| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gian
Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 212
Location: Europe
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:57 pm Post subject: still some problems going to 2004.3 |
 |
|
I'm getting this error updating to the 3.4 gcc...
| Code: |
root # emerge -p world
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating world dependencies ...done!
[ebuild NS ] sys-devel/gcc-3.4.2-r2
[ebuild N ] sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.4
root# emerge gcc
....lots of output...
checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... /var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.2-r2/work/build/gcc/xgcc -B/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.2-r2/work/build/gcc/ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -m32
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs.
If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'.
See `config.log' for more details.
make: *** [configure-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1
!!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-3.4.2-r2 failed.
!!! Function gcc_do_make, Line 1085, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.
|
dont see nothing strange in my configure.log...
anyone has seen something similar ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuhrscher
Guru
Joined: 29 Dec 2003
Posts: 498
Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Try to comile gcc with "FEATURES=-sandbox". That should fix your problem... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gian
Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 212
Location: Europe
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 9:37 pm Post subject: thank you!!!!! |
|
|
thank you !!!
that did it ... but, just to avoid silly questions in the future... how could I have deduced that answer by myself... (in other words... how did you know that the sandbox thing would have worked ?!?!) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spielc
Guru
Joined: 20 Apr 2004
Posts: 452
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Usually searching the forum or the internet might give you some answers... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gian
Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 212
Location: Europe
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 11:58 pm Post subject: ok... |
|
|
while I agree that stupid questions (like mine) should righteously receive commensurable answers... (and I also agree that the suboptimal way my question was posed could most easily induce anyone in chosing such strategy),
I was asking what conneced the -sandbox feature to the specific error I was receiving from the compiler (or, better, where I could find way to relate things one to the other... I'm happy to apply "precooked" solutions, but if there is any chance I can understand "things" I tend to be happier... otherwise I would have used windoz ... but I prefer not) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spielc
Guru
Joined: 20 Apr 2004
Posts: 452
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Well in my case: I had that problem too and i guess Kurscher came about that prob too somehow... Btw. the question wasn't stupid, that's what the forum (especially the AMD64-Forum cuz the 64-bit technology is still something new and not so common...) is here for... I found the solution by asking here in the forum myself and i was pointed to the gentoo-bugzilla. In this special case i don't think that the sandbox can be connected to the solution: disable the sandbox! But maybe i am wrong??!??! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gian
Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 212
Location: Europe
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
!!!
don't take me to seriously !!! 
(but I still wander what the sandbox has to do with the problem I/we had)
ciao |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Gentoo on AMD64
