| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
thoffmeyer
Apprentice
Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Posts: 208
Location: GMT -5 Hours
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 8:08 pm Post subject: Gnome 2.10 |
 |
|
mod edit -curtis119, I made this sticky until 2.10 goes stable
NOTICE: I have it all runny screenshot: here
Old news now, it came out yesterday, I am emerging it now, if you people are lazy, I will post my package.unmask for you.
Click here for my package.unmask.
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
_________________
Conrad Guide, Current Maintainer
Join us on IRC
Server: irc.freenode.net
Channel: #conrad
Last edited by thoffmeyer on Wed Mar 16, 2005 2:59 pm; edited 5 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thoffmeyer
Apprentice
Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Posts: 208
Location: GMT -5 Hours
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Weee, gnome 2.10 comes out tomorrow. 
_________________
Conrad Guide, Current Maintainer
Join us on IRC
Server: irc.freenode.net
Channel: #conrad |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WladyX
Guru
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 503
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I hope evolution 2.2.0 will portage soon 
_________________
We are not alone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Locarius
n00b
Joined: 16 Apr 2004
Posts: 71
Location: Ottawa, Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hits portage a [edit]month[/edit] later? You mean as non-'~'? Lame. I really want to have the ebuild ASAP.
Last edited by Locarius on Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:07 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
{{Azrael}}
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Posts: 117
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Locarius wrote: | | Hits portage a week later? You mean as non-'~'? Lame. I really want to have the ebuild ASAP. |
If you want to use masked packages go ahead. But I prefer to use stable releases, and I'de be prepared to wait for it, so long as I can expect it to work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mhennings
n00b
Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Posts: 15
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With 2.6 there was more significant improvement.
Seems as if most changes are under the hood again with 2.10.
[edit]
I am happy about the release anyway. Just had hopes for more than this.
[/edit] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ferg
Guru
Joined: 15 Nov 2002
Posts: 536
Location: Cambridge, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:37 pm Post subject: ebuilds out, but masked |
|
|
Hi all,
the ebuilds are out and masked.
There's an error in "libglade-2.5.0.ebuild". A required patch has the wrong version number. Either the patch in gnome-base/libglade/files is wrong, or it's got the wrong version in the ebuild.
Regardless I changed the following in the ebuild:
| Code: |
epatch ${FILESDIR}/Makefile.in.am-2.4.1-xmlcatalog.patch
|
to
| Code: |
epatch ${FILESDIR}/Makefile.in.am-2.4.2-xmlcatalog.patch
|
..and it compiles OK.
Obviously whether this works or not is another matter!! Fingers crossed.
Normally I'd wait at least a few days after the ebuilds come out, but I'm bored, as at home sick..... So here goes.......!
Cheers
Ferg
PS i suppose I should look into submitting this as an ebuild bug. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ferg
Guru
Joined: 15 Nov 2002
Posts: 536
Location: Cambridge, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:51 pm Post subject: Doh! |
|
|
You know it just occurred to me that a reason for masking ebuilds as well as for testing purposes, is when all the dependencies are not met.
So I'm expecting that quite a few packages are not quite ready.
Doh! Serves me right for doing things when I don't feel quite well.
Cheers
Ferg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sanderfox
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 101
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another package that fails to build: libgnomeprint....
While emerging:
| Code: | checking for libgnomecups-1.0 >= 0.2.0... Requested 'libgnomecups-1.0 >= 0.2.0' but version of libgnomecups is 0.1.14
configure: error: Library requirements (libgnomecups-1.0 >= 0.2.0) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. |
Anyone an idea how to fix this one ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bushwakko
Guru
Joined: 25 Mar 2003
Posts: 495
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I got the same libgnomeprint problem. Seems they haven't included a new ebuild for that dependancy.
_________________
Macbook Pro 15"
Core 2 Duo 2,33ghz
2gb Ram
ATI Mobility x1600 256mb |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ferg
Guru
Joined: 15 Nov 2002
Posts: 536
Location: Cambridge, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bushwakko wrote: | | I got the same libgnomeprint problem. Seems they haven't included a new ebuild for that dependancy. |
Yeah it's exactly what I meant earlier. I know with previous major Gnome releases they kept it all masked until all ebuilds were in there. I , stupidly, jumped the gun!!! 
Incidentally there is a much newer ebuild for libgnomecups, 0.1.8, although not recent enough to work for this.
Looks like waiting........!
Cheers
Ferg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sanderfox
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 101
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah...let's hope they include an updated ebuild soon.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gentoonie
Apprentice
Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 205
Location: near Munich | Bavaria | Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This samba shares manager looks kick ass! Would be cool if some of you who test 2.10 leaves a statement about it
_________________
Do you know the secret hand shake - you best use it.
GCC 4, Kernel 2.6.14-ck7, NPTL |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Leo Lausren
Apprentice
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 198
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sanderfox wrote: | Another package that fails to build: libgnomeprint....
Anyone an idea how to fix this one ? |
Just copying libgnomecups-0.1.14.ebuild to my overlay and rename it to libgnomecups-0.2.0.ebuild, seems to work allright.
_________________
Blog: common sense – nonsense |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ehud
n00b
Joined: 15 May 2004
Posts: 69
Location: Tel Aviv
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just unmasked and emerged evolution-2.2
It emrges fine and seems to work well with my gnome-2.8, so if anyone needs to try the new version it's possible without upgrading the whole gnome. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thoffmeyer
Apprentice
Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Posts: 208
Location: GMT -5 Hours
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mmmm it comes out today guys.. *crosses fingers*
_________________
Conrad Guide, Current Maintainer
Join us on IRC
Server: irc.freenode.net
Channel: #conrad |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ferg
Guru
Joined: 15 Nov 2002
Posts: 536
Location: Cambridge, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well apart from the two minor ebuild issues mentioned above, and the fact that I could not get bug-buddy emerged (I had to manually upgrade a few packages, rather than simply emerge -u world), it all seems fine.
The menus have been reorganised. Call me stupid, but it took me a while to find preferences...... and what on earth is Edutainment?
Otherwise a fairly painless upgrade. Nautilus "seems" to be faster, especially at previewing. Although this is a purely subjective opinion and I also switched to Gamin recently, so the speed increase could be due to this.
It's overwritten my mouse cursors settings, and left the default X one in there. I'll have to remember what setting I need to add in the gconf registry.
Otherwise cool! Well done Gnome ebuild maintainers!
Cheers
Ferg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thoffmeyer
Apprentice
Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Posts: 208
Location: GMT -5 Hours
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah but its ~M...
_________________
Conrad Guide, Current Maintainer
Join us on IRC
Server: irc.freenode.net
Channel: #conrad |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hypnos
Advocate
Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 2889
Location: Omnipresent
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thoffmeyer wrote: | | Yeah but its ~M... |
It takes a few weeks to get to just "~". Foser, the ranking Gentoo GNOME developer, waits until bug reports and brown bag/followup patches from upstream both dry up.
I appreciate it, because GNOME is production-ware for me.
It's declared "stable" when the condition above persists for another few weeks.
_________________
Personal overlay | Simple backup scheme |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Goalie_Ca
Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jan 2003
Posts: 156
Location: Vancouver,B.C
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've been pretty following a lot of this on planet over the past while. While this release is nice i'm more looking forward to 2.12. There is great focus on memory reduction and I'm pretty sure that tools like gstreamer and dbus etc. will be more mature and widely used. Same deal goes for cairo's use in gtk and the deprecation of libgnomecanvas and others.
_________________
Jabber: goalieca[AT]jabber.fr
Beautiful Vancouver, B.C.
http://www.sfu.ca/~rdickie/images/sig_small.jpg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kensai
Guru
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 568
Location: Puerto Rico
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This morning I started to get some 2.8.2 that were marked stable and now I see 2.10 is out well I must wait till there are no problems emerging it and then try it. Does it include COmposites support of Xorg?
_________________
Gentoo: Gigabyte: nFORCE 2: nVIDIA GeForce 6600: AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Perspective of a Thinking Human Being |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
c0bblers
Guru
Joined: 28 Mar 2003
Posts: 403
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ferg wrote: | well apart from the two minor ebuild issues mentioned above, and the fact that I could not get bug-buddy emerged (I had to manually upgrade a few packages, rather than simply emerge -u world), it all seems fine.
The menus have been reorganised. Call me stupid, but it took me a while to find preferences...... and what on earth is Edutainment?
Otherwise a fairly painless upgrade. Nautilus "seems" to be faster, especially at previewing. Although this is a purely subjective opinion and I also switched to Gamin recently, so the speed increase could be due to this.
It's overwritten my mouse cursors settings, and left the default X one in there. I'll have to remember what setting I need to add in the gconf registry.
Otherwise cool! Well done Gnome ebuild maintainers!
Cheers
Ferg |
I believe they've removed bonobo layout stuff from from nautilus to speed it up, though I'm not totally sure. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pjp
Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 20067
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Any chance there's a "power user" option yet? I miss the pre-simplified Gnome. I have no problem with the simplification, just the elimination of configurability.
_________________
Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
psofa
Guru
Joined: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 485
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
can somebody explain me how do i unmask all this thing? thanks
--Never mind it was in package.mask
_________________
psofa
Last edited by psofa on Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:29 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ecoffey
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 122
Location: Colorado
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Goalie_Ca wrote: | | I've been pretty following a lot of this on planet over the past while. While this release is nice i'm more looking forward to 2.12. There is great focus on memory reduction and I'm pretty sure that tools like gstreamer and dbus etc. will be more mature and widely used. Same deal goes for cairo's use in gtk and the deprecation of libgnomecanvas and others. |
Yeah, the memory reduction stuff seems pretty cool (I was thinking about chasing after one of those bounties  ). The Gstreamer and D-BUS intergration should be cool and hopefully the gstreamer docs get a little better (I know what you're going to say, but I don't have the time to do it), cause I tried messing around with gstreamer and the docs were horrible. Cairo is also going to be effing sweet. You should check out the development versions of Enlightment too, to see what is possible for a 3D backend toolkit
I don't think they are going to deprecate anything until they fork the 3.x branch. The point being they have to maintain ABI/API stability across all 2.x releases. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Desktop Environments
