| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Erlend
Guru
Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 493
|
 Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 11:36 am Post subject: abi_x86_32 change has rendered portage unusable [SOLVED] |
 |
|
Probably the worst thing to happen in portage for 10 years...
Seriously what's the best way to deal with this stupid flag? Ever since the change was introduced in March I've been unable to run 'emerge -uDN world' without getting pages upon pages of blocked packages.
I added all the abi_x86_32 use flags to /etc/portage/package.use that portage suggested to me, e.g.
| Code: | # required by media-libs/gst-plugins-base-0.10.36-r2::gentoo[orc]
# required by media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg-0.10.13_p201211-r3::gentoo
# required by media-plugins/gst-plugins-meta-0.10-r10::gentoo[ffmpeg]
# required by net-im/pidgin-2.10.10::gentoo[gstreamer]
# required by @selected
# required by @world (argument)
>=dev-lang/orc-0.4.23 abi_x86_32
# required by media-video/ffmpeg-2.6.2::gentoo[xvid,encode]
# required by virtual/ffmpeg-9-r1::gentoo
# required by media-plugins/alsa-plugins-1.0.28::gentoo[ffmpeg]
# required by media-sound/pulseaudio-5.0-r7::gentoo[alsa,alsa-plugin]
# required by net-im/skype-4.3.0.37-r1::gentoo
# required by @selected
# required by @world (argument)
>=media-libs/xvid-1.3.3 abi_x86_32
|
But this just results in this:
| Code: | [blocks B ] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs[-abi_x86_32(-)] ("app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs[-abi_x86_32(-)]" is blocking dev-libs/libtasn1-4.5, dev-libs/nettle-2.7.1-r1, sys-apps/dbus-1.8.16, dev-libs/expat-2.1.0-r4, dev-libs/openssl-0.9.8z_p6, dev-libs/glib-2.42.2, media-libs/tiff-4.0.3-r6, dev-libs/json-c-0.11-r1, net-print/cups-2.0.2-r1, media-libs/libpng-1.6.16, dev-libs/libxml2-2.9.2-r1, media-libs/lcms-2.6-r1, media-libs/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.1, dev-libs/libgpg-error-1.13, sys-fs/udev-216, net-dns/libidn-1.29, media-libs/libmng-2.0.2-r1, dev-libs/libffi-3.0.13-r1, dev-db/sqlite-3.8.10.1, net-libs/gnutls-3.3.15, sys-devel/llvm-3.5.0)
[blocks B ] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs[-abi_x86_32(-)] ("app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs[-abi_x86_32(-)]" is blocking sys-libs/gpm-1.20.7-r2, sys-libs/zlib-1.2.8-r1, sys-apps/tcp-wrappers-7.6.22-r1, dev-libs/libpcre-8.36, dev-libs/gmp-5.1.3-r1, sys-libs/readline-6.2_p5-r1, app-arch/bzip2-1.0.6-r6, dev-libs/openssl-1.0.1m, sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r3, sys-apps/attr-2.4.47-r1)
[blocks B ] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs[-abi_x86_32] ("app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs[-abi_x86_32]" is blocking sys-apps/util-linux-2.25.2-r2)
[blocks B ] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs[-abi_x86_32] ("app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs[-abi_x86_32]" is blocking dev-libs/libgcrypt-1.5.4-r1, dev-libs/lzo-2.08)
|
I'm half-tempted to uninstall then reinstall my Gentoo box to get around this hell. Any other suggestions?
_________________
Thunar-thumbnailers
Raw-thumbnailer
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/6878/image/1/
Last edited by Erlend on Tue May 19, 2015 3:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
asturm
Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 8936
|
| Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
The corresponding news item contained the following part:
| Code: | | $ emerge -C 'app-emulation/emul-linux-x86*' |
Have you done so, and if not what is the result afterwards? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Erlend
Guru
Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 493
|
| Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| genstorm wrote: | The corresponding news item contained the following part:
| Code: | | $ emerge -C 'app-emulation/emul-linux-x86*' |
Have you done so, and if not what is the result afterwards? |
Hi - thanks for replying to fast.
Yep had already done that, and just to check I ran 'equery l app-emulation/emul-linux-x86*' to be sure:
| Code: |
!!! No installed packages matching 'app-emulation/emul-linux-x86*'
* Searching for app-emulation/emul-linux-x86* ...
|
But when I run 'emerge -upvND world' I notice:
| Code: | | [ebuild N #] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-20140508-r12::gentoo USE="development kerberos ldap pam" ABI_X86="-32" 0 KiB |
which I think is being pulled in by wine-1.6.2 (from emerge -upvNDt world).
_________________
Thunar-thumbnailers
Raw-thumbnailer
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/6878/image/1/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
asturm
Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 8936
|
| Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK, so wine still has a lot of either-or dependencies in its list, that means a dependency is fulfilled by either the native x86_32 library or its old binary counterpart from app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs.
- Do you have anything set inside package.mask that could exclude a corresponding native x86_32 dependency required for wine?
- To verify if it really is wine pulling in emul-linux-x86-baselibs, put app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs into package.mask and see what's going to complain
Last edited by asturm on Sat May 16, 2015 3:46 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoidMage
Watchman
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 6196
|
| Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| genstorm wrote: | | OK, so wine still has a lot of either-or dependencies in its list, that means a dependency is fulfilled by either the native x86_32 library or its old binary counterpart from app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs. |
Unless I'm missing something major, wine has no dependencies, that can't be met by multilib ebuilds.
...except perhaps the little problem with samba: until samba 4 gets a multilib ebuild, you're stuck with samba 3.
It seems that both multilib herd and samba maintainers have put this under their respective SEP fields.
It's to a point understandable, given the complexity of samba build system, but eventually someone's got to get to it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
asturm
Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 8936
|
| Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| VoidMage wrote: | | genstorm wrote: | | OK, so wine still has a lot of either-or dependencies in its list, that means a dependency is fulfilled by either the native x86_32 library or its old binary counterpart from app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs. |
Unless I'm missing something major, wine has no dependencies, that can't be met by multilib ebuilds. |
Yeah, what I said.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Erlend
Guru
Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 493
|
| Posted: Sun May 17, 2015 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| genstorm wrote: | OK, so wine still has a lot of either-or dependencies in its list, that means a dependency is fulfilled by either the native x86_32 library or its old binary counterpart from app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs.
- Do you have anything set inside package.mask that could exclude a corresponding native x86_32 dependency required for wine?
- To verify if it really is wine pulling in emul-linux-x86-baselibs, put app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs into package.mask and see what's going to complain |
I removed wine to be sure, and now acroread-9.5.5-r2 is pulling in emul-linux-x86-baselibs... I think that's a hard dependency?
_________________
Thunar-thumbnailers
Raw-thumbnailer
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/6878/image/1/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Erlend
Guru
Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 493
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
asturm
Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 8936
|
| Posted: Sun May 17, 2015 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually not, acroread can also work with native multilibs (including ldap). Think hard if you really need acroread on your system though.
Different story with overlays - make sure it is up to date, if yes, start bugging the overlay maintainers. Already had wondered if it was the steam overlay... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Erlend
Guru
Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 493
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
depontius
Advocate
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 3509
|
| Posted: Tue May 19, 2015 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| genstorm wrote: | | Think hard if you really need acroread on your system though. |
I generally use xournal, and there are other alternative pdf viewers. But I also have acroread installed, because sometimes, notably before April 15, substitutes just don't do.
_________________
.sigs waste space and bandwidth |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Portage & Programming
