View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
d-fens Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 09 Jan 2004 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sorry it wasn't udma , just dma under Device Drivers | ATA/ATAPI/MFM/RLL support
[*] Generic PCI bus-master DMA support
[*] Use PCI DMA by default when available
alsa: make sure you compiled the drivers as modules
pppoed: you should provide more specific information like what dmesg says about it or the output of lsmod |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Phlogiston Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2004 Posts: 1925 Location: Europe, Swizerland
|
Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rumil wrote: | evermind wrote: |
After removing this line it works for me
Code: |
/usr/src/linux-2.6.4_rc2-love1/fs/proc/generic.c
@@ -661,7 +661,6 @@
proc_alloc_map);
proc_kill_inodes(de);
de->nlink = 0;
- BUG_ON(de->subdir);
if (!atomic_read(&de->count))
free_proc_entry(de);
else {
|
|
Yeah, works for me as well. Thanks! |
hmm I have the same problem:
Code: | ------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/proc/generic.c:664!
invalid operand: 0000 [#1]
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<c01827c9>] Tainted: PF VLI
EFLAGS: 00010282
EIP is at remove_proc_entry+0xe9/0x160
eax: dda3ce80 ebx: de4be830 ecx: 00000000 edx: de527c80
esi: 00000005 edi: ddb6a500 ebp: 00000000 esp: de831e54
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process rmmod (pid: 6338, threadinfo=de830000 task=df3353c0)
Stack: ddb6a500 ddb6a548 ddb6a500 dda3cf80 ddb6a548 e1a812f0 df393c98 00000880
e1a772d7 ddb6a548 de4be800 dec39d60 dda3cfc8 dec39c14 dec39c14 dec39c14
e1a76c35 df393c98 de4be800 00000880 00000000 dec39c14 00000000 e1a74ca7
Call Trace:
[<e1a772d7>] snd_info_unregister+0x87/0xd0 [snd]
[<e1a76c35>] snd_info_card_free+0x35/0xa0 [snd]
[<e1a74ca7>] snd_card_free+0xd7/0x250 [snd]
[<c016745e>] destroy_inode+0x4e/0x50
[<c0168566>] iput_final+0x26/0x30
[<e1db02a9>] snd_via82xx_remove+0x19/0x30 [snd_via82xx]
[<c02b5adb>] pci_device_remove+0x3b/0x40
[<c0304354>] device_release_driver+0x64/0x70
[<c0304380>] driver_detach+0x20/0x30
[<c03045ad>] bus_remove_driver+0x3d/0x80
[<c03049c3>] driver_unregister+0x13/0x28
[<c02b5cb6>] pci_unregister_driver+0x16/0x30
[<e1db02cf>] alsa_card_via82xx_exit+0xf/0x13 [snd_via82xx]
[<c01314dc>] sys_delete_module+0x13c/0x190
[<c0145bab>] do_munmap+0x11b/0x150
[<c04411bb>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Code: 01 00 00 00 89 44 24 0c 8b 47 04 89 44 24 08 8b 44 24 28 8b 40 04 c7 04 24 30 42 47 c0 89 44 24 04 e8 3c be f9 ff e9 77 ff ff ff <0f> 0b 98 02 90 c7 46 c0 eb b4 8b 44 24 28 66 ff 48 0a eb 86 8d
<3>ALSA sound/core/pcm_lib.c:198: Unexpected hw_pointer value [1] (stream = 0, delta: -5669, max jitter = 8192): wrong interrupt acknowledge?
ALSA sound/core/pcm_lib.c:198: Unexpected hw_pointer value [1] (stream = 0, delta: -4095, max jitter = 8192): wrong interrupt acknowledge?
ALSA sound/core/pcm_lib.c:198: Unexpected hw_pointer value [1] (stream = 0, delta: -2047, max jitter = 8192): wrong interrupt acknowledge? |
But if I remove the line
I got this compile error
Code: |
fs/proc/generic.c: In function `remove_proc_entry':
fs/proc/generic.c:662: error: syntax error before ';' token
make[2]: *** [fs/proc/generic.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2
|
Whats wrong? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bssteph l33t
Joined: 26 Feb 2003 Posts: 652 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2004 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
You removed the wrong line. You should remove the line with the - in front of it, that is,
Code: | BUG_ON(de->subdir); |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
seppe Guru
Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Posts: 431 Location: Hove, Antwerp, Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2004 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Matje wrote: |
On a side note: I've disabled preemtible kernel now and it really makes a difference on my system. Before it seemed rather sluggish when there was heavy hard-drive activity, sometimes even disallowing me too take any action, now my box seems to respond faster when wanting to do multi-tasking. I've read some other reports about slowness, so I thought I'd just mention it |
What?! So I should disable preëmptible kernel? People always told me this was the major advantage of the 2.6 kernel tree; it should speed things up. So should I disable this, or not?
Besides, what other things should I enable in my kernel to get more speed with love-sources? _________________ nitro-sources, because between stable and experimental there exists only speed
Latest release I made: 2.6.13.2-nitro1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Phlogiston Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2004 Posts: 1925 Location: Europe, Swizerland
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2004 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
bssteph wrote: | You removed the wrong line. You should remove the line with the - in front of it, that is,
Code: | BUG_ON(de->subdir); |
|
ahh ok, thx |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|