View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
crocket Guru
Joined: 29 Apr 2017 Posts: 558
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:09 pm Post subject: Is it not very difficult to use mdev on a desktop computer? |
|
|
I have qutebrowser which depends on qtwebengine which in turn depends on virtual/libudev.
Retroarch has udev USE flag which is enabled for now. dev-libs/libinput requires virtual/udev.
It seems infeasible to unmerge eudev, but I may be able to use mdev without unmerging eudev.
Is mdev not going to break things? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Logicien Veteran
Joined: 16 Sep 2005 Posts: 1555 Location: Montréal
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you emerge all those /dev directory managers you may have the choice to choose the virtual/udev between a list using eselect. En passant, from devfs to udev there a been big debates. Now from udev to eudev and mdev it complicate the debate. For me Udev do a good job with and without systemd but I know only it and devfs. _________________ Paul
Last edited by Logicien on Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:56 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GDH-gentoo Veteran
Joined: 20 Jul 2019 Posts: 1530 Location: South America
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2021 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
crocket wrote: | Is mdev not going to break things? |
Hard to tell without looking at each package's code, but it probably is going to break things. Some libudev functions simply access files in /sys, which are exposed by the kernel itself, so maybe you could get away with that. But other functions access information kept by the udev daemon (/run/udev/* stuff I guess), which would be nonexistent if you run mdev, so that will likely break. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|