Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
XFS LVM with size smaller then PV size
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
meitnerium
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 77

PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 4:51 pm    Post subject: XFS LVM with size smaller then PV size Reply with quote

I have a gentoo installed after CentOS installation. CentOS used LVM and XFS, and I'm not used to this configuration. I resized the disk to install gentoo and thinking about using the centOS home repertory on my gentoo installation. However, I am now unable to access the LVM partition. When I look at my LVM parition using lvs comand, I got this output :
Code:

# lvs
  WARNING: Device /dev/sda2 has size of 3708838301 sectors which is smaller than corresponding PV size of 3904929792 sectors. Was device resized?
  WARNING: One or more devices used as PVs in VG cl have changed sizes.
  LV   VG Attr       LSize   Pool Origin Data%  Meta%  Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert
  home cl -wi-a-----   1.51t
  root cl -wi------- 106.13g
  swap cl -wi-a-----  <5.88g

I resized my /dev/cl/home partition, but it look like it's not enough. I have now free space, but the PV size is the same. Does someone can explain me how to resize the PV? I can delete the root and swap partition.

Thank you for your help ! :)
_________________
Voici la solution : http://www.perdu.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
grknight
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Posts: 1659

PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Read about the pvresize command and then execute it.

Be sure to have a backup if it contains anything valuable and try the --test option first.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Posts: 54234
Location: 56N 3W

PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 5:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

meitnerium,

A LVM Physical Volume is a block device donated to LVM.
The next layer up is the Volume Group that comprises one or more physical volumes.
All this is hidden by creating Logical Volumes inside the Volume group.
Such Logical Volumes can be split over several physical volumes.

Physical Volumes are often named after the the block device that holds them. In your case, /dev/sda2, but they are not partitions.
Horrible things can happen when the block device is resized.
The physical volume still things it owns the original space it was allocated. The 'lost space' may still hold filesystem data.

The correct approach is to resize (reduce) the sizes of the layers from the top down to ensure that there is no data in the area of the PV to be reclaimed.
Conversely, when adding space, do it from the bottom up.

What to do about it.

If you wrote into the reclaimed space, then something in likely to be damaged.
If not, undoing the resize, should fix it because no data will have been harmed.

pvresize will change the size of the PV. Seen
Code:
man pvresize

Code:
# pvdisplay -m
  --- Physical volume ---
  PV Name               /dev/md127
  VG Name               storage
  PV Size               21.83 TiB / not usable 3.00 MiB
  Allocatable           yes
  PE Size               4.00 MiB
  Total PE              5722928
  Free PE               2242708
  Allocated PE          3480220
  PV UUID               9BMmYq-Kb8q-PhM1-fv1B-SLgj-80OI-7WlAzt
   
  --- Physical Segments ---
  Physical extent 0 to 524287:
    Logical volume   /dev/storage/home
    Logical extents   0 to 524287
  Physical extent 524288 to 652287:
    Logical volume   /dev/storage/distfiles
    Logical extents   0 to 127999
  Physical extent 652288 to 683007:
    Logical volume   /dev/storage/packages
    Logical extents   0 to 30719
  Physical extent 683008 to 2925714:
    FREE
  Physical extent 2925715 to 5722926:
    Logical volume   /dev/storage/media
    Logical extents   0 to 2797211
  Physical extent 5722927 to 5722927:
    FREE
   
  --- Physical volume ---
  PV Name               /dev/nvme0n1p3
  VG Name               nvmestatic
  PV Size               931.33 GiB / not usable 1.69 MiB
  Allocatable           yes
  PE Size               4.00 MiB
  Total PE              238421
  Free PE               157781
  Allocated PE          80640
  PV UUID               HLkqt3-b2jB-mce2-urgD-8s0n-WTIh-4AkfyA
   
  --- Physical Segments ---
  Physical extent 0 to 511:
    Logical volume   /dev/nvmestatic/root
    Logical extents   0 to 511
  Physical extent 512 to 77311:
    Logical volume   /dev/nvmestatic/usr
    Logical extents   0 to 76799
  Physical extent 77312 to 78847:
    Logical volume   /dev/nvmestatic/var
    Logical extents   0 to 1535
  Physical extent 78848 to 79615:
    Logical volume   /dev/nvmestatic/opt
    Logical extents   0 to 767
  Physical extent 79616 to 79871:
    Logical volume   /dev/nvmestatic/local
    Logical extents   0 to 255
  Physical extent 79872 to 80639:
    Logical volume   /dev/nvmestatic/portage
    Logical extents   0 to 767
  Physical extent 80640 to 238420:
    FREE


Note that free space need not be at the end of the PV
My
Code:
   PV Name               /dev/md127
  VG Name               storage
has its free space in the middle.

We need to establish exactly what you did, then undo it as long as you did not make any writes to the potentially doubly allocated space.
If you did make writes, how are your backups?

Your
Code:
# pvdisplay -m
will be good so see. as it will show where the free space in the Physical Volume is.
_________________
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hu
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 21624

PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I read this post, the PV may already be broken. I think OP shrank the containing partition (sda2) first, while the PV inside it, and the LVs inside that, and the filesystems inside those, still had their larger sizes. OP then proceeded to give the space reclaimed from sda2 to some other purpose, and probably overwrote it. If so, that would allow whatever sectors that are now outside sda2's smaller size to be overwritten, even if they had valuable data in them. Shrinking the PV may get rid of the warning, but I recommend validating the data inside the relevant LVs as soon as possible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
meitnerium
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 77

PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you for your help. I was able to delete the root and the swap :

Code:

# lvremove  /dev/cl/root
  WARNING: Device /dev/sda2 has size of 3708838301 sectors which is smaller than corresponding PV size of 3904929792 sectors. Was device resized?
  WARNING: One or more devices used as PVs in VG cl have changed sizes.
  Logical volume "root" successfully removed.

So now I must just have the home at the start of the partition.
Code:

# pvdisplay -m
  --- Physical volume ---
  PV Name               /dev/sda2
  VG Name               cl
  PV Size               1.66 TiB / not usable 3.00 MiB
  Allocatable           yes
  PE Size               4.00 MiB
  Total PE              435199
  Free PE               38399
  Allocated PE          396800
  PV UUID               lKkyPj-Ieaj-n9IJ-ixqs-iPFQ-JRFW-IpONch

  --- Physical Segments ---
  Physical extent 0 to 1503:
    FREE
  Physical extent 1504 to 398303:
    Logical volume      /dev/cl/home
    Logical extents     0 to 396799
  Physical extent 398304 to 435198:
    FREE

And I am now able to resize using pvresize.
Code:

pvresize --setphysicalvolumesize 1700G /dev/sda2
/dev/sda2: Requested size 1.66 TiB is less than real size <1.73 TiB. Proceed?  [y/n]: y
  WARNING: /dev/sda2: Pretending size is 3565158400 not 3708838301 sectors.
  Physical volume "/dev/sda2" changed
  1 physical volume(s) resized or updated / 0 physical volume(s) not resized

However, The mount is still not woriking :
Code:

mount /dev/cl/home /mnt/oldhome/
mount: /mnt/oldhome: can't read superblock on /dev/mapper/cl-home.

_________________
Voici la solution : http://www.perdu.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Posts: 54234
Location: 56N 3W

PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

meitnerium,

What did you do with the doubly allocated space after you shrank partition sda2 while it was still holding the original size PV named sda2.
The former is a partition, the latter is a LVM physical volume. They are different block devices.

Its quite possible that any write operations damaged the filesystem in /dev/cl/home
_________________
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
meitnerium
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 77

PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The sda2 partition have been shranked and a sda3 partition created. The partition have been formated as ext4 and gentoo installed on this partition. I have this message using dmesg:

Quote:

XFS (dm-1): last sector read failed


Yes, maybe I was wrong doing that. I didn't thinked about the LVM ... However, I am able to read file name using xfs_info /dev/cl/home.

Currently, I am running xfs_repair -n /dev/sda2. The output is
Code:

Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
bad primary superblock - bad magic number !!!

attempting to find secondary superblock...
.................................................found candidate secondary superblock...
unable to verify superblock, continuing...
.........................................................................

With a lot more dot on terminal ...
_________________
Voici la solution : http://www.perdu.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Posts: 54234
Location: 56N 3W

PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

meitnerium,

Quote:
The sda2 partition have been shranked and a sda3 partition created.
That much was harmless.
Its just changing the partition table. Your data was not harmed.

Quote:
The partition have been formated as ext4 and gentoo installed on this partition

These steps overwrite some of the space common to sda3 and the PV called sda2,

Code:
  --- Physical Segments ---
  Physical extent 0 to 1503:
    FREE
  Physical extent 1504 to 398303:
    Logical volume      /dev/cl/home
    Logical extents     0 to 396799
  Physical extent 398304 to 435198:
    FREE


That free space
Code:
Physical extent 398304 to 435198
is 147.560GiB.
How big was sda3?

I don't know XFS at all. I can only wish you good luck.
_________________
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum