Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Debian dropping the LSB
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
gwr
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 19 Nov 2014
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 6:06 am    Post subject: Debian dropping the LSB Reply with quote

I find this rather shocking.

https://lwn.net/Articles/658809/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
arnvidr
l33t
l33t


Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 629
Location: Oslo, Norway

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 8:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why?
_________________
Noone wrote:
anything
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
khayyam
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 07 Jun 2012
Posts: 6227
Location: Room 101

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 9:20 am    Post subject: Re: Debian dropping the LSB Reply with quote

gwr wrote:
I find this rather shocking.

gwr ... it makes sense though, first they drop LSD, then they drop LSB ... LSA is probably next in the firing line, and I imagine LSC is feeling somewhat passed over ;)

best ... khay
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roman_Gruber
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 03 Oct 2006
Posts: 3846
Location: Austro Bavaria

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 9:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

To make things complicated.

Nothing worse as a linux distro which do not follow rules.

Sadly as linux mint, ubuntu are based on debian the things will get worse.

I can not claim that these distros were easy to tweak anyway but now they will get much more worse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
khayyam
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 07 Jun 2012
Posts: 6227
Location: Room 101

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

tw04l124 wrote:
Nothing worse as a linux distro which do not follow rules.

tw04l124 ... what rules though? If you're freedesktop.org you can define such "specifications" and people will link to them (as seen in the above LWN article) as though this is somehow a "standard". A lot of lip-service is paid to "standards" but it involves a lot of fingers crossed behind backs.

Linus Torvalds wrote:
First off, I'd suggest printing out a copy of the GNU coding standards, and NOT read it. Burn them, it's a great symbolic gesture.

... so, who's defining the "standard"?

best ... khay
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fitzcarraldo
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Posts: 2038
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 6:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was under the impression Gentoo is not completely LSB compliant either: Gentoo not LSB compliant?
_________________
Clevo W230SS: amd64, VIDEO_CARDS="intel modesetting nvidia".
Compal NBLB2: ~amd64, xf86-video-ati. Dual boot Win 7 Pro 64-bit.
OpenRC systemd-utils[udev] elogind KDE on both.

My blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Naib
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 6053
Location: Removed by Neddy

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This might not be so doom and gloom. The LSB covers a lot of things like ... using RPS's for package management & specific package versions
The FileSystem Hierarchy and ABI are quite important to ensure all linux distro's are in essence interoperable

As long as debian sticks to the FSH and the ABI and makes some key packages available ... meh.
_________________
Quote:
Removed by Chiitoo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
roki942
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Posts: 285
Location: Seattle

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 10:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fitzcarraldo wrote:
I was under the impression Gentoo is not completely LSB compliant either: Gentoo not LSB compliant?
I found this part of the tread interesting and it's from 2004
Quote:

OTH, I doubt that the present generation of binary distros (even 100%
LSB-compliant) will get very far with "enable [ing] software
applications to run on any compliant system." because of the inherent
problem of matching up different levels of binary libraries (RPM hell
in all its glory).

IMO, the system structure of Gentoo is better than the LSB which seems
to have been designed (as I see it) to institutionalize the RedHat
system structure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Abraxas
l33t
l33t


Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 814

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 2:19 pm    Post subject: No need to worry about it Reply with quote

You can still make it compliant. They are just not going to go through all the time created standard symlinks and such for things that are not even installed. What has the LSB really done for Linux anyway? It seemed like a good idea at the time but i'm not sure it has been very helpful.
_________________
Time makes more converts than reason. - Thomas Paine
Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. - Mark Twain
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum