| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mgp-gentoo
n00b
Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 62
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:03 am Post subject: no gateway after emerge baselayout-1.11.6-r1 |
 |
|
| Gateway is not set at boot after I emerge baselayout. Before this it worked perfectly. Please ask for more info I will be glad to provide it. I haven't changed anything in /etc/conf.d/net nor has the network changed either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
befa
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 208
Location: rennes
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
first of all i'm french....  keep ti in mind for your explanation!
in order to ativate a gateway, you one thing to do on it which is
| Code: | | echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forwarding |
try that...if it doesn't work tell us if you can ping your gateway from a station,
then give your route table from your gateway and a station ...
_________________
Open Minds! Open Sources! Open Future!
think_tux@jabber.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mgp-gentoo
n00b
Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 62
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi and thanks for the fast answer. My internet seems to be working ok but the gateway gives an error on boot. The output:
| Code: |
mgp mgp # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forwarding
bash: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forwarding: No such file or directory
mgp mgp # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 255.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
mgp mgp #
|
Does seem to have the Gateway here, doesn't it? So why does it give an error on boot?
merci beaucoup
:)
Note: I do have a /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward would that be it?
| Code: |
mgp mgp # cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
0
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
befa
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 208
Location: rennes
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i think i make a mistake... try that | Code: | | echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forwardin |
or | Code: | | nano -w /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forwarding |
and you put a 1 instead of the 0!
is it the route table of your gateway?
if it is, your default gateway is wrong...you need a route to your ppp0....but i don't saw the ppp0 connexion....put on it, n make a and tell us the return...
_________________
Open Minds! Open Sources! Open Future!
think_tux@jabber.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mgp-gentoo
n00b
Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 62
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I'm not using a ppp0 connection. I'm on a lan network and 192.168.0.1 is my gateway. Output of route -n:
| Code: |
# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 255.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
#
|
Thanks again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
befa
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 208
Location: rennes
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi!
i think the problem isn't on your station, but on the gateway....
try the echo > "1" on your gateway
_________________
Open Minds! Open Sources! Open Future!
think_tux@jabber.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
UberLord
Retired Dev
Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6835
Location: Blighty
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:59 pm Post subject: Re: no gateway after emerge baselayout-1.11.6-r1 |
|
|
| mgp-gentoo wrote: | | Gateway is not set at boot after I emerge baselayout. Before this it worked perfectly. |
You should see something like this when starting your net.ethx
| Code: |
* Adding routes
* default gw 192.168.6.7 ... [ ok ]
|
How are you setting your default gateway? Post up your /etc/conf.d/net |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
befa
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 208
Location: rennes
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 3:02 pm Post subject: Re: no gateway after emerge baselayout-1.11.6-r1 |
|
|
| UberLord wrote: | | mgp-gentoo wrote: | | Gateway is not set at boot after I emerge baselayout. Before this it worked perfectly. |
You should see something like this when starting your net.ethx
| Code: |
* Adding routes
* default gw 192.168.6.7 ... [ ok ]
|
How are you setting your default gateway? Post up your /etc/conf.d/net |
i think it is, look at the route table! the last line!
default gw ---> 192.168.0.1 (his gateway)
no?
_________________
Open Minds! Open Sources! Open Future!
think_tux@jabber.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mgp-gentoo
n00b
Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 62
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I get the following:
| Code: |
* Adding routes
* default gw 192.168.0.1 ... [ !! ]
|
I don't understand why but my internet conection works fine it's just that it comes up with that error. My /etc/conf.d/net is:
| Code: |
# /etc/conf.d/net:
# $Header: /home/cvsroot/gentoo-src/rc-scripts/etc/conf.d/net,v 1.7 2002/11/18 19:39:22 azarah Exp $
# Global config file for net.* rc-scripts
# This is basically the ifconfig argument without the ifconfig $iface
#
#
#RESA
iface_eth0="192.168.0.68 broadcast 192.168.0.255 netmask 255.255.255.0"
#
#UPC
#iface_eth0="147.83.95.130 broadcast 147.83.95.255 netmask 255.255.255.0"
#
#iface_eth1="207.170.82.202 broadcast 207.0.255.255 netmask 255.255.0.0"
# For DHCP set iface_eth? to "dhcp"
# For passing options to dhcpcd use dhcpcd_eth?
#
#iface_eth0="dhcp"
#dhcpcd_eth0="..."
# For adding aliases to a interface
#
#alias_eth0="192.168.0.3 192.168.0.4"
# NB: The next is only used for aliases.
#
# To add a custom netmask/broadcast address to created aliases,
# uncomment and change accordingly. Leave commented to assign
# defaults for that interface.
#
#broadcast_eth0="192.168.0.255 192.168.0.255"
#netmask_eth0="255.255.255.0 255.255.255.0"
# For setting the default gateway
#
#gateway="eth0/192.168.0.1"
#
#UPC
#gateway="eth0/147.83.95.1"
#RESA
gateway="eth0/192.168.0.1"
|
I have not changed that ssince it worked (ie before emerging baselatout).
Should I do?
| Code: |
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
|
Note the forward not forwading as befa said or has this got nothing to do.
Thanks again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
befa
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 208
Location: rennes
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
on the station that do nothing...mine is set at 0...i was talking bout the gateway...but anyway! now it works properly! welldone!
_________________
Open Minds! Open Sources! Open Future!
think_tux@jabber.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
UberLord
Retired Dev
Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6835
Location: Blighty
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mgp-gentoo wrote: | I get the following:
| Code: |
* Adding routes
* default gw 192.168.0.1 ... [ !! ]
|
|
Your config looks fine - the error indicates there is aleady a default GW to that address in your routing table.
If you reboot do you still get the error? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mgp-gentoo
n00b
Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 62
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeap just rebooted and got the same error. I get it everytime but then internet works. How can I run the scrip again and strace it? Before baselayout all was fine. After emerging it I get the error but everything seems to work fine so why is there an error? Any log or place where I can find a description... Thanks for your time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mgp-gentoo
n00b
Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 62
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| More info. If I do /etc/init.d/net.eth0 start after stopping it it works fine. It seems to only be at boot. Ok I've just remembered I have net.eth0 run at boot level not default (rc-update) could this be the problem. Before it ran just fine at this bootlevel. I may be talking rubbish but that's because I don't really know what I'm talking about. :) Thanks again. I'll try changing it to default and see what happens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mgp-gentoo
n00b
Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 62
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, to sum up. I get an error at boot that I can only reproduce by rebooting the machine. The error does not seem to afect the connection; so it's not really an error but only the statement of the error. The bootlevel thing didn't have anything to do. So I'm back at step one except I know I have my config file well configurated. Has anybody else got this weird probem? Is this normal? Do I have to live with an error at boot? Where can I get more info about the error as the one I have now is 0? Thanks to all for hearing my ridiculous set of questions. And thanks fo the help. :)
mgp |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Duplicate Threads
