View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Reformist Guru
Joined: 06 Oct 2002 Posts: 323
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 8:20 am Post subject: Mozilla 1.2 final! |
|
|
Eh...
Mozilla 1.2 final!!
http://www.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla1.2/
Finally! Woohoo!! Btw, as I posted in gnomedesktop.org, the new plugin spec (included in some masked gentoo's packages) installs everything with 1 command into where it should be, and all programs such as galeon, phoenix, and mozilla (that use netscape's plugin config) recognize the browser plugins! For once, it "just works." Check out packages.mask to see what I mean. _________________ -Phil Crosby |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Binestar n00b
Joined: 14 Nov 2002 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone have a working ebuild for mozilla-1.2?
Thanks,
Binestar |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cohesion n00b
Joined: 27 Aug 2002 Posts: 24 Location: KC, MO, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 3:03 pm Post subject: ebuild |
|
|
How difficult would it be to just edit the 1.2b ebuild for this release? Where can I go to learn how to make ebuilds and submit them? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pilla Bodhisattva
Joined: 07 Aug 2002 Posts: 7729 Location: Underworld
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 3:16 pm Post subject: Re: ebuild |
|
|
I couldn't find the sources in their website... well, I haven't thoroughly searched it.
cohesion wrote: | How difficult would it be to just edit the 1.2b ebuild for this release? Where can I go to learn how to make ebuilds and submit them? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dioxmat Bodhisattva
Joined: 04 May 2002 Posts: 709 Location: /home/mat
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the sources always appear a few days later. you'll have to wait a bit more :) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Binestar n00b
Joined: 14 Nov 2002 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used rpm2tgz and turned the src.rpm from redhat into a tar.gz file. If you know how to make an ebuild I'm sure you can do the same to get the source.
Binestar |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pilla Bodhisattva
Joined: 07 Aug 2002 Posts: 7729 Location: Underworld
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2002 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice idea...
Binestar wrote: | I used rpm2tgz and turned the src.rpm from redhat into a tar.gz file. If you know how to make an ebuild I'm sure you can do the same to get the source.
Binestar |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cohesion n00b
Joined: 27 Aug 2002 Posts: 24 Location: KC, MO, USA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
turi n00b
Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 16
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JohnY Guru
Joined: 26 Jul 2002 Posts: 305
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 8:23 am Post subject: modified the mozilla-1.2b.ebuild and compiled ... |
|
|
FYI:
I modified the mozilla 1.2beta ebuild - removing 1 gkt2 patch and changing one variable according to a bug posted on bugs.gentoo.org, generated digests and compiled with gcc 2.95.3.
gentoo 1.2 unstable, fic503+ , 256mb, ibm 30gb, gnome 2.1b, xft2, fontconfig, voodoo3 pci ..... running 20mins so far fine |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eivinn Apprentice
Joined: 10 Jul 2002 Posts: 219 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
If java works this would just be beautiful. That is the only thing that annoy me when using Mozilla 1.1, except for some random exits.
Anyone tried out Mozilla 1.2 and flash, etc? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mnemia Guru
Joined: 17 May 2002 Posts: 476
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
eivinn wrote: | If java works this would just be beautiful. That is the only thing that annoy me when using Mozilla 1.1, except for some random exits.
Anyone tried out Mozilla 1.2 and flash, etc? |
1.1 has always worked great for me with Java. Not sure why it didn't work for you... (I used Blackdown on gcc2.9.5 and then switched to the compiled Sun SDK and both have worked great with Moz 1.1).
I really do hope that the stability of 1.2 is a lot better than 1.2beta, though. 1.2beta has been far more unstable for me than 1.1 was (on Windows too). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wilke n00b
Joined: 09 May 2002 Posts: 40 Location: University of Twente
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
The problem with Java + Mozilla only exists when you use GCC 3.x - Sun JDK has been compiled with gcc 2.95.something, which is binary incompatible to GCC 3.2.
So for now, I think the only solution is to compile your own JDK, as explained in this thread. Compiling Java is a bitch though...I didn't succeed so far |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mnemia Guru
Joined: 17 May 2002 Posts: 476
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm pretty sure the ebuild described in that thread is in the Portage tree now. I'm sure you have to download at least some of the files manually, due to Sun's licensing requirements, but the -r2 version in the Portage tree worked fine for me to upgrade the version I had already compiled by following that thread.
Only hangup is that ya need 2 GB (!) of free space to compile it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiganu Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 02 Oct 2002 Posts: 105 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rebuiding sun jdk & mozilla 1.1 worked for me with the ebuilds from about 2-3 weeks ago ...
There was a thread bescribing the procedure ... basically:
remove 'openmotif' and/or 'lesstif'
emerge java stuff (sun-jdk 1.4.1.01; sun-j2sdk 1.4.0-r2 right now)
emerge mozilla
emerge netscape-flash
emerge back in 'openmotif' and/or 'lesstif'
now I compiled mozilla 1.2 from cvs and java + flash worked very well, forgot to '--enable-xft' so all the fonts are crap
if that worked, a simple mod on the 1.1 emerge should work too ( ... well i'm kinda reaching here ... it worked for me that doesn't mean it'll work in other setups too |
|
Back to top |
|
|
helmers Guru
Joined: 16 Sep 2002 Posts: 553 Location: Stange, Norway
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a question. If I simply upgrade from 1.0.1 mozilla to 1.2, will I see speed improvement in Evolution HTML-messages? A friend told me he did.
Also, why don't portage install a newer version of Mozilla by default? All my Windows buddies are using 1.2, and I'm a bit sad to be stuck with 1.0.1. Also, why ain't there a "compile" version of Phoenix? The binary is okay, but not great. _________________ C is for Cookies! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiganu Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 02 Oct 2002 Posts: 105 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
helmers wrote: | I have a question. If I simply upgrade from 1.0.1 mozilla to 1.2, will I see speed improvement in Evolution HTML-messages? A friend told me he did.
|
I thought that evolution uses gtkhtml for rendering (one of the problems w/ evolution 1.2 beeing that gtkhtml >=1.1 breaks compatibility w/ 1.0 )
helmers wrote: |
Also, why don't portage install a newer version of Mozilla by default? All my Windows buddies are using 1.2, and I'm a bit sad to be stuck with 1.0.1. Also, why ain't there a "compile" version of Phoenix? The binary is okay, but not great. |
That's no clear to me either ...
I had no problem compiling the cvs version ... mabe the maintainers have something to add right about here ?
ps. look through the forums, there is an ebuild for phoenix, if needed I can post the (older) copy I have. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yokem55 Guru
Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Posts: 360 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I got 1.2 final built last night. I used the source tarball linked to above, but before I used it I unpacked it in my home directory, and did a "cvs -r update MOZILLA_1_2_BRANCH" on that tree to get the fixes that made it into _BRANCH but not _RELEASE (what the downloaded tarball was). I then repacked up that tree, put it into my distfiles folder, made the ebuild digest, and emerged it. Turned out just peachy using gtk2 and xft. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
darktux Veteran
Joined: 16 Nov 2002 Posts: 1086 Location: Coimbra, Portugal
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2002 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's working fine with gtk2? Grooooooooooovy! The previous version had some issues
When's the ebuild due to? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eivinn Apprentice
Joined: 10 Jul 2002 Posts: 219 Location: Norway
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DArtagnan l33t
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 942 Location: Israel, Jerusalem
|
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
$ emerge -s mozilla
Searching...
[ Results for search key : mozilla ]
[ Applications found : 1 ]
* net-www/mozilla
Latest version available: 1.0.1-r3
Latest version installed: 1.2_beta
Size of downloaded files: 29,448 kB
Homepage: http://www.mozilla.org
Description: The Mozilla Web Browser _________________ All for one and one for All
--
MACPRO machine... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Azarah Retired Dev
Joined: 20 Jun 2002 Posts: 81
|
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tiganu wrote: |
helmers wrote: |
Also, why don't portage install a newer version of Mozilla by default? All my Windows buddies are using 1.2, and I'm a bit sad to be stuck with 1.0.1. Also, why ain't there a "compile" version of Phoenix? The binary is okay, but not great. |
That's no clear to me either ...
I had no problem compiling the cvs version ... mabe the maintainers have something to add right about here ?
|
Because we need to keep Galeon working as well .... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
darktux Veteran
Joined: 16 Nov 2002 Posts: 1086 Location: Coimbra, Portugal
|
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UH OH
Stop the emerging!!!
Quote: | Stop The Presses
We've discovered a bug in Mozilla 1.2 that can cause DHTML on some sites to fail. We plan to release Mozilla 1.2.1 with a fix shortly. |
This was taken from Mozilla's website. _________________ Lego my ego, and I'll lego your knowledge
www.tuxslare.org - My reborn website |
|
Back to top |
|
|
helmers Guru
Joined: 16 Sep 2002 Posts: 553 Location: Stange, Norway
|
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Azarah wrote: | Because we need to keep Galeon working as well .... |
Except for that it crashes when submitting forms and stuff.
Anyways, I'd say Phoenix is the best for browsing right now. The fonts look a bit like crap, all to "mushy", but it is fast, and have the "TypeAhedFind" thing working great.
I don't really like mozilla, and the fact that you have to have mozilla installed to do a lot of things. Would it be okay to replace mozilla with phoenix? So that all the calls routed to the gecko engine would use the phoenix version? _________________ C is for Cookies! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Azarah Retired Dev
Joined: 20 Jun 2002 Posts: 81
|
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
helmers wrote: |
Except for that it crashes when submitting forms and stuff.
Anyways, I'd say Phoenix is the best for browsing right now. The fonts look a bit like crap, all to "mushy", but it is fast, and have the "TypeAhedFind" thing working great. |
This seems to be fixed with a moz-1.2 and galeon-1.2.7 combination.
helmers wrote: |
I don't really like mozilla, and the fact that you have to have mozilla installed to do a lot of things. Would it be okay to replace mozilla with phoenix? So that all the calls routed to the gecko engine would use the phoenix version? |
I do not use phoenix, sorry. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|