View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ulfox n00b
Joined: 16 May 2017 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sun May 21, 2017 2:27 pm Post subject: Gentoo soc - GSE |
|
|
Hello everyone,
I am happy to announce that this summer I have been given the chance to materialize an idea, next to Gentoo. The project's aim is about creating a stateless Gentoo system with functions that will provide an environment for extra control and configuration options for the mentioned system. A detailed introduction for the above is given on the readme file on the github repository below.
https://github.com/ulfox/GSE
At the end, I want to create something that will be worth that time, so any comment/feedback is most welcome.
Christos.K |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NeddySeagoon Administrator
Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Posts: 54212 Location: 56N 3W
|
Posted: Sun May 21, 2017 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ulfox,
Welcome to Gentoo and good luck with your project. _________________ Regards,
NeddySeagoon
Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ulfox n00b
Joined: 16 May 2017 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sun May 21, 2017 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NeddySeagoon wrote: | ulfox,
Welcome to Gentoo and good luck with your project. |
Thank you |
|
Back to top |
|
|
szatox Advocate
Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 3129
|
Posted: Sun May 21, 2017 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, it's a sort of idea that comes back and again. Apparently many people need something like that but nobody actually reached "production" with his work (yes, including me).
I use different approach though: overlayfs.
I have a few machines running in diskless mode with static system compressed into squashfs (copied to RAM during boot) and an rw ramdisk mounted on top of it, so I can even update or install new software (at cost of increased memory consumption, so it's more of a quick, temporary fix than a way to keep going for years). This approach it extremely simple and works well, so I'm gonna stick with it for some time - possibly changing from switch_root to pivot_root if I need a better backup plan (switch_root after setting up overlay direct access to stored files because the old root in which it was mounted does not exist anymore, so I can't just go there and undo all changes with simple rm -rf *) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ulfox n00b
Joined: 16 May 2017 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2017 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
szatox wrote: | Well, it's a sort of idea that comes back and again. Apparently many people need something like that but nobody actually reached "production" with his work (yes, including me).
I use different approach though: overlayfs.
I have a few machines running in diskless mode with static system compressed into squashfs (copied to RAM during boot) and an rw ramdisk mounted on top of it, so I can even update or install new software (at cost of increased memory consumption, so it's more of a quick, temporary fix than a way to keep going for years). This approach it extremely simple and works well, so I'm gonna stick with it for some time - possibly changing from switch_root to pivot_root if I need a better backup plan (switch_root after setting up overlay direct access to stored files because the old root in which it was mounted does not exist anymore, so I can't just go there and undo all changes with simple rm -rf *) |
Hello,
If you make frequent changes to your system and wish to keep it closer to a normal day-to-day computer, then you should try playing a bit with dockers and maybe implement one in your system. I think you will find fascinating how many options and mobility your system will get.
Christos.K |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|