Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Xorg forked to XLibre
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
szatox
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 27 Aug 2013
Posts: 3679

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 9:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bent wrote:
mrbassie wrote:
Danger hair. What do you see?

Good heavens, a hairdo! All of a sudden, your "thousand words" is starting to look pretty shallow. I trust you're familiar with the term "thousand"?
* I know it's about more than the haircut for you, I'm not stupid and I've got you worked out. But if all you're prepared to put to words is vague allusions, you're just being a coward.
~~/snip/~~
To say nothing of the actual fork, Alpine (et al.) want to keep people like you - who clearly hate them anyway - out of their communities, to stop their discussion boards filling with Facebook-esque garbage, such as your contributions in this thread. You might (pretend to) not see why, but they do, and I do too. You don't care whether Alpine adopt Xlibre or not, you're not going to use their distro anyway. For you, it's just more fuel for some weird persecution complex.

I'll help you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aposematism :lol:

Well, I had you worked out back at "divisive".
Then you got my hopes up for a while, but I'm still waiting for your replay on framing. Are you going to raise to the challenge you yourself issued, or will you let let it fade away?
And although I personally don't mind a good shitposting session once in a while, can you tell me why did you get so worked up about what people on the outside do? You're probably right mrbiassie doesn't care what Apline does, and neither do I. But you're accusing him (and me, an a bunch of other people, unless I missed some personal beef with him specifically) of hating Alpine, while we were just discussing a particular event which happened on IRC, which at the time was actually related to the topic of xlibre.
Have you noticed that not a single person told them that they must package xlibre?
If they can have their perspective, why can't we have ours, er? Can't we disagree with their reasoning? Why is is so important to you that people working together on one thing must agree on everything else too?
I don't care what people believe as long as it doesn't get in the way. Mesa and Wine are doing pretty well, so I'm not interested in their politics and I'm not going to even verify any claims made about them. But I know to avoid anything that is advertised by woke terminology, because it shows they're fixated on the wrong things, ignore merit, and will totally botch it. Who is the one pushing his ideology on everyone else, er? "CoC violation if anyone brings up xlibre again!!!!!"

bent wrote:
szatox wrote:
1) Distracted from what?

A calm and reasoned discussion on the XLibre fork, as opposed one built on hand-waving and hyperbole, talk of "civil war", "X11 dying", unnamed "somebodies" with their finger on the scales. Crafty use of the word "following" to make it appear Ubuntu and GNOME are reacting, when the reality is far more boring, that GNOME has been planning the deprecation for over a year and Ubuntu is merely swimming with the current.

_________________
Make Computing Fun Again
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mrbassie
l33t
l33t


Joined: 31 May 2013
Posts: 855
Location: Go past the sign for cope, right at the sign for seethe. If you see the target you've missed it.

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bent wrote:
mrbassie wrote:
Danger hair. What do you see?

Good heavens, a hairdo! All of a sudden, your "thousand words" is starting to look pretty shallow. I trust you're familiar with the term "thousand"?

Yet of the person at the centre of all this, you apparently know nothing:
mrbassie wrote:
Can I just ask what causes you to think he's "crazy", I know nothing about the guy.


I can see why someone such as yourself finds the politics of open source so disorienting. The sheer indignity of having to consider an issue any deeper than how someone looks*, gosh, it must be so dizzying. Lucky for you there's people like Lunduke to distill it all down in the form of regular YouTube sermons to spare you the inconvenience of thinking for yourself.


Why does politics have anything to do with writing code? There's no politics assigned to designing comfortable screwdriver handles.

bent wrote:

* I know it's about more than the haircut for you, I'm not stupid and I've got you worked out. But if all you're prepared to put to words is vague allusions, you're just being a coward.


Danger hair points to extreme left wing weirdo narcissist activist messing everything they can touch up for everybody else. The instant I read that code of conduct threat I knew exactly the type of person who made it. I then discovered they look a lot like I imagined they would. Is that clear enough to fit your personal concept of bravery? Probably not, it wasn't stunning. I must try harder.

This sort of crap is exactly why codes of conduct exist, not to address it but to facillitate it.

bent wrote:
To say nothing of the actual fork, Alpine (et al.) want to keep people like you - who clearly hate them anyway - out of their communities, to stop their discussion boards filling with Facebook-esque garbage, such as your contributions in this thread. You might (pretend to) not see why, but they do, and I do too. You don't care whether Alpine adopt Xlibre or not, you're not going to use their distro anyway. For you, it's just more fuel for some weird persecution complex.


You clearly have a very high opinion of yourself.

Thanks for the free therapy session. You're either hugely generous or determinedly anti-capitalist. Either way thanks. Do you do struggle sessions? Asking for a friend.

I don't acually hate anyone other than Tony Blair and one ex boss.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hu
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 23629

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 2:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Following up on Ariadne specifically, that user was quoted in LWN (original post on Mastodon (JavaScript required, unfortunately)) describing the situation in a bit more detail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 6335
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 3:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From one of Hu's links

Quote:
Just because someone says they are maintaining an X.org fork, doesn't mean the X.org fork is maintained well enough to switch a distro to it.
— David Airlie


100% agree on this, especially when they are still in the remodeling phase (early demolition from what I can tell)

Even at that, I wish Xlibre well, I'm not just going to hold my breath expecting a good end result.
_________________
UM780, 6.14 zen kernel, gcc 13, openrc, wayland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sMueggli
l33t
l33t


Joined: 03 Sep 2022
Posts: 624

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 3:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hu wrote:
I am inclined to grant some benefit of the doubt when dealing with IRC logs, since people may write things more freely in realtime chat than they would in a forum post where they have time to think, review, and rewrite before sharing. Even so, there was a line that I felt was excessive:
https://irclogs.alpinelinux.org/%23alpine-devel-2025-06.log wrote:
2025-06-20 17:42:23 <Ariadne> let me be more direct: if anyone merges xlibre i will be pursuing a code of conduct violation against them


After reading the CoC of Alpine (https://www.alpinelinux.org/community/code-of-conduct.html) it looks like Ariadne cannot pursue a code of conduct violation, because the CoC does not forbid merging xlibre. And the CoC is indeed forbidding quite a lot to contribute "to an open [sic], [...] and healthy community".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
krumpf
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 15 Jul 2018
Posts: 240

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 6:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Despite being abandoned and unmaintained, old Xorg is getting an update https://www.phoronix.com/news/X.Org-GLAMOR-Zink-DMA-BUF
_________________
Dragon Princess Music Games Heroes and villains
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stefan11111
l33t
l33t


Joined: 29 Jan 2023
Posts: 989
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyone know why this patch was added to the xorg-server ebuild in ::gentoo: https://github.com/X11Libre/ports-gentoo/blob/master/x11-base/xlibre-server/files/xlibre-server-1.12-unloadsubmodule.patch ?
It was added in this commit, with seemingly no explanation: https://github.com/stefan11111/historical-gentoo/commit/1c488a2e22545bc75a71fa13473a22c436311384#diff-54386a5e4ae39684780b9897e000a138914db58fa67451593482bb4fe4f658e5 .
_________________
My overlay: https://github.com/stefan11111/stefan_overlay
INSTALL_MASK="/etc/systemd /lib/systemd /usr/lib/systemd /usr/lib/modules-load.d *udev* /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d *tmpfiles* /var/lib/dbus /usr/bin/gdbus /lib/udev"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 6335
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seriously?

Wouldn't that be a question for ... I don't know, the xlibre people on github
_________________
UM780, 6.14 zen kernel, gcc 13, openrc, wayland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stefan11111
l33t
l33t


Joined: 29 Jan 2023
Posts: 989
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anon-E-moose wrote:
Seriously?

Wouldn't that be a question for ... I don't know, the xlibre people on github

It's a patch from gentoo, which is still in the gentoo repo.
Perhaps one of the gentoo devs knows why it was added, or why it's still there.
_________________
My overlay: https://github.com/stefan11111/stefan_overlay
INSTALL_MASK="/etc/systemd /lib/systemd /usr/lib/systemd /usr/lib/modules-load.d *udev* /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d *tmpfiles* /var/lib/dbus /usr/bin/gdbus /lib/udev"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zucca
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Posts: 4197
Location: Rasi, Finland

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

krumpf wrote:
Despite being abandoned and unmaintained, old Xorg is getting an update https://www.phoronix.com/news/X.Org-GLAMOR-Zink-DMA-BUF
That update probably isn't going to land on xorg X11 (master branch), but to XWayland.
Xlibre, however seemed to merge that one already, if the comments under that article are to believed.
_________________
..: Zucca :..

My gentoo installs:
init=/sbin/openrc-init
-systemd -logind -elogind seatd

Quote:
I am NaN! I am a man!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chiitoo
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 2808
Location: Here and Away Again

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stefan11111 wrote:
Anyone know why this patch was added to the xorg-server ebuild in ::gentoo: https://github.com/X11Libre/ports-gentoo/blob/master/x11-base/xlibre-server/files/xlibre-server-1.12-unloadsubmodule.patch ?
It was added in this commit, with seemingly no explanation: https://github.com/stefan11111/historical-gentoo/commit/1c488a2e22545bc75a71fa13473a22c436311384#diff-54386a5e4ae39684780b9897e000a138914db58fa67451593482bb4fe4f658e5 .

Don't know about today, but this seems to be the origin here:

Quote:
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn gentoo-dev 2013-01-09 23:55:43 EET
Created attachment 335002 [details, diff]
unloadsubmodule.patch

Patch that fixes X server hang on startup on ia64.

https://bugs.gentoo.org/447152#c12
_________________
Kindest of regardses.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 6335
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 8:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stefan11111 wrote:
Anon-E-moose wrote:
Seriously?

Wouldn't that be a question for ... I don't know, the xlibre people on github

It's a patch from gentoo, which is still in the gentoo repo.
Perhaps one of the gentoo devs knows why it was added, or why it's still there.


But why would gentoo know why xlibre took the patch and applied it.

Maybe he has an old ia64 machine? *shrugs*
_________________
UM780, 6.14 zen kernel, gcc 13, openrc, wayland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mrbassie
l33t
l33t


Joined: 31 May 2013
Posts: 855
Location: Go past the sign for cope, right at the sign for seethe. If you see the target you've missed it.

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 8:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So anyway;

@asturm: what do you see?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pietinger
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 5869
Location: Bavaria

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 8:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A not so friendly conclusion by the moderation:

If a post no longer appears in the thread (because it was moved to dustbin), the thread creator can respond to it in several ways:

1. he asks in a friendly and polite way what was wrong with the post, or
2. he knows that the post was wrong and stops writing such posts, or
3. he doesn't care and thinks he can write whatever he wants.

I have to realize that number 1 and 2 do not apply ... but number 3.

Since my colleague @Banana has already posted a reminder in this thread, I will lock this thread for 24 hours. Users who miss a post should take note of this notice:

In the case of number 3, moderation will take action.


[Edit 2025-06-04] ... and unlocked again ... for discussions related to the thread title.

If anyone feels provoked, it is advisable to ignore it, because complete disregard is usually the hardest thing for a provocateur to bear ... it could also lead to an escalation, which is of course undesirable (and would have to be prevented by the moderation team).

_________________
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Pietinger
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stefan11111
l33t
l33t


Joined: 29 Jan 2023
Posts: 989
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chiitoo wrote:
stefan11111 wrote:
Anyone know why this patch was added to the xorg-server ebuild in ::gentoo: https://github.com/X11Libre/ports-gentoo/blob/master/x11-base/xlibre-server/files/xlibre-server-1.12-unloadsubmodule.patch ?
It was added in this commit, with seemingly no explanation: https://github.com/stefan11111/historical-gentoo/commit/1c488a2e22545bc75a71fa13473a22c436311384#diff-54386a5e4ae39684780b9897e000a138914db58fa67451593482bb4fe4f658e5 .

Don't know about today, but this seems to be the origin here:

Quote:
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn gentoo-dev 2013-01-09 23:55:43 EET
Created attachment 335002 [details, diff]
unloadsubmodule.patch

Patch that fixes X server hang on startup on ia64.

https://bugs.gentoo.org/447152#c12

thanks
_________________
My overlay: https://github.com/stefan11111/stefan_overlay
INSTALL_MASK="/etc/systemd /lib/systemd /usr/lib/systemd /usr/lib/modules-load.d *udev* /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d *tmpfiles* /var/lib/dbus /usr/bin/gdbus /lib/udev"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GDH-gentoo
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 20 Jul 2019
Posts: 1924
Location: South America

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 9:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

logrusx wrote:
Just leaving that here: https://github.com/kaniini/wayback

So, this can only work as a replacement if the combination of a Wayland compositor + rootful Xwayland (if I understand correctly, so that a separate X11 window manager can be run) is fully equivalent to a real X server? Can it be equivalent?
_________________
NeddySeagoon wrote:
I'm not a witch, I'm a retired electronics engineer :)
Ionen wrote:
As a packager I just don't want things to get messier with weird build systems and multiple toolchains requirements though :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stefan11111
l33t
l33t


Joined: 29 Jan 2023
Posts: 989
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 10:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GDH-gentoo wrote:
logrusx wrote:
Just leaving that here: https://github.com/kaniini/wayback

So, this can only work as a replacement if the combination of a Wayland compositor + rootful Xwayland (if I understand correctly, so that a separate X11 window manager can be run) is fully equivalent to a real X server? Can it be equivalent?

It can be used as a real X server, because it uses a real X server, Xwayland.
The way I understand it, wayback is the wayland compositor, which deals with hardware-specific stuff, and Xwayland just outputs to the wayland output from wayback.
As I said in another post it this thread, I see no advantage with doing this, while I see a lot of disadvantages.
I suspect it will have trouble with drivers that don't use drm, so it will be less versatile that other X servers, and I also suspect this will be slower that a pure X server on the hardware where it does run.
_________________
My overlay: https://github.com/stefan11111/stefan_overlay
INSTALL_MASK="/etc/systemd /lib/systemd /usr/lib/systemd /usr/lib/modules-load.d *udev* /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d *tmpfiles* /var/lib/dbus /usr/bin/gdbus /lib/udev"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GDH-gentoo
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 20 Jul 2019
Posts: 1924
Location: South America

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2025 3:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stefan11111 wrote:
The way I understand it, wayback is the wayland compositor, which deals with hardware-specific stuff, and Xwayland just outputs to the wayland output from wayback.

There isn't much documentation, but judging from the single C source file, technically it seems to be indeed a Wayland compositor based on TinyWL, so I suppose that yes, Xwayland talks to the compositor, and the compositor manages hardware the Wayland way, but:
  1. This compositor doesn't really expect to talk to native Wayland applications, only to Xwayland. So it can get away with minimal 'Waylanding' (using wlroots).
  2. It spawns Xwayland in rootful mode (and full screen), instead of rootless mode (Xwayland -rootless) like a typical (?) compositor.

_________________
NeddySeagoon wrote:
I'm not a witch, I'm a retired electronics engineer :)
Ionen wrote:
As a packager I just don't want things to get messier with weird build systems and multiple toolchains requirements though :)


Last edited by GDH-gentoo on Sat Jul 05, 2025 12:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sMueggli
l33t
l33t


Joined: 03 Sep 2022
Posts: 624

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2025 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stefan11111 wrote:
I suspect it will have trouble with drivers that don't use drm, so it will be less versatile that other X servers,


Which hardware is affected by this?

stefan11111 wrote:
and I also suspect this will be slower that a pure X server on the hardware where it does run.


How would you measure the "speed"?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stefan11111
l33t
l33t


Joined: 29 Jan 2023
Posts: 989
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2025 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sMueggli wrote:
stefan11111 wrote:
I suspect it will have trouble with drivers that don't use drm, so it will be less versatile that other X servers,


Which hardware is affected by this?

My guess is everything that doesn't use drmkms, so nvidia, fbdev and vesa, and probably others.
On my laptop with an intel iGPU/nvidia dGPU, I've had a lot of problems using modesetting.
I switched to xf86-video-intel, and everything worked.
I suspect things like this will cause problems on wayback.

Quote:

stefan11111 wrote:
and I also suspect this will be slower that a pure X server on the hardware where it does run.

How would you measure the "speed"?

For example, fire up a game and measure fps.
Or open a youtube video and see if it plays right.

I keep saying 'I suspect' because I never tried wayback.
_________________
My overlay: https://github.com/stefan11111/stefan_overlay
INSTALL_MASK="/etc/systemd /lib/systemd /usr/lib/systemd /usr/lib/modules-load.d *udev* /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d *tmpfiles* /var/lib/dbus /usr/bin/gdbus /lib/udev"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sMueggli
l33t
l33t


Joined: 03 Sep 2022
Posts: 624

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2025 5:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stefan11111 wrote:
sMueggli wrote:
stefan11111 wrote:
I suspect it will have trouble with drivers that don't use drm, so it will be less versatile that other X servers,


Which hardware is affected by this?

My guess is everything that doesn't use drmkms, so nvidia, fbdev and vesa, and probably others.
On my laptop with an intel iGPU/nvidia dGPU, I've had a lot of problems using modesetting.
I switched to xf86-video-intel, and everything worked.
I suspect things like this will cause problems on wayback.


Ok, Nvidia might indeed create problems. But that seems normal on Linux.

I doubt that anyone uses fbdev (or vesa) after the kernel is loaded for a desktop system.

And xf86-video-intel is only 2D.

stefan11111 wrote:

Quote:

stefan11111 wrote:
and I also suspect this will be slower that a pure X server on the hardware where it does run.

How would you measure the "speed"?

For example, fire up a game and measure fps.
Or open a youtube video and see if it plays right.

I keep saying 'I suspect' because I never tried wayback.


Yes, you can measure the FPS. And I guess wayback is able to produce 60 FPS. But only a test will show.

But I do not think that "seeing a video" is a good way to measure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zucca
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Posts: 4197
Location: Rasi, Finland

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 9:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Meanwhile at xorg/freedesktop: wayback moved under freedesktop gitlab.
README.md wrote:
It is intended to eventually replace the classic X.Org server, thus reducing
maintenance burden of X11 applications, but a lot of work needs to be done first.
... so it looks like xorg/freedesktop will stop supporting the X11/xorg server a little bit sooner. But at least they keep backwards compatibility to full X11 DEs... via wayland, but still better than nothing.

Time to wait how things progress...
_________________
..: Zucca :..

My gentoo installs:
init=/sbin/openrc-init
-systemd -logind -elogind seatd

Quote:
I am NaN! I am a man!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sMueggli
l33t
l33t


Joined: 03 Sep 2022
Posts: 624

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zucca wrote:

README.md wrote:
It is intended to eventually replace the classic X.Org server, thus reducing
maintenance burden of X11 applications, but a lot of work needs to be done first.
... so it looks like xorg/freedesktop will stop supporting the X11/xorg server a little bit sooner.


Aren't you over-interpreting too much?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 6335
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From wayback's README

Quote:
Wayback is a X11 compatibility layer which allows for running full X11 desktop environments using Wayland components. It is essentially a stub compositor which provides just enough Wayland capabilities to host a rootful Xwayland server.

It is intended to eventually replace the classic X.Org server, thus reducing maintenance burden of X11 applications, but a lot of work needs to be done first.

Wayback is an experimental state: expect breaking changes, and lots of bugs.


It's a WIP, nowhere near ready to retire the Xorg server, this is for future proofing for those who need X whatever the reason.
_________________
UM780, 6.14 zen kernel, gcc 13, openrc, wayland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zucca
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Posts: 4197
Location: Rasi, Finland

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sMueggli wrote:
Aren't you over-interpreting too much?
Yeah, I might.
My point is that, when this wayback is in acceptable level of stability and fuctionality, freedesktop has no reason to touch xorg-server code at all.

But who knows if this happens even sooner if XLibre gets their things sorted out.

I, for one, would be interested test out Xlibre if/when they get to clean up the code.
_________________
..: Zucca :..

My gentoo installs:
init=/sbin/openrc-init
-systemd -logind -elogind seatd

Quote:
I am NaN! I am a man!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Page 7 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum