Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Mozilla 1.2 final!
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours
View posts from last 7 days

Goto page 1, 2  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Reformist
Guru
Guru


Joined: 06 Oct 2002
Posts: 323

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 8:20 am    Post subject: Mozilla 1.2 final! Reply with quote

Eh...




Mozilla 1.2 final!!
http://www.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla1.2/
Finally! Woohoo!! Btw, as I posted in gnomedesktop.org, the new plugin spec (included in some masked gentoo's packages) installs everything with 1 command into where it should be, and all programs such as galeon, phoenix, and mozilla (that use netscape's plugin config) recognize the browser plugins! For once, it "just works." Check out packages.mask to see what I mean.
_________________
-Phil Crosby
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Binestar
n00b
n00b


Joined: 14 Nov 2002
Posts: 58

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyone have a working ebuild for mozilla-1.2?

Thanks,

Binestar
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cohesion
n00b
n00b


Joined: 27 Aug 2002
Posts: 24
Location: KC, MO, USA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 3:03 pm    Post subject: ebuild Reply with quote

How difficult would it be to just edit the 1.2b ebuild for this release? Where can I go to learn how to make ebuilds and submit them? :wink:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pilla
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 07 Aug 2002
Posts: 7729
Location: Underworld

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 3:16 pm    Post subject: Re: ebuild Reply with quote

I couldn't find the sources in their website... well, I haven't thoroughly searched it.

cohesion wrote:
How difficult would it be to just edit the 1.2b ebuild for this release? Where can I go to learn how to make ebuilds and submit them? :wink:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dioxmat
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 04 May 2002
Posts: 709
Location: /home/mat

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the sources always appear a few days later. you'll have to wait a bit more :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Binestar
n00b
n00b


Joined: 14 Nov 2002
Posts: 58

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I used rpm2tgz and turned the src.rpm from redhat into a tar.gz file. If you know how to make an ebuild I'm sure you can do the same to get the source.

Binestar
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pilla
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 07 Aug 2002
Posts: 7729
Location: Underworld

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice idea...

Binestar wrote:
I used rpm2tgz and turned the src.rpm from redhat into a tar.gz file. If you know how to make an ebuild I'm sure you can do the same to get the source.

Binestar
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cohesion
n00b
n00b


Joined: 27 Aug 2002
Posts: 24
Location: KC, MO, USA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2002 3:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The source files are on the mirror now.

http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.2/src/ :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
turi
n00b
n00b


Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2002 4:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, the source is there, but some patches are missing from the release. See
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182506. Probably better go with the CVS.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JohnY
Guru
Guru


Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Posts: 305

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 8:23 am    Post subject: modified the mozilla-1.2b.ebuild and compiled ... Reply with quote

FYI:

I modified the mozilla 1.2beta ebuild - removing 1 gkt2 patch and changing one variable according to a bug posted on bugs.gentoo.org, generated digests and compiled with gcc 2.95.3.
gentoo 1.2 unstable, fic503+ , 256mb, ibm 30gb, gnome 2.1b, xft2, fontconfig, voodoo3 pci ..... running 20mins so far fine ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eivinn
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 10 Jul 2002
Posts: 219
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 9:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If java works this would just be beautiful. That is the only thing that annoy me when using Mozilla 1.1, except for some random exits.

Anyone tried out Mozilla 1.2 and flash, etc?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mnemia
Guru
Guru


Joined: 17 May 2002
Posts: 476

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 10:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

eivinn wrote:
If java works this would just be beautiful. That is the only thing that annoy me when using Mozilla 1.1, except for some random exits.

Anyone tried out Mozilla 1.2 and flash, etc?

1.1 has always worked great for me with Java. Not sure why it didn't work for you... (I used Blackdown on gcc2.9.5 and then switched to the compiled Sun SDK and both have worked great with Moz 1.1).

I really do hope that the stability of 1.2 is a lot better than 1.2beta, though. 1.2beta has been far more unstable for me than 1.1 was (on Windows too).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wilke
n00b
n00b


Joined: 09 May 2002
Posts: 40
Location: University of Twente

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 11:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem with Java + Mozilla only exists when you use GCC 3.x - Sun JDK has been compiled with gcc 2.95.something, which is binary incompatible to GCC 3.2.

So for now, I think the only solution is to compile your own JDK, as explained in this thread. Compiling Java is a bitch though...I didn't succeed so far :(
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mnemia
Guru
Guru


Joined: 17 May 2002
Posts: 476

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 11:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm pretty sure the ebuild described in that thread is in the Portage tree now. I'm sure you have to download at least some of the files manually, due to Sun's licensing requirements, but the -r2 version in the Portage tree worked fine for me to upgrade the version I had already compiled by following that thread.

Only hangup is that ya need 2 GB (!) of free space to compile it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiganu
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 02 Oct 2002
Posts: 105
Location: Montreal

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 3:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rebuiding sun jdk & mozilla 1.1 worked for me with the ebuilds from about 2-3 weeks ago ...

There was a thread bescribing the procedure ... basically:
remove 'openmotif' and/or 'lesstif'
emerge java stuff (sun-jdk 1.4.1.01; sun-j2sdk 1.4.0-r2 right now)
emerge mozilla
emerge netscape-flash
emerge back in 'openmotif' and/or 'lesstif'

now I compiled mozilla 1.2 from cvs and java + flash worked very well, forgot to '--enable-xft' so all the fonts are crap :cry:

if that worked, a simple mod on the 1.1 emerge should work too ( ... well i'm kinda reaching here ... it worked for me that doesn't mean it'll work in other setups too :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
helmers
Guru
Guru


Joined: 16 Sep 2002
Posts: 553
Location: Stange, Norway

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 6:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a question. If I simply upgrade from 1.0.1 mozilla to 1.2, will I see speed improvement in Evolution HTML-messages? A friend told me he did.

Also, why don't portage install a newer version of Mozilla by default? All my Windows buddies are using 1.2, and I'm a bit sad to be stuck with 1.0.1. Also, why ain't there a "compile" version of Phoenix? The binary is okay, but not great.
_________________
C is for Cookies!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiganu
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 02 Oct 2002
Posts: 105
Location: Montreal

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 7:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

helmers wrote:
I have a question. If I simply upgrade from 1.0.1 mozilla to 1.2, will I see speed improvement in Evolution HTML-messages? A friend told me he did.

I thought that evolution uses gtkhtml for rendering (one of the problems w/ evolution 1.2 beeing that gtkhtml >=1.1 breaks compatibility w/ 1.0 )
helmers wrote:

Also, why don't portage install a newer version of Mozilla by default? All my Windows buddies are using 1.2, and I'm a bit sad to be stuck with 1.0.1. Also, why ain't there a "compile" version of Phoenix? The binary is okay, but not great.

That's no clear to me either ...
I had no problem compiling the cvs version ... mabe the maintainers have something to add right about here ? :D

ps. look through the forums, there is an ebuild for phoenix, if needed I can post the (older) copy I have.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yokem55
Guru
Guru


Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 360
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 9:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I got 1.2 final built last night. I used the source tarball linked to above, but before I used it I unpacked it in my home directory, and did a "cvs -r update MOZILLA_1_2_BRANCH" on that tree to get the fixes that made it into _BRANCH but not _RELEASE (what the downloaded tarball was). I then repacked up that tree, put it into my distfiles folder, made the ebuild digest, and emerged it. Turned out just peachy using gtk2 and xft.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
darktux
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Posts: 1086
Location: Coimbra, Portugal

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 10:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's working fine with gtk2? Grooooooooooovy! The previous version had some issues :(

When's the ebuild due to? :wink:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eivinn
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 10 Jul 2002
Posts: 219
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 10:13 am    Post subject: How to get Mozilla 1.2 Reply with quote

And the way to build a 1.2 release is described in this thread:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=24323&highlight=ebuild+digest

Please se the post by grandpajive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DArtagnan
l33t
l33t


Joined: 30 Apr 2002
Posts: 942
Location: Israel, Jerusalem

PostPosted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

$ emerge -s mozilla
Searching...
[ Results for search key : mozilla ]
[ Applications found : 1 ]

* net-www/mozilla
Latest version available: 1.0.1-r3
Latest version installed: 1.2_beta
Size of downloaded files: 29,448 kB
Homepage: http://www.mozilla.org
Description: The Mozilla Web Browser
_________________
All for one and one for All
--

MACPRO machine...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Azarah
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 20 Jun 2002
Posts: 81

PostPosted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiganu wrote:

helmers wrote:

Also, why don't portage install a newer version of Mozilla by default? All my Windows buddies are using 1.2, and I'm a bit sad to be stuck with 1.0.1. Also, why ain't there a "compile" version of Phoenix? The binary is okay, but not great.

That's no clear to me either ...
I had no problem compiling the cvs version ... mabe the maintainers have something to add right about here ? :D


Because we need to keep Galeon working as well ....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
darktux
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Posts: 1086
Location: Coimbra, Portugal

PostPosted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UH OH :x

Stop the emerging!!!

Quote:
Stop The Presses
We've discovered a bug in Mozilla 1.2 that can cause DHTML on some sites to fail. We plan to release Mozilla 1.2.1 with a fix shortly.


This was taken from Mozilla's website.
_________________
Lego my ego, and I'll lego your knowledge

www.tuxslare.org - My reborn website :P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
helmers
Guru
Guru


Joined: 16 Sep 2002
Posts: 553
Location: Stange, Norway

PostPosted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Azarah wrote:
Because we need to keep Galeon working as well ....


Except for that it crashes when submitting forms and stuff. :wink:
Anyways, I'd say Phoenix is the best for browsing right now. The fonts look a bit like crap, all to "mushy", but it is fast, and have the "TypeAhedFind" thing working great.

I don't really like mozilla, and the fact that you have to have mozilla installed to do a lot of things. Would it be okay to replace mozilla with phoenix? So that all the calls routed to the gecko engine would use the phoenix version?
_________________
C is for Cookies!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Azarah
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 20 Jun 2002
Posts: 81

PostPosted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 3:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

helmers wrote:

Except for that it crashes when submitting forms and stuff. :wink:
Anyways, I'd say Phoenix is the best for browsing right now. The fonts look a bit like crap, all to "mushy", but it is fast, and have the "TypeAhedFind" thing working great.


This seems to be fixed with a moz-1.2 and galeon-1.2.7 combination.

helmers wrote:

I don't really like mozilla, and the fact that you have to have mozilla installed to do a lot of things. Would it be okay to replace mozilla with phoenix? So that all the calls routed to the gecko engine would use the phoenix version?


I do not use phoenix, sorry.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum