View previous topic :: View next topic |
How do you connect to the internet? |
directly |
|
4% |
[ 4 ] |
iptables w/ gentoo |
|
21% |
[ 19 ] |
iptables w/ other linux distribution |
|
9% |
[ 8 ] |
linksys or other home networking router |
|
63% |
[ 55 ] |
commercial grade cisco router or other |
|
1% |
[ 1 ] |
|
Total Votes : 87 |
|
Author |
Message |
tuxamd Apprentice
Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 281
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 1:12 am Post subject: Gentoo/Linux vs Linksys (or other home routers). |
|
|
Anyone else notice that when going from a Linksys router to a Gentoo iptables box the internet works a bit faster?
It's not that Linksys was slow, but I notice the web page responce time is a bit faster. I asked soemeone else to confirm this and they also noted the difference.
Is this difference correct and do you also notice it if you did the same? Do you think this is because of the weak embedded linux hardware of the LInksys router? I know the linksys routers run linux, but so far with my experience with 3 (2 of which had problems) they aren't very impressive. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kcy29581 Apprentice
Joined: 04 Nov 2004 Posts: 284 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
From what I gather from my experience, Linksys has some fine products. I use the WAG54G modem/router/wireless access point and I haven't noticed any performance difference compared to Windows XP Professional on the same box. I actually once benchmarked them and they both showed very similar results. Also my pcmcia nic on my laptop is a linksys PCM200, uses the tulip module and has troubles with certain distros (my laptop has a motherboard password which I don't have and only Gentoo makes it use IRQ9 which seems to make it work) but on Gentoo works a charm. _________________ There is no spoon...
Oh, and it's WINDOWS not Winblowz for those who can't spell |
|
Back to top |
|
|
troth n00b
Joined: 03 Feb 2005 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
it works even faster if I modify the routing tables (using the iptables script). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tuxamd Apprentice
Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 281
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 3:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
kcy29581 wrote: | From what I gather from my experience, Linksys has some fine products. I use the WAG54G modem/router/wireless access point and I haven't noticed any performance difference compared to Windows XP Professional on the same box. I actually once benchmarked them and they both showed very similar results. Also my pcmcia nic on my laptop is a linksys PCM200, uses the tulip module and has troubles with certain distros (my laptop has a motherboard password which I don't have and only Gentoo makes it use IRQ9 which seems to make it work) but on Gentoo works a charm. |
Huh? I don't mean how the internet works on the actual OS, I meant that web pages actually seem to load faster on a descent gentoo box with iptables used as a router regardless of which client os uses it.
troth wrote: | it works even faster if I modify the routing tables (using the iptables script). |
What do you mean? I don't understand how you can run iptables without modifying them
I'm not sure if there is some misunderstanding here but basically I'm saying that if you set up iptables on a gentoo box and use it as a router it seems to make the web page responce time a bit faster than a typical home router does it not? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
genblood Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Dec 2003 Posts: 133 Location: New Hampshire
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 4:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you have a old pentuim system hanging around you might think
about trying Smoothwall. It uses ip tables and does alot more ....
Drop by there web site and check it out at http://www.smoothwall.org . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tuxamd Apprentice
Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 281
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well that wasn't quite what I was asking, I just installed iptables and wanted to see if anyone else had noted the difference between a home router and an iptables box. Thanks for the info although I have heard and tried shorewall. Though from my understanding it's just another interface for iptables, so why not use iptables directly? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kcy29581 Apprentice
Joined: 04 Nov 2004 Posts: 284 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry that I couldn't help with my previous post... misunderstood. Can't say I've noticed any difference from what you say with iptables vs my linksys router, but that was a year ago... _________________ There is no spoon...
Oh, and it's WINDOWS not Winblowz for those who can't spell |
|
Back to top |
|
|
electrofreak l33t
Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Posts: 713 Location: Ohio, USA
|
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
yes. Routers are sorta slow. I've found that even kinda old systems (like 300Mhz or so) tend to make a better router than the dedicated router boxes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John5788 Advocate
Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Posts: 2140 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
i have a freebsd router at home _________________ John5788 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
evan18h Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 02 Dec 2004 Posts: 83
|
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I personally use a gentoo box as my router because I need to ... even though I have a linksys WRT54GS sitting right on top of it basically acting as a wired/wireless switch
here's the layout
(internet) -->(wireless AP)-->(cantenna)-->(gentoo box)-->(WRT54GS)--->(local network) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tkdfighter Apprentice
Joined: 14 May 2004 Posts: 271 Location: Bludenz, Austria
|
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My dad has a netgear router and the damn thing crashes occasionally. He won't let me set up a linux or *bsd box as a router though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Naib Watchman
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6051 Location: Removed by Neddy
|
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you cannot beat a hardware router, fast, low overhead... _________________
Quote: | Removed by Chiitoo |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
RoundsToZero Guru
Joined: 17 Nov 2003 Posts: 478 Location: New York, NY
|
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...and low power consumption. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
placeholder Advocate
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 Posts: 2500
|
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use two "home networking routers". One is Belkin and it likes to crash, and the other is a wireless Netgear which likes to work perfectly. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
georwell Guru
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 430 Location: Uppsala, Sweden
|
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | ...and low power consumption. |
2nd to this one. Computers can suck up a lot a of juice and really raise the ole power bill. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
QV n00b
Joined: 13 Feb 2004 Posts: 54
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Right now, I use a D-Link DI-604 router.
I can't stand Linksys...I've dealt with some Linksys horror stories...my parents bought one when they went to Cable), and it would die all the time and not be usable for hours. Before they bought it, I told them to buy D-Link, but they didn't listen--eventually, when they got sick of their crappy router crapping out, they got a D-Link.
However, I've been toying with the idea of building a mini-ITX routerbox, running Gentoo, of course. The main reasons why I'm using my D-Link is because I like its size and cost. A mini-ITX would be closest in size, but not quite (my D-Link is bloody tiny), and while a mini-ITX system wouldn't cost too much (I've priced it at $255 for a VIA C3-based barebones + whatever else I need to get it running), it's still far more expensive than my $20 D-Link. It's still something that would be fun to do for the hell of it, so I may very well go ahead with it anyway... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PowerFactor Veteran
Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Posts: 1693 Location: out of it
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
My Linksys is a linux iptables box. A nice silent, small one with low power consumption too.
I've only had it for a few weeks but no problems so far. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seank l33t
Joined: 08 Jul 2004 Posts: 686
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Smoothwall. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tuxamd Apprentice
Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 281
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well the only negative thing about having a "real" linux router is the size. I don't think power consumption really matters. At the price of electricity and gasoline there are tons of things we do that don't even come close to what a small weak computer uses. Linksys or not linksys I don't like little home embedded linux routers because like people have said and like I experienced they crash quite often. However they are small, consume less power, and also are a bit easier to set up. Glad to hear the feedback, though some people haven't expressed tehmselves clearly as in which type of router they really use
Edit:
Cool, also is smoothwall basically just a simplified interface for iptables? Or what are some of your benefits of using it over the raw iptables configuration? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seank l33t
Joined: 08 Jul 2004 Posts: 686
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Smoothwall is a minimal Linux distro designed specifically for being a router/firewall which makes it quite easy to setup and use. The installer is very simple and straightforward as is the web interface (which is basically just nice interface for the common tasks a sysadmin must do for a router/firewall -- much like linksys' web interfaces, but smoothwall's is better and has more features in it) Give it a try on an old junker box. http://www.smoothwall.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lamaistres Apprentice
Joined: 17 Dec 2002 Posts: 268 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use a Lynksys router. At the time, the linksys cost only $20 used. The cost for memory and other pieces of hardware (used) I needed was far more expensive, something like $50. My plan was to use freesco on a P1. Nowadays, hardware isn't a problem because everyone's giving it away. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
truekaiser l33t
Joined: 05 Mar 2004 Posts: 801
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
tkdfighter wrote: | My dad has a netgear router and the damn thing crashes occasionally. He won't let me set up a linux or *bsd box as a router though. |
i have a netgear one and it's very poorly made. it reset alot. i found out that the pos case it was in was the problem the thing was literally killing it's self with the amount of heat it puts out. i had to remove it from it's case, make a makeshift holder for it out of legos and attach chip set heat sinks to get it to be stable. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
emes Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 87
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
My gentoo computer is a router, access point and desktop all in one |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tuxamd Apprentice
Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 281
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
emes wrote: | My gentoo computer is a router, access point and desktop all in one |
Very nice By that you mean wifi? How do you make a linux box a wifi access point? Just curious because I don't know much about wifi and linux yet.
Yeah my friend had a netgear also and it kept crashing all the time. So did my Linksys, they felt a bit warm but I bet the actual chips inside were way overheated. The cooling they put on those is horrible, it's just a bunch of poked holes just like a child would make on a can with bugs in it. I head the new gigabit home switches they have are very loud from a tiny fan. They need to take learning examples from cooling hardware manufacturers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|