Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
False warning after upgrade of nvidia-drivers?
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
causality
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 03 Jun 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:28 pm    Post subject: False warning after upgrade of nvidia-drivers? Reply with quote

My video card is an older Nvidia GeForce GT 520. From the output of "lspci":

Code:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF119 [GeForce GT 520] (rev a1)


I just updated nvidia-drivers (partly so I can run kernel 4.16.x) and received this message:

Code:
* Messages for package x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-396.18-r1:

 * ***** WARNING *****
 *
 * You are currently installing a version of nvidia-drivers that is
 * known not to work with a video card you have installed on your
 * system. If this is intentional, please ignore this. If it is not
 * please perform the following steps:
 *
 * Add the following mask entry to /etc/portage/package.mask by
 * echo ">=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-391.0.0" > /etc/portage/package.mask/nvidia-drivers
 *
 * Failure to perform the steps above could result in a non-working
 * X setup.
 *
 * For more information please read:
 * http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_32667.html


This is confusing because according to the nvidia.com description, driver version 396.18 *does* support this card: http://www.nvidia.com/download/driverResults.aspx/133571/en-us. I checked the ebuild file which led me to the file /usr/portage/eclass/nvidia-driver.eclass. That file gets its data from a different source, http://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/396.18/README/supportedchips.html. That second source indicates that the prior link is more accurate. I have not yet rebooted to load the new kernel and nvidia-drivers version.

Should I expect the driver to fail for this card despite being listed on nvidia.com's download page as supported?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fedeliallalinea
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 30915
Location: here

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In nvidia site suggest 390.48 for your card
_________________
Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Section_8
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 627

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 2:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I got the same warning trying to upgrade to 396.18 on a GTX 970, and just ignored it and installed it anyway - no problems so far.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Juippisi
Developer
Developer


Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Posts: 724
Location: /home

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 5:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fedeliallalinea wrote:
In nvidia site suggest 390.48 for your card


It could be because 396.xx is still the beta-release while 390.48 is the latest stable :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fedeliallalinea
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 30915
Location: here

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 5:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Juippisi wrote:
fedeliallalinea wrote:
In nvidia site suggest 390.48 for your card


It could be because 396.xx is still the beta-release while 390.48 is the latest stable :)

Ah ok thanks for clarification, I thinking that 369.xx was stable for nvidia
_________________
Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yamakuzure
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 2284
Location: Adendorf, Germany

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 8:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fedeliallalinea wrote:
Juippisi wrote:
fedeliallalinea wrote:
In nvidia site suggest 390.48 for your card


It could be because 396.xx is still the beta-release while 390.48 is the latest stable :)

Ah ok thanks for clarification, I thinking that 369.xx was stable for nvidia
The best and most reliable source for you to look up whether your chip is supported or not, is the included <version>/README/supportedchips.html.

Please also see bug 653022 (x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-396.18 should support GTX 480 according to [URL] but the driver does not support device).
_________________
Important German:
  1. "Aha" - German reaction to pretend that you are really interested while giving no f*ck.
  2. "Tja" - German reaction to the apocalypse, nuclear war, an alien invasion or no bread in the house.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Naib
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 6051
Location: Removed by Neddy

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

fedeliallalinea wrote:
Juippisi wrote:
fedeliallalinea wrote:
In nvidia site suggest 390.48 for your card


It could be because 396.xx is still the beta-release while 390.48 is the latest stable :)

Ah ok thanks for clarification, I thinking that 369.xx was stable for nvidia
I saw that as well. I looked at the NV site and my card is supported. I think there is a logic flaw in the ebuild but I haven't had time to correct
_________________
Quote:
Removed by Chiitoo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jburns
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Posts: 1214
Location: Massachusetts USA

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

See https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/1032650/linux/unix-graphics-feature-deprecation-schedule/

If the output of lspci contains Gfxxx in the identification of the card it is a Fermi based card and is not supported.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum