Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
linux-2.6.4-love1 aka "Angry Love Aardvark"
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
neenee
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 20 Jul 2003
Posts: 1786

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

here are mirrors for the files (bsstephs host was unreachable
early this morning (european morning), so i decided to mirror):

main patch
small fix

*update*

thanks to ejohnson (from #love-sources), there is now an ebuild
and a love-sources patch which includes the fix (for packet writing
and the loopback device):

patch (fix included)
ebuild for this version
_________________
proud to be a scout and a chronic penguin hugger
Legion of Lore - site


Last edited by neenee on Fri Mar 12, 2004 6:17 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asimon
l33t
l33t


Joined: 27 Jun 2002
Posts: 979
Location: Germany, Old Europe

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some nitpicking:

The love-source ebuilds are not part of Gentoo, they are not in Portage, and as far as we can see this won't change anytime soon.

Thus I just wonder why every love-sources ebuild is copyrighted by Gentoo Technologies, Inc.? Just lazy cut&past?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ejohnson
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 20 Jan 2004
Posts: 140

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Love does use the ebuild system, so I believe the mention of Gentoo Technologies, Inc. stems from that. From now on any of my ebuilds will be in accordance with what steel300 deams official :)

Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
discomfitor
l33t
l33t


Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 927
Location: None

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great job bssteph!
_________________
There is no substitute for experience.
Imperfection indicates a lack of effort.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
evermind
Guru
Guru


Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 322

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

teilo wrote:
Using the new radeonfb driver:

Code:
CC      drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.o
drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c: In function `radeonfb_pci_register':
drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c:2286: error: too few arguments to function `register_framebuffer'
make[3]: *** [drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [drivers/video/aty] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers/video] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2


look here that worked for me on 2.6.4-rc1
maybe here too - but I haven´t tested
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=142313&highlight=radeon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BobDylan
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 10 Dec 2003
Posts: 135
Location: On The Road

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Where does the fb_sysfs_udev.patch.bz2 come from ?

Is it possible to download this patch separately or to extract it from the love patch ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bssteph
l33t
l33t


Joined: 26 Feb 2003
Posts: 651
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry about the server. I don't know what happened but all the patches seem to be up now (again), so you can fetch from there again (or use one of our kindly mirrors).

I glanced at the VM patches but decided against those for now, just because as you can see I have my hands full with all the driver problems introduced in vanilla and mm.

A heads up, there are patches for missing symbols on LKML for DVB, ext3 journaled quota, and wavefront. If you need such patches find your favorite archive.

nepenthe:
Apply the fixes patch.

evermind and teilo:
Sorry I missed the radeonfb fix. Looks like a number of other framebuffer devices need the fix too. If anyone has the "too few arguments to function `register_framebuffer'" error, edit the file specified, go to line number, and add ", NULL" to the function so it looks something like this:
Code:
register_framebuffer(info, NULL)


As we can see there are a bunch of problems that seem to be out of my control. I may release a little-changed love2 that applies all these fixes but I haven't decided yet.

Next release will include the updated AMD76x Power Management for SMP patch, whenever that next release occurs.

Reiser4 + mm is messy. Hoping namesys releases a patch so I don't have to hack away.

Please make other driver requests here so I don't miss them.
_________________
Website - All sorts of nonsense (some of it actually Linux related)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
teilo
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 20 Jun 2003
Posts: 276
Location: Minneapolis, MN

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

evermind wrote:

look here that worked for me on 2.6.4-rc1
maybe here too - but I haven´t tested
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=142313&highlight=radeon


Yes. That fixed it for me. Thank you.
_________________
Teilo who is called Teilo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fire-Reiher
n00b
n00b


Joined: 20 Dec 2002
Posts: 28

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

acerhk fails when using SMP, here are the messages:
Code:

  CC [M]  drivers/acerhk/acerhk.o
In file included from include/asm/smp.h:18,
                 from include/linux/smp.h:17,
                 from include/linux/sched.h:23,
                 from include/linux/module.h:10,
                 from drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:33:
include/asm/mpspec.h:6:25: mach_mpspec.h: No such file or directory
In file included from include/asm/smp.h:18,
                 from include/linux/smp.h:17,
                 from include/linux/sched.h:23,
                 from include/linux/module.h:10,
                 from drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:33:
include/asm/mpspec.h:8: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:9: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:10: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:12: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:19: error: `MAX_APICS' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:20: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:20: error: conflicting types for `mp_bus_id_to_type'
include/asm/mpspec.h:8: error: previous declaration of `mp_bus_id_to_type'
include/asm/mpspec.h:22: error: `MAX_IRQ_SOURCES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:24: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/mpspec.h:24: error: conflicting types for `mp_bus_id_to_pci_bus'
include/asm/mpspec.h:12: error: previous declaration of `mp_bus_id_to_pci_bus'
include/asm/mpspec.h:50: error: `MAX_APICS' undeclared here (not in a function)
In file included from include/asm/smp.h:20,
                 from include/linux/smp.h:17,
                 from include/linux/sched.h:23,
                 from include/linux/module.h:10,
                 from drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:33:
include/asm/io_apic.h:160: error: `MAX_IRQ_SOURCES' undeclared here (not in a function)
include/asm/io_apic.h:160: error: conflicting types for `mp_irqs'
include/asm/mpspec.h:22: error: previous declaration of `mp_irqs'
In file included from include/linux/smp.h:17,
                 from include/linux/sched.h:23,
                 from include/linux/module.h:10,
                 from drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:33:
include/asm/smp.h:71:26: mach_apicdef.h: No such file or directory
In file included from include/linux/smp.h:17,
                 from include/linux/sched.h:23,
                 from include/linux/module.h:10,
                 from drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:33:
include/asm/smp.h: In function `hard_smp_processor_id':
include/asm/smp.h:75: warning: implicit declaration of function `GET_APIC_ID'
drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:52:1: warning: "MODULE_VERSION" redefined
In file included from drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:33:
include/linux/module.h:146:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c: At top level:
drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:1624: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS'
drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:1624: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:322: warning: `pbutton_fct' defined but not used
drivers/acerhk/acerhk.c:350: warning: `wbutton_fct_1' defined but not used
make[2]: *** [drivers/acerhk/acerhk.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/acerhk] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ed0n
l33t
l33t


Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 638
Location: Prishtine/Kosove

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

working good here :) .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chrisyu
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 10 Apr 2003
Posts: 196
Location: China

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 12:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

evermind wrote:


look here that worked for me on 2.6.4-rc1
maybe here too - but I haven´t tested
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=142313&highlight=radeon


Yes, It works. Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Daagar
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 14 Mar 2003
Posts: 78

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 3:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Info on the au8820 patch was requested: During the kernel build I get the following:


Code:

sound/built-in.o(.init.text+0x20ea): In function `snd_vortex_new_pcm':
: undefined reference to `snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pci_pages_for_all'


I also get warnings while compiling au8820_pcm.c at line 406 saying 'implicit declaration of snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pci_pages_for_all'.

This will occur if I compile as a module as well...

For what it is woth, the au8820 stuff works fine in kernel 2.4 with alsa v1.0.3 installed separately (not in the kernel).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
charlieg
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 30 Jul 2002
Posts: 2148
Location: Manchester UK

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 3:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Working well here!
_________________
Want Free games?
Free Gamer - open source games list & commentary

Open source web-enabled rich UI platform: Vexi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ejohnson
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 20 Jan 2004
Posts: 140

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 4:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Daagar wrote:
Info on the au8820 patch was requested: During the kernel build I get the following:


Code:

sound/built-in.o(.init.text+0x20ea): In function `snd_vortex_new_pcm':
: undefined reference to `snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pci_pages_for_all'


I also get warnings while compiling au8820_pcm.c at line 406 saying 'implicit declaration of snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pci_pages_for_all'.

This will occur if I compile as a module as well...

For what it is woth, the au8820 stuff works fine in kernel 2.4 with alsa v1.0.3 installed separately (not in the kernel).


I don't think that patched applied cleanly either. I'll check it out in the mean time and if I can find the solution I'll email you the patch
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wikt
n00b
n00b


Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 21

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

works fine here :) I compiled Love src the first time, all went fine :)

gj guys!
_________________
# emerge life
emerge: there are no masked or unmasked ebuilds to satisfy "life".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chefakito
n00b
n00b


Joined: 22 Apr 2003
Posts: 38
Location: Richmond, BC, CAN

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

After a few initial issues with compilation and a few panic moments with the system crashing (can't seem to make oldconfig from an earlier love kernel), we finally have a working linux-2.6.4-love1 kernel.

nothing that a make mrproper can't fix. :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bssteph
l33t
l33t


Joined: 26 Feb 2003
Posts: 651
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ejohnson wrote:
Daagar wrote:
Info on the au8820 patch was requested: During the kernel build I get the following:


Code:

sound/built-in.o(.init.text+0x20ea): In function `snd_vortex_new_pcm':
: undefined reference to `snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pci_pages_for_all'


I also get warnings while compiling au8820_pcm.c at line 406 saying 'implicit declaration of snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pci_pages_for_all'.

This will occur if I compile as a module as well...

For what it is woth, the au8820 stuff works fine in kernel 2.4 with alsa v1.0.3 installed separately (not in the kernel).


I don't think that patched applied cleanly either. I'll check it out in the mean time and if I can find the solution I'll email you the patch

Keep me informed... I looked at that (admittedly, a bit late at night) and the most I can tell you now is that the function seems to have disappeared somewhere between 2.6.4-rc1-love3 and 2.6.4-rc2-love1. Sorry I can't look more, I'm in lecture and my prof is giving me glances.
_________________
Website - All sorts of nonsense (some of it actually Linux related)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Daagar
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 14 Mar 2003
Posts: 78

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 3:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not a problem at all! It was just an FYI, since I happen to have an au8820 and was compiling love-sources :) That's probably enough info for me to fix it myself if I have the time. Failing that, I'm willing to test anyone that makes a patch. Aren't I so helpful? ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bssteph
l33t
l33t


Joined: 26 Feb 2003
Posts: 651
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No problem, sounds good.

For those having oopses with SCSI-like devices when you remove them (USB thumb drives, etc) check out this thread on linux-scsi:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=107915633404247&w=2
Like I said in the post, I doubt that's the "right" fix, but for those that find it critical it does stop the oops.
_________________
Website - All sorts of nonsense (some of it actually Linux related)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ejohnson
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 20 Jan 2004
Posts: 140

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bssteph,

There was a one line warning thrown up during the patching. Its fairly easy to see, infact its the last element to be shown when patching the love1 patch.

I looked into it when it happened the first time, but it appears not to be a failed hunk, hence no .rej file, but it does appear to be a warning. I'll give it some more time after work. Thanks for pointing it out Daagar
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
uglyb0b
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 07 Sep 2003
Posts: 280

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No ebuild?! But bssteph, I'm lazy! Oh well, not like I'm going to go out and write one. Cheers.
_________________
Blog.

Linux geek and Mac whore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bssteph
l33t
l33t


Joined: 26 Feb 2003
Posts: 651
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ejohnson wrote:
bssteph,

There was a one line warning thrown up during the patching. Its fairly easy to see, infact its the last element to be shown when patching the love1 patch.

I looked into it when it happened the first time, but it appears not to be a failed hunk, hence no .rej file, but it does appear to be a warning. I'll give it some more time after work. Thanks for pointing it out Daagar

Did you use an ebuild to get the vanilla or mm? They both change the top level Makefile ever so slightly and that could cause adding the EXTRAVERSION to break. That'd also explain the fact that there's no .rej file, the ebuild moves the original Makefile out of the way to Makefile.orig
_________________
Website - All sorts of nonsense (some of it actually Linux related)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Surye
n00b
n00b


Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

neenee wrote:
ebuild for this version


uglyb0b wrote:
No ebuild?! But bssteph, I'm lazy! Oh well, not like I'm going to go out and write one. Cheers.


Read the whole thread =P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
uglyb0b
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 07 Sep 2003
Posts: 280

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmmm. I am pretty damn ignorant.
_________________
Blog.

Linux geek and Mac whore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
neenee
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 20 Jul 2003
Posts: 1786

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

it's a phase :wink:
_________________
proud to be a scout and a chronic penguin hugger
Legion of Lore - site
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum