| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hanj
Veteran
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Posts: 1496
|
 Posted: Fri May 24, 2024 2:36 pm Post subject: Unable to boot because of libreadline.so.8 |
 |
|
We recently had a long power outage and one of our servers is not rebooting. I first was suspecting a bad drive due to Read-only file system messages, but paging up in the output I think I see the real issue.
| Code: | Run /sbin/init as init process
INIT: version 3.09 booting
/bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
|
From here mkdir calls are failing with Read-only file system
I did a fsck on these partitions and no corruptions were found.
Can anyone help?
Thanks!
hanji
_________________
Server Admin Blog - Uno-Code.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GDH-gentoo
Veteran
Joined: 20 Jul 2019
Posts: 1569
Location: South America
|
| Posted: Fri May 24, 2024 2:58 pm Post subject: Re: Unable to boot because of libreadline.so.8 |
|
|
| hanj wrote: | | Code: | | /bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory |
|
Well, that's pretty descriptive, is libreadline (still) there?
| Code: | | $ ls -F /{,usr/}lib*/libreadline* |
_________________
| NeddySeagoon wrote: | I'm not a witch, I'm a retired electronics engineer  |
| Ionen wrote: | | As a packager I just don't want things to get messier with weird build systems and multiple toolchains requirements though |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hu
Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 21918
|
| Posted: Fri May 24, 2024 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Also, does this system use a separate /usr, and if so, is that /usr mounted soon enough? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hanj
Veteran
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Posts: 1496
|
| Posted: Fri May 24, 2024 3:25 pm Post subject: Re: Unable to boot because of libreadline.so.8 |
|
|
| GDH-gentoo wrote: | | hanj wrote: | | Code: | | /bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory |
|
Well, that's pretty descriptive, is libreadline (still) there?
| Code: | | $ ls -F /{,usr/}lib*/libreadline* |
|
I'm in via LiveCD.
| Code: | /usr/lib/libreadline.so
/usr/lib/libreadline.so.8
/usr/lib/libreadline.so.8.1 |
Thanks
hanji
_________________
Server Admin Blog - Uno-Code.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hanj
Veteran
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Posts: 1496
|
| Posted: Fri May 24, 2024 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hu wrote: | | Also, does this system use a separate /usr, and if so, is that /usr mounted soon enough? |
I do have a separate partition for /usr. Unsure about the mounting time. Is there a way to determine that?
Thanks
hanji
_________________
Server Admin Blog - Uno-Code.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hanj
Veteran
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Posts: 1496
|
| Posted: Fri May 24, 2024 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hu wrote: | | Also, does this system use a separate /usr, and if so, is that /usr mounted soon enough? |
I think you might be onto something. I see sda3 mounting which is /root, and the failure happens right after. So sda6 /usr doesn't seem to be mounted.
Thanks
hanji
_________________
Server Admin Blog - Uno-Code.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hu
Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 21918
|
| Posted: Fri May 24, 2024 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If you mount /usr via initramfs, that should be fine. If you don't, that likely explains your problem. It looks like older libreadline was installed in /lib, and so could work without the initramfs mount. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hanj
Veteran
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Posts: 1496
|
| Posted: Fri May 24, 2024 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hu wrote: | | If you mount /usr via initramfs, that should be fine. If you don't, that likely explains your problem. It looks like older libreadline was installed in /lib, and so could work without the initramfs mount. |
I don't think I use initramfs.. this is an ancient kernel too. Sorry for my ignorance on this, but how can I see if I'm using initramfs? Also, would copying those libs to /libs work to get things booting again?
Thanks!
hanji
_________________
Server Admin Blog - Uno-Code.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hanj
Veteran
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Posts: 1496
|
| Posted: Fri May 24, 2024 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hu wrote: | | If you mount /usr via initramfs, that should be fine. If you don't, that likely explains your problem. It looks like older libreadline was installed in /lib, and so could work without the initramfs mount. |
Okay, it's definitely related to that. I just did a test by copying libreadline* to /lib and now it's failing on libmount. Any ideas to properly handle this?
Thanks!
hanji
_________________
Server Admin Blog - Uno-Code.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hu
Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 21918
|
| Posted: Fri May 24, 2024 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think the proper solution is to read and implement the changes from 2024-01-05: Separate /usr now requires an initramfs. As an emergency measure, you could keep copying files from /usr/lib into /lib, and make plans to undo all that later. If you have the free space for it, you could make a directory /usr/lib on / and mirror /usr/lib into it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GDH-gentoo
Veteran
Joined: 20 Jul 2019
Posts: 1569
Location: South America
|
| Posted: Fri May 24, 2024 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| hanj wrote: | | Sorry for my ignorance on this, but how can I see if I'm using initramfs? |
Check your bootloader configuration. /boot/grub/grub.cfg if you are using GRUB, for example.
Indeed, it is. Separate /usr and no initramfs has been unsupported by Gentoo since 2013 or something. But until recently, Gentoo also took measures to not actively break this setup either for the cases where it could still work (for example, by having ebuilds install selected libraries in /lib instead of /usr/lib)
What changed is that Gentoo has decided to not care anymore, so the news item was reissued, as an "OK, users, last chance" sort of warning.
_________________
| NeddySeagoon wrote: | | I'm not a witch, I'm a retired electronics engineer |
| Ionen wrote: | | As a packager I just don't want things to get messier with weird build systems and multiple toolchains requirements though |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pietinger
Moderator
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 4437
Location: Bavaria
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Networking & Security
