View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Illiander Apprentice
Joined: 22 Feb 2011 Posts: 252
|
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 3:05 pm Post subject: new system, old home directory, MATE, epiphany and evolution |
|
|
I just rebuilt my system from stage3 due to some crippling config issues when I was updating, and I find myself not able to install the pre-systemd/pre-gnome3 versions of epiphany and evolution.
Since MATE has renamed a bunch of other things for easier compatibility, I was wondering if anyone knew what they renamed epiphany and evolution to, and if there's an easy config/bookmarks/email accounts migration tool floating around? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eccerr0r Watchman
Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 9677 Location: almost Mile High in the USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Epiphany is still Epiphany. Evolution is still Evolution... I don't think they forked either, unlike what they did with the other Gnome applications as these are not "core" applications...
Unfortunately the 2.x versions of these are no longer in portage, then again not sure if they would compile anymore anyway. _________________ Intel Core i7 2700K/Radeon R7 250/24GB DDR3/256GB SSD
What am I supposed watching? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Leio Developer
Joined: 27 Feb 2003 Posts: 494 Location: Estonia
|
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
GNOME 3 versions of epiphany and evolution don't depend on systemd. MATE is also converting to gtk3, no longterm issue there. Not sure how epiphany goes to your liking with its headerbar usage and how it adapts to non-gnome3 environment, but it does seem to save vertical space quite nicely in a GNOME3 environment, as the location bar is integrated in it there.
I don't think evolution is anywhere yet with headerbars or whatnot, just install it. I know plenty of people using evolution even in tiling window managers, MATE should be a cakewalk. _________________ GNOME team lead; GStreamer; MIPS/ARM64 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Illiander Apprentice
Joined: 22 Feb 2011 Posts: 252
|
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Evolution requires gnome-base/gnome-desktop-3.16.2, which I would be very surprised if it didn't need systemd. (Which, incidentally, sums up my problems with gnome3 in a nutshell. Small programs that do one job, and do it well, with a minimum dependency graph are so much better than tying everything together into one big monolithic pileup)
Guess I'm looking for a new email client as well... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eccerr0r Watchman
Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 9677 Location: almost Mile High in the USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Illiander wrote: | Evolution requires gnome-base/gnome-desktop-3.16.2, which I would be very surprised if it didn't need systemd. (Which, incidentally, sums up my problems with gnome3 in a nutshell. Small programs that do one job, and do it well, with a minimum dependency graph are so much better than tying everything together into one big monolithic pileup)
Guess I'm looking for a new email client as well... |
It's mostly the session management that requires systemd. Since you're not installing those core components, there's a chance that it doesn't need systemd.
I tried getting a dependency graph trying to install evolution on my server (that doesn't use systemd) - and didn't seem to see it needed to build systemd. A lot of other stuff wanted to get installed however... then again that's what you need for a fairly elaborate GUI.
(I tried running epiphany-3 on my xfce4 machine, seems to work. However this is a systemd machine and I do have the rest of gnome3 installed... I'm not running gnome3 at the moment because fglrx/ati-drivers pukes all over systemd.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ct85711 Veteran
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 Posts: 1791
|
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well, looking on my system, and seeing what portage says for me. systemd wasn't pulled in for either packages (I'm running xfce with systemd hard masked for me, so I would have seen it fail for me). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Illiander Apprentice
Joined: 22 Feb 2011 Posts: 252
|
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
And what do you know, evolution doesn't need systemd.
I stand very corrected. Apologies.
I do have a *very* aggressive set of systemd/gnome3 masks. I seem to remember MATE needing them at some point, probably when it was an overlay, rather than in the main portage tree. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|