Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
The Politics of systemd Part 2
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 27, 28, 29  Next  
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
steveL
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 5153
Location: The Peanut Gallery

PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ant P. wrote:
I think recompiling the kernel to add TIPC is overkill. The good kind of overkill maybe, but you're not going to sell bloatmakers on something “different” they can't understand.

So wait, it's ok to recompile to install kdbust, a known crap design?

Just not to enable something that is already there, and proven, when we already make many requirements on both kernel config and userland dependencies.
Quote:
Dumb it down to ideas they already know, say Avahi over loopback, and they might be a bit more enthusiastic.

Lol.

As for "something they can't understand", that would just be indication that they're not the "userland and kernel experts" they claim to be; surely time for us simply to stop listening.

"Alice looked at the Hatter, and the Hatter looked at the Rabbit, who looked at the Cheshire Cat, who simply smiled and disappeared."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yamakuzure
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 2284
Location: Adendorf, Germany

PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 3:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sounds to me like they are all freaking out about their six-sided wheel being such an improvement over their old four-sided wheel, when they just do not use the perfectly circle shaped wheel that's been around for ages because they do not understand its suspension... This is really a sad thing.
_________________
Important German:
  1. "Aha" - German reaction to pretend that you are really interested while giving no f*ck.
  2. "Tja" - German reaction to the apocalypse, nuclear war, an alien invasion or no bread in the house.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
saellaven
l33t
l33t


Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 646

PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yamakuzure wrote:
Sounds to me like they are all freaking out about their six-sided wheel being such an improvement over their old four-sided wheel, when they just do not use the perfectly circle shaped wheel that's been around for ages because they do not understand its suspension... This is really a sad thing.


BUT...

it's all of us that do understand it that are idiots, ignorant, luddites, etc.

BTW - for those that don't read the gentoo mailing lists, the latest idea from the systemd gentoo people (proposed by williamh) is adding /sbin and /usr/sbin to $PATH for everyone and/or possibly merging /bin, /usr/bin and /usr/sbin, into /bin... so it looks like the FDO/"Poettering cabal" usrmerge idiocy is rearing its head again. How long before williamh gets the inept Gentoo Council to dictate this too?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Naib
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 6051
Location: Removed by Neddy

PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The /usr/* sort of makes sense if you know the history of where /usr came from
Merging bin and sbin and/or sbin, /usr/sbin to $PATH looks more like lazyness than need. If there is a program a regular user can run that is in sbin... Why not symlink it into bin (for those few exceptions) or why does such an application exist where it is a root application but a limit user can run part of it? Split it out
_________________
Quote:
Removed by Chiitoo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tony0945
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 5127
Location: Illinois, USA

PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 8:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The user can always modify his path anyway. it sounds more like Windows where users are usually admins with full admin rights anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ct85711
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 1791

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

and look at how secure windows is. I don't care if you look at any version of windows, it has always been a joke on security; and this is without any coding flaws in the windows source code.

Try looking at what a network admin has to go through, just to somewhat lock down a windows computer. The main thing a admin end up doing is using group policies, just to lock down a system. Even then, that's a complete joke in it's self, as you can break through GP's from within windows, let alone switching to command prompt or booting into a boot cd and bypassing the policies all together. Then you have MS's attempt to fs encryption. That's another joke there. What good is an encryption, if you can simply bypass it without needing to breaking it (the encrypted keys isn't needed either).

A while ago, my windows machine got root kitted, and before I zero filled the system, I decided to break through the root-kit (that was using group policy). After a couple days, I managed to break through the root-kit and this was way before I had any experience dealing with group policies. Now that I have more experience with the windows registry and group policies, I'd probably break through it in a fraction of the time. Of course once I removed the rroot-kit, I zero filled that system and started fresh as I couldn't trust that system.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steveL
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 5153
Location: The Peanut Gallery

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Naib wrote:
The /usr/* sort of makes sense if you know the history of where /usr came from

No, it does not.

The history went pretty quickly to how it is used, and a rootfs split still makes an awful lot of sense; it makes it far easier to deal with an initrd, if that's what's needed, as well.

It certainly makes zero sense for Hubbs to start YAF misguided campaign to "follow trends" in known-crap upstreams.

I'm amazed he has so much time on his hands, and can think of plenty of things he could be doing which would be far better uses of that time.
Learning shell properly, for one, instead of winging it via the cargo-cult.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gwr
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 19 Nov 2014
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

saellaven wrote:
latest idea from the systemd gentoo people (proposed by williamh) is adding /sbin and /usr/sbin to $PATH for everyone and/or possibly merging /bin, /usr/bin and /usr/sbin, into /bin


Can someone please explain to me why this is even considered necessary? We've had Linux and Unix systems for literally decades and this has never been a problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Naib
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 6051
Location: Removed by Neddy

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gwr wrote:
saellaven wrote:
latest idea from the systemd gentoo people (proposed by williamh) is adding /sbin and /usr/sbin to $PATH for everyone and/or possibly merging /bin, /usr/bin and /usr/sbin, into /bin


Can someone please explain to me why this is even considered necessary? We've had Linux and Unix systems for literally decades and this has never been a problem.

the /sbin, /usr/sbin part of a users $PATH? probably out of lazyness by either some users or developers when they create applications. Keeping bin and sbin separate is a clear separation between superUser and user applications.

Merging /usr/bin, /usr/sbin into /bin, /sbin... well /usr came about because of small diskspace "back in the day" & this isn't an issue these days BUT NFS base library is still valid, especially for slim clients.
There is at least one distro (arch iirc) that have removed the concept of /usr/*bin. Now that isn't to say it is universally right but there is a point of view.

As long as there is a valid reason to have a separate /usr (partition, nfs) then it isn't worth carrying the combinational logic to deal with IF local merge,ELSEIF ...
_________________
Quote:
Removed by Chiitoo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
khayyam
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 07 Jun 2012
Posts: 6227
Location: Room 101

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gwr wrote:
saellaven wrote:
latest idea from the systemd gentoo people (proposed by williamh) is adding /sbin and /usr/sbin to $PATH for everyone and/or possibly merging /bin, /usr/bin and /usr/sbin, into /bin

Can someone please explain to me why this is even considered necessary? We've had Linux and Unix systems for literally decades and this has never been a problem.

gwr ... because the same people who now claim its broke broke it by putting stuff required to boot in /usr/ ... funny how this stuff comes back and provides the raison d'etre for necessary change ;)

best ... khay
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gwr
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 19 Nov 2014
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Holy crap. Just reading that mailing list thread is enough to drive someone mad.

Quote:
I support this idea. The distinction between bin and sbin is stupid.


No evidence to support what's stupid about it.

Quote:
+1. Just do it.


Good debate from that guy/gal.

Quote:
I'm okay with this. Should we do the same for /usr/bin and /usr/sbin ?


Oh, well why not just do it everywhere, then?

Quote:
I'm the weird one wanting to be able to check how much free
space I've got without going through hoops.


Does no one even care why they were separated in the first place?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gwr
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 19 Nov 2014
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

khayyam wrote:
gwr wrote:
saellaven wrote:
latest idea from the systemd gentoo people (proposed by williamh) is adding /sbin and /usr/sbin to $PATH for everyone and/or possibly merging /bin, /usr/bin and /usr/sbin, into /bin

Can someone please explain to me why this is even considered necessary? We've had Linux and Unix systems for literally decades and this has never been a problem.

gwr ... because the same people who now claim its broke broke it by putting stuff required to boot in /usr/ ... funny how this stuff comes back and provides the raison d'etre for necessary change ;)

best ... khay


Well the can bloody well put it somewhere else!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 6098
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

saellaven wrote:
BTW - for those that don't read the gentoo mailing lists, the latest idea from the systemd gentoo people (proposed by williamh) is adding /sbin and /usr/sbin to $PATH for everyone and/or possibly merging /bin, /usr/bin and /usr/sbin, into /bin


Yeah, nothing like giving a loaded gun to people, most of whom don't know what to do with it.

I never thought that Hubbs could come up with so many stupid ideas. :roll:

The genesis of his "idea" is because of a bug report on osX having to do with go.
(and that was fixed properly by another dev)

Seriously he should be removed from his position to due to extreme incompetence.
_________________
PRIME x570-pro, 3700x, 6.1 zen kernel
gcc 13, profile 17.0 (custom bare multilib), openrc, wayland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gwr
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 19 Nov 2014
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anon-E-moose wrote:

The genesis of his "idea" is because of a bug report on osX having to do with go.
(and that was fixed properly by another dev)


This is not a Gentoo bug nor a OS-X bug. It's a Go bug. It's Go's responsibility to search multiple paths depending upon architecture, not the architecture's job to put everything in the one damn place Go bothers to look.

This is so backwards it's ridiculous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steveL
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 5153
Location: The Peanut Gallery

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Naib wrote:
The /usr/* sort of makes sense if you know the history of where /usr came from

steveL wrote:
No, it does not.

The history went pretty quickly to how it is used, and a rootfs split still makes an awful lot of sense; it makes it far easier to deal with an initrd, if that's what's needed, as well.

Naib wrote:
[blah blah..] but there is a point of view.

..which is a load of twaddle, as we all know.

Stop playing Devil's Advocate, and stop ignoring the rebuttal points put to you.

Blithely carrying on as if they haven't been put, simply makes you look stupid, and/or dishonest.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steveL
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 5153
Location: The Peanut Gallery

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gwr wrote:
This is so backwards it's ridiculous.

"Alice looked at the Hatter.." ;-)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gwr
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 19 Nov 2014
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

steveL wrote:
gwr wrote:
This is so backwards it's ridiculous.

"Alice looked at the Hatter.." ;-)


I am beginning to think that I'm the Mad Hatter in that analogy. :-)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
saellaven
l33t
l33t


Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 646

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

and again, this is why shims, kludges, etc to make existing good things work with braindead ideas is a bad idea... before long, you end up with so many shims and kludges, that the good things become distorted and broken by the stupidity of the braindead ideas.

Just think, this guy is the openrc lead AND sits on the Gentoo Council... he's all for crippling openrc to cover for the shortcomings of systemd, random packages in other distributions (see openrc-run), random software on other operating systems, etc and will happily use the weight of the positions he somehow got himself elected into to do so.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gwr
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 19 Nov 2014
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

saellaven wrote:
and again, this is why shims, kludges, etc to make existing good things work with braindead ideas is a bad idea... before long, you end up with so many shims and kludges, that the good things become distorted and broken by the stupidity of the braindead ideas.


It doesn't even have to be a kludge. If the Go developers refuse to fix their brain-dead scheme of application lookup, then there's no reason why Gentoo can't patch it to work sanely. There's no reason for hacking any paths or changing filesystem layout.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steveL
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 5153
Location: The Peanut Gallery

PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

saellaven wrote:
BTW - for those that don't read the gentoo mailing lists, the latest idea from the systemd gentoo people (proposed by williamh) is adding /sbin and /usr/sbin to $PATH for everyone and/or possibly merging /bin, /usr/bin and /usr/sbin, into /bin

*facepalm*
Anon-E-moose wrote:
Yeah, nothing like giving a loaded gun to people, most of whom don't know what to do with it.
..
The genesis of his "idea" is because of a bug report on osX having to do with go.
(and that was fixed properly by another dev)

gwr wrote:
This is not a Gentoo bug nor a OS-X bug. It's a Go bug. It's Go's responsibility to search multiple paths depending upon architecture, not the architecture's job to put everything in the one damn place Go bothers to look.

This is so backwards it's ridiculous.
..It doesn't even have to be a kludge. If the Go developers refuse to fix their brain-dead scheme of application lookup, then there's no reason why Gentoo can't patch it to work sanely. There's no reason for hacking any paths or changing filesystem layout.

So er, wtf is the point in all this?
Summary seems to be: a total waste of time.

No wonder you're feeling a little surd ;-)
Step lively into the foochur, for 'tis brillig out there..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John R. Graham
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 10589
Location: Somewhere over Atlanta, Georgia

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Split off the OpenRC fork discussion to its own topic: Shall we free-rc?

- John
_________________
I can confirm that I have received between 0 and 499 National Security Letters.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
depontius
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 3509

PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This thread has languished for a bit - horror of horrors!

So in my usual belated reading of Linux Weekly News, I found this little tidbit:
Code:
 You know, I am certainly not the person who wouldn't agree to the concept of breaking eggs to make an omelette. But it's completely unnacceptable to go to the supermarket and break everybody else's eggs too, just because you want to make yourself one little omelette...
-- Lennart Poettering


It's from here: https://lwn.net/Articles/667240/

The first comment points out the irony of that quote, and the response to that is a typical systemd-speak rebuttal.
_________________
.sigs waste space and bandwidth
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gwr
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 19 Nov 2014
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Sat Dec 19, 2015 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

depontius wrote:
This thread has languished for a bit - horror of horrors!

So in my usual belated reading of Linux Weekly News, I found this little tidbit:
Code:
 You know, I am certainly not the person who wouldn't agree to the concept of breaking eggs to make an omelette. But it's completely unnacceptable to go to the supermarket and break everybody else's eggs too, just because you want to make yourself one little omelette...
-- Lennart Poettering


It's from here: https://lwn.net/Articles/667240/

The first comment points out the irony of that quote, and the response to that is a typical systemd-speak rebuttal.


He's not breaking any eggs to make breakfast. He's saying everyone should only eat cereal made by him for every meal and eggs are old-fashioned and lame.

Edit: And the cereal is broken.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yamakuzure
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 2284
Location: Adendorf, Germany

PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

gwr wrote:
Edit: And the cereal is broken.
But the new cereal breaks the bowl, so you'll need a new one anyway...
_________________
Important German:
  1. "Aha" - German reaction to pretend that you are really interested while giving no f*ck.
  2. "Tja" - German reaction to the apocalypse, nuclear war, an alien invasion or no bread in the house.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 6098
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
While Red Hat is growing by cross-selling and large deals, Red Hat's CEO Jim Whitehurst commented that a big part of his company's go-to-market motion is taking share from competitors.

"Whether that was UNIX to Linux or Windows to Linux or WebLogic to JBoss, and that continues and actually cloud accelerates that," Whitehurst said. "So we continue to take share nicely as well as win solid share of new workloads that are moving to cloud."


http://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/red-hat-continues-to-grow-by-taking-share-from-others.html

Bwahahaha

Competitors? Like ubuntu, debian, etc. and here they thought sysd and crew would save them. :lol:
_________________
PRIME x570-pro, 3700x, 6.1 zen kernel
gcc 13, profile 17.0 (custom bare multilib), openrc, wayland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 27, 28, 29  Next
Page 5 of 29

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum