Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
2.6.7_rc2-love1 aka "Texas Shotguns of Play Doh"
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
danone
Guru
Guru


Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 398
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 1:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Try to enable SMP and smt support and it works...so far the only thing i change at your config here..and well it compile ---> these effect I saw the second time with nick sched..my friend has also AMD machine and I turned of the SMP..cause not need ...then i got these errors too...I know why I use the Intel Prescott (but still waste of money and thermal issues)
_________________
[:: Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 ]::[ Mainboard: ASUS P5B Deluxe ]::[ GPU: nVidia 7900GTO ::]
[:: RAM: HyperX DDR2 800 ]::[ Samsung SH-183A SATA:: CREATiVE X-Fi XtremeMusic :: ]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaribbeanKnight
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 240
Location: Earth -> Europe -> Belgium -> Diest

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 2:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

it compiled succesfully now, after enabling smp (but not smt).. on my way to booting em now..
thanx for the help! :)
_________________
...we ain't shit...
Linux User #353893
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OneOfOne
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 May 2003
Posts: 368
Location: Alexandria, Egypt

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 2:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

danone wrote:
Sorry but I updated the patch with reiser4 support!
You can get iogl-sources @
http://www.f-mt.de/linux/iogl-sources/iogl-sources-2.6.7_rc-r2.ebuild

in the patch are
Nicksched v31
reiser4
bootsplash-2.6.7-rc2-r2.diff
supermount
vesafb-refresh-patch-2.6.6
some odds of pciids ---> started a thread to collect pciids and usbids ---> I would like to extend the pciid database:-)
some fixes from lkml.org

cool, good news
but do you use reiser4?
i tried latest auto-snapshot on top of a clean rc2-mm1 and fixed 2 small hunks, the problem is it oops while booting.
@xfs problems : try enabling "Quick sort" in "Library routines"
@unknown_nmi_panic problems: enable APIC or totally disable acpi, it's -mm's fault and i thought i fixed it but looks like i missed something.
@reiser4 people: i'm dying to get reiser4 as well and i can put but i cant promise that it'll work.
it's 5:50am here and i haven't slept yet, i promise a new love when i wake up.

peace
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaribbeanKnight
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 240
Location: Earth -> Europe -> Belgium -> Diest

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 3:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

danone: tried your kernel, but sadly i have to confirm what oneofone thought, reiser4 gives an oops on boot... :? so i can't use it as my / is reiser4..
_________________
...we ain't shit...
Linux User #353893
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Admiral LSD
Guru
Guru


Joined: 27 Jun 2003
Posts: 522
Location: Northam, W.A., Australia

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 3:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cocoliso wrote:
i get this error while compiling...

LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
fs/built-in.o(.text+0x137e23): In function `xfs_attr_shortform_list':
: undefined reference to `qsort'
fs/built-in.o(.text+0x1589a7): In function `xfs_dir2_sf_to_block':
: undefined reference to `qsort'
fs/built-in.o(.text+0x161859): In function `xfs_dir_shortform_getdents':
: undefined reference to `qsort'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1


any ideas?


I got something similar to this when I first tried compiling vanilla 2.6.7-rc2-mm1 (not -rc2-love1). I traced it to a couple of patches that made xfs use the kernel qsort instead of its own which had been left out of -rc2-mm1 because, according to Andrew, the "broke". After a bit of fiddling to make them apply to -rc2-mm1 it compiled fine. These patches are in -rc2-love1 though so I can't explain why you're still getting this error. I can't replicate the problem here on -rc2-love1 so all I can suggest is that you make sure the kernel Quick Sort is enabled (though selecting XFS *should* do this for you).
_________________
Wasurenaide...
...watashi ga iru koto o.
Itsudatte soba ni iru yo.

Registered Linux user #319839
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
numerodix
l33t
l33t


Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 743
Location: nl.eu

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 7:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I get this error for ipw2100, something missing? I have hostap-driver-0.1.3 installed.

Code:
  CC [M]  drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100/ipw2100_main.o
In file included from drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100/ieee80211.h:221,
                 from drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100/ipw2100.h:45,
                 from drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100/ipw2100_main.c:199:
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100/ieee80211_crypt.h:27:26: hostap_crypt.h: No such fi 
le or directory
make[4]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100/ipw2100_main.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100] Error 2
make[2]: *** [drivers/net/wireless] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2

_________________
undvd - ripping dvds should be as simple as unzip
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bAnTAi
n00b
n00b


Joined: 22 Dec 2003
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 7:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Which version of love-sources would you say is the last stable release? I am currently running 2.6.5-love5 and wondering whether i should upgrade to 2.6.6. But reading the forums it seems people had problems with 2.6.6-love5 (actually i dont think it was an official release). Should i just wait for 2.6.7-loveX?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
primero.gentoo
Guru
Guru


Joined: 23 Dec 2003
Posts: 402

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 8:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi, i was wondering ... with this incredible number of different patchsets, how dow you test, benchmark and rate them?

I would like to try some of them , i'm using love-sources 2.6.6-love5 now, and test them about speed and reactivity , how would you do this?
Until now the only "test" i've made is using the kernel and check if it "seems good", but i would like something more "scientific"... hany hint? :-)
bye
_________________
"Linux, the choice of a GNU generation"
==Micro$oft - just say NO==
(L#USER 353039)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pink
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Jul 2003
Posts: 1062

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 8:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Win4Lin FIX:

Code:
  CC      mm/truncate.o
  CC      mm/vmscan.o
mm/vmscan.c: In function `shrink_all_memory':
mm/vmscan.c:1196: error: `priority' undeclared (first use in this function)
mm/vmscan.c:1196: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
mm/vmscan.c:1196: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [mm/vmscan.o] Error 1
make: *** [mm] Error 2


For those who are having trouble with the above compilation errors, it is a win4lin problem. The #ifdef CONFIG_MKI block of code in vmscan.c is in the wrong place, it needs to be moved as follows:

cut (we need a copy of it so cut is easiest) from line 1196:
Code:

#ifdef CONFIG_MKI
      if (priority < DEF_PRIORITY) {
         int mki_swap_pri = (priority < (DEF_PRIORITY - 1)) ?
             MKI_HARD_PRIORITY : MKI_NORMAL_PRIORITY;

         CALL_MKI_HOOK(MKI_HOOK_SWAP, (void *) mki_swap_pri,
             (void *) 0);
      }
#endif


and paste the block in vmscan.c in at line 938.
(just after)
Code:
   for (priority = DEF_PRIORITY; priority >= 0; priority--) {
      int threshold;


It compiles that way, I can't test it (reiser4 partition) but if someone can let me know it works (it should do, no reason why not).

P.S. Can anyone link me to somewhere I can learn to make a patch? Seems odd as I do like to fix the win4lin problems and love fiddling with the kernel but am not really sure how to start posting a patch ( :oops: )
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Redeeman
l33t
l33t


Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 957
Location: Denmark

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 9:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

everyone, do not use v31, but the latest v30g!
_________________
Sandberg Enterprises
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PrakashP
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 1246
Location: C.C.A.A., Germania

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 9:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, in my latest tests the default O(1) scheduler got much better. In fact for me it seems to be smoother than Nichsched - even having reniced X. Esp if I have something running in the background sucking up CPU, Nicksched makes the overall responseness worse than O(1). I am currently on plain mm kernel - just for the feel...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PrakashP
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 1246
Location: C.C.A.A., Germania

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Something Nvidia related I have noticed:

Thanks to the newer 53.36 ebuilds, which don't need that module stuff reversed, I guess, I can now run the Nvidia driver *with* regparm enabled! I modified that ebuild for 53.41 and took the patch from minion.de. Furthermore the mm kernels now don't seem to enforce 4k stacks, so it runs for me straight out of the box. :) Very nice!

I tried the regparm stuff earlier, but it didn't work with an older version of the ebuild. If anyone wants this one, tell, then I'll post it in the nvidia thread...

BTW, since I apply that regparm patch for Nvidia driver and use kernels>2.6.6 I never had tha Nvidia related "soft" lock-ups with baddness in pci-serach bla anymore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asimon
l33t
l33t


Joined: 27 Jun 2002
Posts: 979
Location: Germany, Old Europe

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 9:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PrakashKC wrote:
Well, in my latest tests the default O(1) scheduler got much better. In fact for me it seems to be smoother than Nichsched - even having reniced X. Esp if I have something running in the background sucking up CPU, Nicksched makes the overall responseness worse than O(1). I am currently on plain mm kernel - just for the feel...


I expierienced the same. Under the last two or three love-sources my desktop seemed less snappy than with older love-sources or current plain mm, especially during higher load.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cato`
Guru
Guru


Joined: 03 Jun 2002
Posts: 430
Location: Norway, Trondheim

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 10:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dmesg
Code:

hdc: max request size: 128KiB
hdc: 28229040 sectors (14453 MB) w/462KiB Cache, CHS=28005/16/63, UDMA(33)
hdc: cache flushes supported
 hdc: hdc1
hdd: ATAPI 24X CD-ROM CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:00:02.2[C] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:02.2 to 64
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: irq 11, pci mem e0e16000
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
irq 11: nobody cared!
 [<c01065ae>] dump_stack+0x1e/0x20
 [<c0107a1b>] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x90
 [<c0107b14>] note_interrupt+0x64/0xa0
 [<c0107daf>] do_IRQ+0x12f/0x140
 [<c010619c>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
 [<c011d03c>] do_softirq+0x2c/0x30
 [<c0107d89>] do_IRQ+0x109/0x140
 [<c010619c>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
 [<c02ce499>] ehci_start+0x2d9/0x370
 [<c02c4bc3>] usb_hcd_pci_probe+0x2a3/0x4e0
 [<c02110bb>] pci_device_probe_static+0x4b/0x60
 [<c021110c>] __pci_device_probe+0x3c/0x50
 [<c021114c>] pci_device_probe+0x2c/0x50
 [<c026343d>] bus_match+0x3d/0x70
 [<c026356a>] driver_attach+0x5a/0x90
 [<c0263861>] bus_add_driver+0xa1/0xc0
 [<c0263d11>] driver_register+0x31/0x40
 [<c02113ab>] pci_register_driver+0x5b/0x80
 [<c0480725>] init+0x25/0x40
 [<c046a7fc>] do_initcalls+0x2c/0xc0
 [<c0100458>] init+0x38/0x150
 [<c01042b1>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x14
 
handlers:
[<c02c0b20>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x70)
Disabling IRQ #11
PCI: cache line size of 64 is not supported by device 0000:00:02.2
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: USB 2.0 enabled, EHCI 1.00, driver 2004-May-10
hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 1-0:1.0: 6 ports detected


System is nforce2 with nptl, hotplug and udev. Could someone explain what this means?
_________________
Don't mess with the Penguin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
danone
Guru
Guru


Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 398
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i can access my reiser4 partition..but my root is xfs
_________________
[:: Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 ]::[ Mainboard: ASUS P5B Deluxe ]::[ GPU: nVidia 7900GTO ::]
[:: RAM: HyperX DDR2 800 ]::[ Samsung SH-183A SATA:: CREATiVE X-Fi XtremeMusic :: ]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
numerodix
l33t
l33t


Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 743
Location: nl.eu

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 12:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

numerodix wrote:
I get this error for ipw2100, something missing? I have hostap-driver-0.1.3 installed.

Code:
  CC [M]  drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100/ipw2100_main.o
In file included from drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100/ieee80211.h:221,
                 from drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100/ipw2100.h:45,
                 from drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100/ipw2100_main.c:199:
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100/ieee80211_crypt.h:27:26: hostap_crypt.h: No such fi 
le or directory
make[4]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100/ipw2100_main.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100] Error 2
make[2]: *** [drivers/net/wireless] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2


For the record, I did successfully install the ipw2100 package in portage, v0.44 and from what I can tell the driver works fine. Something amiss with the patching in love it seems.
_________________
undvd - ripping dvds should be as simple as unzip
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
primero.gentoo
Guru
Guru


Joined: 23 Dec 2003
Posts: 402

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 1:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does anyone know how to apply Systrace Patch to 2.6.7-rc2-love1 ?

i've tried to aply but i get this output:

Code:

Zapata linux-2.6.7-rc2-love1 # cat /tmp/systrace-linux-2.6.1-v1.5.diff |patch -p1 --dry-run
patching file drivers/systrace/linux_sysent.c
patching file drivers/systrace/Makefile
patching file drivers/systrace/policy.c
patching file drivers/systrace/systrace.c
patching file drivers/systrace/systrace-private.h
patching file include/linux/queue.h
patching file include/linux/systrace.h
patching file drivers/Makefile
Hunk #1 FAILED at 50.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/Makefile.rej
patching file security/Kconfig
patching file drivers/systrace/Kconfig
patching file include/linux/sched.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 400.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/sched.h.rej
patching file kernel/exit.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 22.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 773.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/exit.c.rej
patching file kernel/fork.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 30.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1221.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/fork.c.rej
patching file arch/i386/kernel/entry.S
Hunk #1 FAILED at 264.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 302.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/i386/kernel/entry.S.rej
Zapata linux-2.6.7-rc2-love1 #



I've tried to solve by myself but i'm not so used to do this .... and did not succed :roll:

So if anyone know something ... please please ... i really need it :)

Bye
_________________
"Linux, the choice of a GNU generation"
==Micro$oft - just say NO==
(L#USER 353039)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gentii
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 306

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bAnTAi wrote:
Which version of love-sources would you say is the last stable release? I am currently running 2.6.5-love5 and wondering whether i should upgrade to 2.6.6. But reading the forums it seems people had problems with 2.6.6-love5 (actually i dont think it was an official release). Should i just wait for 2.6.7-loveX?


2.6.7 rc1 is just great for me :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
michaelarch
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 08 May 2003
Posts: 87
Location: Huntsville, AL

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 2:28 pm    Post subject: nvidia Reply with quote

Quote:
I tried the regparm stuff earlier, but it didn't work with an older version of the ebuild. If anyone wants this one, tell, then I'll post it in the nvidia thread...

Would you please post it, greatly appreciated! Thanks and have a great day!

Michael
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PrakashP
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 1246
Location: C.C.A.A., Germania

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, take a look here:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=1205890#1205890
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
S_aIN_t
Guru
Guru


Joined: 11 May 2002
Posts: 488
Location: Ottawa

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 2:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

have to give this one a shot as soon as i have some time.
_________________
"That which is overdesigned, too highly
specific, anticipates outcome; the anicipation of
outcome guatantees, if not failure, the
absence of grace."
- William Gibson, "All Tomorrow's Parties"
----
http://petro.tanreisoftware.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
michaelarch
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 08 May 2003
Posts: 87
Location: Huntsville, AL

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PrakashKC wrote:
Ok, take a look here:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=1205890#1205890


Thanks!!! Have a good one!!

Michael
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OneOfOne
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 May 2003
Posts: 368
Location: Alexandria, Egypt

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 5:00 pm    Post subject: 2.6.7_rc2-love2 aka "The dead shall raise" Reply with quote

sorry about the last love guys.
Quote:

v30g.gz | Nick's scheduler v30g (v31 was dropped by him)
nickvm-267r2m2.gz | Nick's VM work
2.6.x-bring-up-compiler-option.patch.bz2 | extra CFLAGS hack
acpi-dsdt-initrd-patch-v0.5-2.6.5-eric.patch.bz2 | Custom acpi dsdt patch
bootsplash-3.1.4-2.6.7-rc2-r2.diff.bz2 | bootsplash
acx100-0.2.0pre7-linux2.6.2.diff.bz2 | ACX100 Driver (upped to _pre8 by hand)
orinoco-cvs-20040527.patch.bz2 | orinoco patch
squashfs2.0-linux-2.6.6.patch.bz2 | SquishFS v2
subfs-genstef.bz2 | SubFS (death to supermount!)
acerhk.patch.bz2 | acer hotkeys
BadRAM-2.6.5.2.patch.bz2 | a workaround bad ram
bd-claim.patch.bz2 | EVMS fix
config-nr-tty-devices.patch.bz2 | for a cleaner /dev
force-config_regparm-to-y.patch.bz2 | reversed for binary drivers' sake
ipw2100-0.45 | new ipw2100
genpatches/2110_bcm5700_broadcom_gigabit_drvr_11272003.patch | bcm5700 driver
genpatches/4105_lirc_infrared-2.6.5-rc2.patch | lirc patch
genpatches/4710_lufs-0.9.7-2.6.0-test9.patch | lufs
genpatches/4905_speakup_accessibility.patch | speakup patch
iriver.patch.bz2 | iriver
iteraid_1.44.patch.bz2 | Giga Raid
linux-2.6.0.dxr3.20031229.diff.bz2 | dxr (is there's a new patch somewhere?)
linux-2.6.4-Walken.diff.bz2 | the Walken bootlogo
love_ppm.patch.bz2 | the love bootlogo
packet-2.6.5.patch.bz2 | Packet CD/DVD writing
*can't find* linux-2.6.6-mppe-mppc-1.0.patch.gz | searching for it, the old one is broken
patch-2.4.x-vesafb-rrc.bz2 | vesafb refresh hack, couldn't find the new one
patch-2.6.4-amd76x_pm.bz2 | AMD Power NOW!
sii-3512-update.patch.bz2 | siimage patch
viafb_02.diff.bz2 | via framebuffer
via-v4l-1.4a-drm.patch.bz2 | via v4l stuff
menuconfig-NAME-v1.0.patch.bz2 | name in menuconfig patch
win4lin.patch.bz2 | send your hugs and kisses to PickledOnion

this one have the new nicksched and nickvm.
win4lin compiles, bootsplash works fine and life is good :D
i can't find the new vesafb, can someone email it to me or something?
notes: http://oneofone.limitlessfx.com/love-sources/love-sources-2.6.7_rc2-r2.notes
ebuild : http://oneofone.limitlessfx.com/love-sources/love-sources-2.6.7_rc2-r2.ebuild
patch : http://oneofone.limitlessfx.com/love-sources/2.6.7-rc2-love2.bz2
enjoy!
peace
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
danone
Guru
Guru


Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 398
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

maybe i'am blind but where is the option to enble bootsplash the menu is empty like the one in pnp..damn i need my bootsplash since i use 1600x1200 res:-( EDIT;WHERE I ENABLE BOOTSPLASH..help the option isnt there
the vesapatch i put at my homepage @
[url]
http://www.f-mt.de/linux/vesafb-rrc-0.1.6-2.6.x.tar.bz2
[/url]
_________________
[:: Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 ]::[ Mainboard: ASUS P5B Deluxe ]::[ GPU: nVidia 7900GTO ::]
[:: RAM: HyperX DDR2 800 ]::[ Samsung SH-183A SATA:: CREATiVE X-Fi XtremeMusic :: ]


Last edited by danone on Thu Jun 03, 2004 5:25 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kali
n00b
n00b


Joined: 30 Sep 2002
Posts: 39
Location: Rome, Italy

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 5:22 pm    Post subject: Re: 2.6.7_rc2-love2 aka "The dead shall raise" Reply with quote

OneOfOne wrote:

i can't find the new vesafb, can someone email it to me or something?


http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/vesafb-rrc-0.1.6-2.6.x.tar.bz2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum