View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pablored Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 01 May 2002 Posts: 96
|
Posted: Fri May 24, 2002 11:23 am Post subject: Gnome2 people? |
|
|
I was wondering how many gents are running the new gnome2 betas, and what was their method of install.
With an 'emerge rsync' today, spider's gnome2 ebuilds have appeared in my portage tree (currently masked).
I have tried the garnome scripts as well as the ebuilds, and have met a few problems.
I'd like to hear some success stories and see some screenshots. Is it just me or do the k's always seem a little thin when AA'ed? kde related? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spider Retired Dev
Joined: 26 May 2002 Posts: 163 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sun May 26, 2002 9:24 pm Post subject: emerge :) |
|
|
I use.... * drumroll * ...
: )
you are... sooo .. surprised, I can hear the "ohh..." _________________ For immediate answers, @gentoo.org :
gentoo-users, gentoo-desktop, gentoo-dev, spider |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Manny Calavera n00b
Joined: 21 May 2002 Posts: 68 Location: Germany / near Munich
|
Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
g2 is great work...just too few progs ported
see you,
- Manny - _________________ Viva la revolución! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scandium Retired Dev
Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 340 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Although I think QT is a better framework (*flame flame*) I prefer Gnome2 for some reason...In fact, I like everything, there is nothing I don't like
I think There will be much more Gnome people when 2.0 got final because many don't want to install a beta and many don't want to have hard work (those who don't know about garnome for example).
But let's see...I have been trying Beta3 (worked well except the panel crashed every ~30 seconds ) and I am currently compiling garnome 0.10.1... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just finished emerging gnome2 a couple hours ago. First impressions: This is definitely cooler then gnome1.4 and even though I dont really like the gtk+ toolkit (as compared to qt), i think overall it looks pretty good (themes at http://www.sunshineinabag.co.uk ).
What impressed me more is that it compiled with gcc 3.1 (-march=athlon -O2 -g -pipe) and seems semi-stable (the panel sometimes crashes, but reloads instantaneously). Metacity works and more importantly, AA is on (admittedly not as good as in kde, but works).
Next stop: try to find out the state galeon2 is in and try to compile it |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lx Veteran
Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 1012 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed May 29, 2002 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Galeon2 state ain't that good , well mozilla gtk2 state ain't that good, tried cvs and you have to patch and disable gtk, resulting in no plugins, well you're using gcc 3.1 so maybe that ain't a problem, I'm now trying to compile mozilla with gcc 2.95.3 just to get the freakin java and flash plugins to work, aaarrrgggh , I hope those plugin guys would recompile their plugins with gcc 3.x. Going to try it again in a little while, now using mozilla-cvs, missing galeon .
Cya lX _________________ "Remember there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over.", Frank Zappa |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|