Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
2.6.6_rc1-love1 aka "The Night Stalker"
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
steel300
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 11:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master_Of_Disaster wrote:
done


Got it, thanks.
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Superman53142
n00b
n00b


Joined: 24 Mar 2003
Posts: 54

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 1:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Code:
  CC      drivers/net/8139too.o
drivers/net/8139too.c:823:91: warning: null character(s) ignored
drivers/net/8139too.c: In function `rtl8139_init_board':
drivers/net/8139too.c:812: error: syntax error at end of input
drivers/net/8139too.c:776: warning: unused variable `version'
drivers/net/8139too.c:773: warning: unused variable `i'
drivers/net/8139too.c:771: warning: unused variable `tmp8'
drivers/net/8139too.c:768: warning: unused variable `ioaddr'
drivers/net/8139too.c:160: warning: `media' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:161: warning: `full_duplex' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:165: warning: `multicast_filter_limit' defined but not
d
drivers/net/8139too.c:168: warning: `debug' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:230: warning: `board_info' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:236: warning: `rtl8139_pci_tbl' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:279: warning: `ethtool_stats_keys' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:605: warning: `read_eeprom' declared `static' but never
fined
drivers/net/8139too.c:606: warning: `rtl8139_open' declared `static' but neve
efined
drivers/net/8139too.c:607: warning: `mdio_read' declared `static' but never d
ned
drivers/net/8139too.c:609: warning: `mdio_write' declared `static' but never
ined
drivers/net/8139too.c:610: warning: `rtl8139_start_thread' declared `static'
 never defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:611: warning: `rtl8139_tx_timeout' declared `static' bu
ever defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:612: warning: `rtl8139_init_ring' declared `static' but
ver defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:614: warning: `rtl8139_start_xmit' declared `static' bu
ever defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:615: warning: `rtl8139_poll' declared `static' but neve
efined
drivers/net/8139too.c:620: warning: `rtl8139_interrupt' declared `static' but
ver defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:621: warning: `rtl8139_close' declared `static' but nev
defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:622: warning: `netdev_ioctl' declared `static' but neve
efined
drivers/net/8139too.c:623: warning: `rtl8139_get_stats' declared `static' but
ver defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:624: warning: `rtl8139_set_rx_mode' declared `static' b
never defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:625: warning: `__set_rx_mode' declared `static' but nev
defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:626: warning: `rtl8139_hw_start' declared `static' but
er defined
drivers/net/8139too.c:627: warning: `rtl8139_ethtool_ops' defined but not use
drivers/net/8139too.c:723: warning: `__rtl8139_cleanup_dev' defined but not u
drivers/net/8139too.c:749: warning: `rtl8139_chip_reset' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:767: warning: `rtl8139_init_board' defined but not used
drivers/net/8139too.c:814:1: unterminated #ifdef
make[2]: *** [drivers/net/8139too.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2


My NIC is broken :(
_________________
'I belong to the "Great-God Party", and will have nothing to do with the "Little-God Party." Christ does not want nibblers of the possible, but grabbers of the impossible.'
~C. T. Studd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steel300
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 1:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

@superman

Good god, what did you do? That looks like a bad driver in mm. I know I didn't touch that one. Could you try using the latest mm and see if the problem still occurs?
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sdaffis
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 99

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 5:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
They aren't included anymore. I was under the impression that they weren't needed anymore. If you still have problems, try and upgrade your BIOS, taht should take care of everything.


I'm not really a friend of bios updates... Could you post a link to the patches so I can apply them automatically in the future? :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Martigen
n00b
n00b


Joined: 04 Mar 2003
Posts: 59

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 6:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

steel300 wrote:
hinken wrote:
just wondering, is the nforce-apic-patches included in this kernel?

Good job Steel, love your style!


They aren't included anymore. I was under the impression that they weren't needed anymore. If you still have problems, try and upgrade your BIOS, taht should take care of everything.


They are still needed, even with latest BIOSes, as my machine can attest. They're very handy patches to have -- if you can run your machine 10 degrees cooler, why wouldn't you?

I'm a revent love-convert and have had to manually patch all previous kernels. Would be great if love included them by default!

Keep up the good work.

Mart
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stahlsau
Guru
Guru


Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 565
Location: WildWestwoods

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 6:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
They aren't included anymore. I was under the impression that they weren't needed anymore. If you still have problems, try and upgrade your BIOS, taht should take care of everything.

sry, but the bios-update doesn't take care of this issue, at least not on my box. I can tell you by the hardlocks when you took out the patches ;-)
ATM, i'm running a patched dev-kernel with nvidia-apic and reiser4, and 'cause i changed my drives to reiser4, i'm not able to run love-sources :-(
But later, when you include reiser4, i'd LOVE to see those nvidia-patches included ;-)
_________________
Join the adopt an unanswered post initiative today
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PrakashP
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 1246
Location: C.C.A.A., Germania

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 7:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I already said it a few time and I say it again: Those patches are not the right ones. Take a llok into the german forum under the topic "kernel ohne apic". There I posted some more intelligent patches.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Regor
Guru
Guru


Joined: 06 Aug 2002
Posts: 545
Location: 39° 2' 48" N, 120° 59' 2" W

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 7:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

steel300 wrote:
nepenthe wrote:
I'm getting this error now...
Code:
#
  SPLIT   include/linux/autoconf.h -> include/config/*
make[1]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
  CHK     include/linux/compile.h
  CC      arch/i386/mm/init.o
  CC      arch/i386/mm/pgtable.o
arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c: In function `show_mem':
arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c:27: warning: unused variable `badram'
  LD      arch/i386/mm/built-in.o
  CC      kernel/kmod.o
kernel/kmod.c: In function `call_usermodehelper':
kernel/kmod.c:253: error: `khelper_wq' undeclared (first use in this function)
kernel/kmod.c:253: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
kernel/kmod.c:253: error: for each function it appears in.)
kernel/kmod.c: In function `usermodehelper_init':
kernel/kmod.c:267: error: `khelper_wq' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[1]: *** [kernel/kmod.o] Error 1
make: *** [kernel] Error 2

hmm... =)



Try this patch: http://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2004/4/19/41/1


I had the same error as nepenthe. That patch did the trick. Thanks! :)
_________________
Sometimes the appropriate response to reality is to go insane.
-Philip K. Dick, Valis
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sawanv
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 238

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Any chance of getting this in love sources:

http://shfs.sourceforge.net/index.html

Looks really useful.....

Keep up the good work steel300.
_________________
Eir kahen "chalo ghar jayen",
Bir kahen "chalo ghar jayen",
Phatte kahen "chalo ghar jayen",
Cartman kahen....."Screw you guys, I am going home !!! "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justin sane
n00b
n00b


Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 31

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sawanv wrote:
http://shfs.sourceforge.net/index.html


Is there any good reason why you wouldn't use LUFS for that? Maybe it's a little faster, but for a network connected filesystem (especially over the internet.. even with broadband) I don't see the advantage over a LUFS solution.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jimbojetset
n00b
n00b


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 67
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 9:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

All working nicely here - ati binary drivers compiled and working well although error filling dmesg:
Code:

led
[fglrx:firegl_agp_lock_pages] *ERROR* agp_allocate_memory_phys_list failed
[fglrx:firegl_agp_lock_pages] *ERROR* agp_allocate_memory_phys_list failed
[fglrx:firegl_agp_lock_pages] *ERROR* agp_allocate_memory_phys_list failed
[fglrx:firegl_agp_lock_pages] *ERROR* agp_allocate_memory_phys_list failed

etc....


Everything seems to be working properly so obviously nothing critical

James
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fallow
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2206
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bootsplash doesn`t work also .

i can`t live without bootsplash ;)

greetzz
_________________
"Time is a companion that goes with us on a journey. It reminds us to cherish each moment, because it will never come again. What we leave behind is not as important as how we have lived" J-L. Picard ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steel300
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

justin sane wrote:
sawanv wrote:
http://shfs.sourceforge.net/index.html


Is there any good reason why you wouldn't use LUFS for that? Maybe it's a little faster, but for a network connected filesystem (especially over the internet.. even with broadband) I don't see the advantage over a LUFS solution.


Lufs supports lots of different protocols instead of just ssh. I'd prefer lufs over this solution, since it's more of an "all in one" type dealie. Not a bad idea though.
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sdaffis
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 99

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 12:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I already said it a few time and I say it again: Those patches are not the right ones. Take a llok into the german forum under the topic "kernel ohne apic". There I posted some more intelligent patches.


When I try to apply your patches I simply get this:
Code:
linux-2.6.6-rc1-love1 # patch -p1 < /home/jonas/nforce2-apic.patch2 patching file arch/i386/kernel/apic.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1065 with fuzz 2 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1090.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1203 with fuzz 2 (offset -5 lines).
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/i386/kernel/apic.c.rej

and this:
Code:
linux-2.6.6-rc1-love1 # patch -p1 < /home/jonas/nforce2-acpi.patch2 patching file Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
Hunk #1 FAILED at 122.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt.rej
patching file arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 636 with fuzz 2 (offset 22 lines).
patching file arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
Hunk #2 FAILED at 327.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c.rej
patching file Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
Hunk #1 FAILED at 122.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt.rej
patching file arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 642 with fuzz 2 (offset 28 lines).
patching file arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 328.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c.rej


Please note that it didn't make any difference in answering yes or no to "Assume -R?" :(
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
snekiepete
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 May 2003
Posts: 306
Location: WISCONSIN

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 2:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SMP has been broken since 2.6.5-love5

Any reason why this may possibly be?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steel300
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 2:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

snekiepete wrote:
SMP has been broken since 2.6.5-love5

Any reason why this may possibly be?


What? I'm using SMP right now. What leads you to believe that SMP is broken?
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
polle
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 1498
Location: Belgium

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

works fine , except for bootsplash like mentioned before
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
snekiepete
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 May 2003
Posts: 306
Location: WISCONSIN

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have not been able to get either kernels to boot with SMP support enabled. I am trying the mm-sources to see if I get the same result. The bootup just spits out some jibberish and freezes requiring a hard reboot.......

They do boot with SMP unselected, and I am running an HT processor, not an actual 2 cpu system, so i did try to also have SMT support enabled and disabled, neither made any difference
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steel300
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

snekiepete wrote:
I have not been able to get either kernels to boot with SMP support enabled. I am trying the mm-sources to see if I get the same result. The bootup just spits out some jibberish and freezes requiring a hard reboot.......

They do boot with SMP unselected, and I am running an HT processor, not an actual 2 cpu system, so i did try to also have SMT support enabled and disabled, neither made any difference


Hmm, odd, it shouldn't do that. I'm guseeing it ahs something to do with apic or acpi. Did you enable acpi? Could you pass pci=coacpi on the kernel line and see if it boots then?
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
snekiepete
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 May 2003
Posts: 306
Location: WISCONSIN

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll give that a shot, I have the same problem with 2.6.6-rc1-mm1
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
snekiepete
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 May 2003
Posts: 306
Location: WISCONSIN

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I got a little further with pci=noacpi, here is the error message

Kernel panic: Fatal exception in interrupt

then it lists some cpu registers, ie ebx, ecx, edx, ds and so on. But is frozen to the world......
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steel300
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

snekiepete wrote:
Well, I got a little further with pci=noacpi, here is the error message

Kernel panic: Fatal exception in interrupt

then it lists some cpu registers, ie ebx, ecx, edx, ds and so on. But is frozen to the world......


Was this on mm or love or both? What are your system specs?
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
snekiepete
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 May 2003
Posts: 306
Location: WISCONSIN

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

exactly the same on both, I am running a 2.8 p4, on an intel d865perl mobo at 800mhz. Both kernels will start with SMP disabled, and this started with 2.6.5-love5 ( I did not try the mm-sources with that kernel, but I suppose the outcome to be similiar). I am not sure what other specs would be handy, let me know.... Thanks Steel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steel300
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 1155

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

snekiepete wrote:
exactly the same on both, I am running a 2.8 p4, on an intel d865perl mobo at 800mhz. Both kernels will start with SMP disabled, and this started with 2.6.5-love5 ( I did not try the mm-sources with that kernel, but I suppose the outcome to be similiar). I am not sure what other specs would be handy, let me know.... Thanks Steel


hmm, could you try backing out this patch and tell me how it goes:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.5/2.6.5-mm6/broken-out/sched-wake_up-speedup.patch
_________________
Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
joki
n00b
n00b


Joined: 30 Sep 2003
Posts: 53
Location: germany

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

Linux jokiGentoo 2.6.6-rc1-love1 #2 Tue Apr 20 13:47:44 GMT 2004 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux


it runs like a charm!!
this time without preemption, and it feels better like any kernel before!
_________________
emerge dev-pocket/money
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum