worth paying for.
Gentoo because I'm a masochist
AthlonXP-M on A7N8X. Portage ~x86 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
viniciusferrao Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 28 Aug 2005 Posts: 83
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gentree wrote: | http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/captive
new version now in portage , no mention of 64bit but there are fundemental changes to the kernel interface.
now uses fuse directly rather than LUFS . This means the kernel can umount it on shutdown like other native fs and this should give more hope for 64.
cant test I'm on athxp.
 |
I will give a try  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bl4h n00b

Joined: 17 Feb 2006 Posts: 3 Location: Lithuania
|
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So did it work ?  _________________ AMD Athlon 64 3000+ 1.8Ghz OC To 2.4Ghz - Asus A8V DeLuxe - 2x PQI 512mb RAM - Sparkle GeForce 6600GT - Seagate SATA 200GB - Codegen BRIZA Modded ATX 400w - Gentoo Linux with KDE |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Maximus2000 Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 07 Oct 2004 Posts: 127 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have installed captive using captive-static-1.1.7.tar.gz from http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/captive/. I then did the captive-acquire-install after that I was able to read and write from my ntfs drive after mounting with captive-ntfs. _________________ Thanks
Maximus |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bl4h n00b

Joined: 17 Feb 2006 Posts: 3 Location: Lithuania
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maximus2000 wrote: | I have installed captive using captive-static-1.1.7.tar.gz from http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/captive/. I then did the captive-acquire-install after that I was able to read and write from my ntfs drive after mounting with captive-ntfs. |
On x64 ? Realy ? I will realy try it
thanks _________________ AMD Athlon 64 3000+ 1.8Ghz OC To 2.4Ghz - Asus A8V DeLuxe - 2x PQI 512mb RAM - Sparkle GeForce 6600GT - Seagate SATA 200GB - Codegen BRIZA Modded ATX 400w - Gentoo Linux with KDE |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bobobo Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Nov 2005 Posts: 122
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just tried (on x86_64), i have no idea why but it does work perfectly  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thedopefishlives Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 23 Nov 2005 Posts: 84
|
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Works perfectly. Can we get some ebuild magician to write us an ebuild for this, perhaps? captive-bin, we could call it. *crosses fingers*
EDIT: I did it myself... I don't know how to submit to Portage, though. Captive ebuild for Portage overlay
EDIT again: It was easier to call it "captive-static", by the way. My bad.
One last edit: I submitted my ebuild to bugzilla. I dunna know if the developers will accept it, though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bl4h n00b

Joined: 17 Feb 2006 Posts: 3 Location: Lithuania
|
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 5:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Congratulations, now you are ebuild magician  _________________ AMD Athlon 64 3000+ 1.8Ghz OC To 2.4Ghz - Asus A8V DeLuxe - 2x PQI 512mb RAM - Sparkle GeForce 6600GT - Seagate SATA 200GB - Codegen BRIZA Modded ATX 400w - Gentoo Linux with KDE |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|