But now it's being obtuse:
and from the git repo README:man sddm.conf wrote:MinimumVT=
Minimum virtual terminal number that will be used by the first display. Virtual terminal num‐
ber will increase as new displays added. This setting is no longer available since SDDM
v0.20.
Obviously "sorting out an ebuild" to specify a different SDDM_INITIAL_VT is childsplay in Gentoo, so I did it, but it doesn't work.github.com/sddm/sddm wrote:VIRTUAL TERMINALS
SDDM is assumed to start at the tty specified by the cmake variable SDDM_INITIAL_VT which is an integer and defaults to 1.
If SDDM_INITIAL_VT wasn't available, SDDM will use the next available one instead.
You can override SDDM_INITIAL_VT if you want to have a different one if, for example, you were planning on using tty1 for something else.
Reading the open issues leads me to believe that the sddm devs are more interested in jumping through hoops designed for intellectual gymnastics so that asking your greeter to open on a defined VT is less than "a valid use case", rather than fixing the actual issue of not being able to specify a VT on which SDDM should open. and as such we are entering #NotABug territory.
I'm not into playing games with the disingenuous (this is not up for debate, leave me the fsck alone), can anyone recommend a non-ugly greeter with a sensible depgraph before I mask and archive above the (soon to exist) ::local copy of the 0.19.0 sddm ebuild?

