View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mlybarger Guru


Joined: 04 Sep 2002 Posts: 480
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2002 12:09 pm Post subject: upgrade to X 4.2.1 |
|
|
i'm wanting to upgrade to X 4.2.1, i'm hoping it has better support for my video card (Radeon 7000), this might be in the mask file, but how does one unmask a package in there? some lines have > signs, some have = signs, some have # signs.?
also, does anyone know if moving to x 4.2.1 will recompile anything that was built on x? kde, etc? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mpemba Effect Apprentice


Joined: 18 Sep 2002 Posts: 156
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2002 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The '#' are comments as you know, and as a wild guess '=' are mask anything that = and '>=' is = and = greater than.
To unmask xfree 4.2.1 you'll just need to remove the = before x11=base/xfree-4.2.1
When you emerge youd should see 4.2.1  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aardvark Guru


Joined: 30 Jun 2002 Posts: 576
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2002 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mpemba Effect wrote: | The '#' are comments as you know, and as a wild guess '=' are mask anything that = and '>=' is = and = greater than.
To unmask xfree 4.2.1 you'll just need to remove the = before x11=base/xfree-4.2.1
When you emerge youd should see 4.2.1  |
I would just put '#' in front of the xree line... to "comment it out" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fmalabre Guru


Joined: 19 Jun 2002 Posts: 376 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2002 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To unmask a package, add '#' in front of the line containing the ebuild name.
This has been discussed already as you could see doing a search. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Craigo Apprentice


Joined: 09 Aug 2002 Posts: 249 Location: /dev/life
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2002 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I presume we are seeing X4.2.1 to be released in gentoo soon?
-/Craigo/- |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ebrostig Bodhisattva


Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 3152 Location: Orlando, Fl
|
Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2002 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Craigo wrote: | I presume we are seeing X4.2.1 to be released in gentoo soon?
-/Craigo/- |
I would not recommend that you upgrade to 4.2.1 if you have any form of ATI card as the drivers are broken in 4.2.1 as I found out the hard way
Erik |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dizzy n00b

Joined: 04 Aug 2002 Posts: 50 Location: Melb.OZ.Terra.Sol
|
Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2002 2:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the flip side, I have an ATI card (radeon mobile) and running 4.2.1 fine. YMMV however. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pitr Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 23 Jun 2002 Posts: 90
|
Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2002 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Xfree86 4.2.1 runs like a champ on my machine and I have a Radeon 7500, using the daily snapshots from DRI. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
silverter Guru


Joined: 10 Apr 2002 Posts: 491 Location: Ulm, DE
|
Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2002 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I also have a ATI Rage 3D Pro LT on my notebook and running X4.2.1 without a problem. Still missing DRI for this card, but I don't think I'll get DRI running on this one, ever
regards, _________________ -- A Guru was once a Beginner -- |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fmalabre Guru


Joined: 19 Jun 2002 Posts: 376 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2002 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
According to the release note, there is nothing new for video dirver (just a revert for some ATI values).
Does anybody get 3D support through DRI for the Radeon 8500 on this version? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mlybarger Guru


Joined: 04 Sep 2002 Posts: 480
|
Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2002 12:37 pm Post subject: damn ati cards |
|
|
i haven't upgraded x just yet, but did re-build a kernel, the radeon stuff is now compiled as a module in the kernel. glxinfo says i've got dri, but glxgears give at most 120fps, and it's choppy at best. i'm running 1024x768 in 16bit color. again, my card is a radeon 7000 (ve?). i would expect a little better than this with glxgears. does anyone know if ati-gatos is reqired to get this card working? it was masked in the current portage tree.
someone else mentioned dri snapshots, wouldn't a newer version of x have latest dri modules? where can i get the dri dailies to try out?
thanks!
jonesin' for some tuxracer.... (shoulda stayed with the rage128 or gotten an nvidia card) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pilla Bodhisattva


Joined: 07 Aug 2002 Posts: 7732 Location: Underworld
|
Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2002 12:58 pm Post subject: Re: damn ati cards |
|
|
Don't you have to emerge and run opengl-update?
mark_lybarger wrote: | i haven't upgraded x just yet, but did re-build a kernel, the radeon stuff is now compiled as a module in the kernel. glxinfo says i've got dri, but glxgears give at most 120fps, and it's choppy at best. i'm running 1024x768 in 16bit color. again, my card is a radeon 7000 (ve?). i would expect a little better than this with glxgears. does anyone know if ati-gatos is reqired to get this card working? it was masked in the current portage tree.
someone else mentioned dri snapshots, wouldn't a newer version of x have latest dri modules? where can i get the dri dailies to try out?
thanks!
jonesin' for some tuxracer.... (shoulda stayed with the rage128 or gotten an nvidia card) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pitr Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 23 Jun 2002 Posts: 90
|
Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2002 1:05 pm Post subject: Re: damn ati cards |
|
|
mark_lybarger wrote: | i haven't upgraded x just yet, but did re-build a kernel, the radeon stuff is now compiled as a module in the kernel. glxinfo says i've got dri, but glxgears give at most 120fps, and it's choppy at best. i'm running 1024x768 in 16bit color. again, my card is a radeon 7000 (ve?). i would expect a little better than this with glxgears. does anyone know if ati-gatos is reqired to get this card working? it was masked in the current portage tree.
someone else mentioned dri snapshots, wouldn't a newer version of x have latest dri modules? where can i get the dri dailies to try out?
thanks!
jonesin' for some tuxracer.... (shoulda stayed with the rage128 or gotten an nvidia card) |
http://dri.sourceforge.net/
Remember to install the drivers when X isn't running or bad things(tm) might happen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mlybarger Guru


Joined: 04 Sep 2002 Posts: 480
|
Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2002 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i do have opengl-update installed, still horrible framerates. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pilla Bodhisattva


Joined: 07 Aug 2002 Posts: 7732 Location: Underworld
|
Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2002 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
did you run it after installing your new XFree?
mark_lybarger wrote: | i do have opengl-update installed, still horrible framerates. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
i_hate_your_os Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 29 Aug 2002 Posts: 128 Location: Manhattan Beach, CA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2002 8:52 am Post subject: wierd, all works great for me. |
|
|
I have a radeon "64M VIVO" (its a 7200 under the hood iirc) and seem to have had DRI working fine both in 4.2.0 and, for a while (I reverted) 4.2.1:
Code: |
server glx extensions:
GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context
client glx vendor string: SGI
client glx version string: 1.2
client glx extensions:
GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context
GLX extensions:
GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context
OpenGL vendor string: VA Linux Systems, Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Radeon 20010402 AGP 2x x86/MMX/3DNow!
OpenGL version string: 1.2 Mesa 3.4.2
OpenGL extensions:
GL_ARB_multitexture, GL_ARB_transpose_matrix, GL_EXT_abgr,
GL_EXT_blend_func_separate, GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint,
GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array, GL_EXT_histogram, GL_EXT_packed_pixels,
GL_EXT_polygon_offset, GL_EXT_rescale_normal, GL_EXT_stencil_wrap,
GL_EXT_texture3D, GL_EXT_texture_env_add, GL_EXT_texture_env_combine,
GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3, GL_EXT_texture_object, GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias,
GL_EXT_vertex_array, GL_MESA_window_pos, GL_MESA_resize_buffers,
GL_NV_texgen_reflection, GL_PGI_misc_hints, GL_SGIS_pixel_texture,
GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp
glu version: 1.3
glu extensions:
GLU_EXT_nurbs_tessellator, GLU_EXT_object_space_tess
|
here's some snippets from my XF86Config-4:
Code: |
.
.
.
Section "Module"
Load "extmod"
Load "xie"
Load "xaa"
Load "pex5"
Load "dri"
Load "dbe"
Load "record"
Load "xtrap"
Load "glx"
Load "speedo"
Load "type1"
Load "freetype"
EndSection
.
.
.
Section "Device"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "ati"
VendorName "ATI"
BoardName "Radeon QD"
BusID "PCI:1:5:0"
Option "AGPMode" "2"
Option "AGPSize" "64"
EndSection
.
.
.
|
I used to have some crashes on exit/reset of kdm; lately its been good...
btw, I use gcc3.2, kde3.0, and portage 1.4... _________________ -IHYOS
"All laws which are repugnant to the constitution are null and void."
-Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zen_guerrilla Guru


Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Posts: 343 Location: Greece
|
Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2002 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm running 4.2.1 for 1 week, without a hitch, on nvidia gf2mx, however yesterday on my usual 'emerge rsync' I noticed the following files on /usr/portage/x11-base/xfree/files/4.2.1-patches/ :
Code: | 002_all_4.2.0-ati-r128-vtswitch-fix-busmaster-enable.patch.bz2
003_all_4.2.0-ati-radeon-mobility-FireGL-7800.patch.bz2
004_all_4.2.0-ati-radeon-vtswitch-fix-busmaster-enable.patch.bz2 |
So I guess emerging 4.2.1 now, should apply them and maybe fix problems with ATI cards. If an ebuild is masked it is for a reason & and that reason maybe development
.:: zen ::. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Craigo Apprentice


Joined: 09 Aug 2002 Posts: 249 Location: /dev/life
|
Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2002 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Seeing you peeps are already running it, I think I give it a go sometimes next week (I've just reinstalled!)
-/Craigo/- |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DooBeDooBeDo Apprentice


Joined: 21 Aug 2002 Posts: 220 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
silverter wrote: | I also have a ATI Rage 3D Pro LT on my notebook and running X4.2.1 without a problem. Still missing DRI for this card, but I don't think I'll get DRI running on this one, ever
|
Have you tried utah-glx? they're hosted on sourceforge and an alternative to DRI for older non-DRI supported cards. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Swishy Guru


Joined: 06 Jun 2002 Posts: 491 Location: NZ
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2002 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have just found the Matrox drivers (from Matrox) wont install against 4.2.1
I downloaded the Source but it appears to be lacking nice things like config etc scripts .... anyone got these drivers compiled from source ?????
Cheers
Dale. _________________ Theres no substitute for C.I. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bedidos n00b

Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2002 4:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am having the same problems with the low frames rates. I too am getting about 120fps, although with a radeon 8500. I use the dri.sourceforge.net r200 driver. I've tried changing every setting, and nothing seems to help. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bedidos n00b

Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2002 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am having the same problems with the low frames rates. I too am getting about 120fps, although with a radeon 8500. I use the dri.sourceforge.net r200 driver. I've tried changing every setting, and nothing seems to help. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|