Benchmarking ut2k4 demo

lamer0 · n00b Joined: 31 Mar 2003 Posts: 29

Save benchmark.sh into ut2004demo/Benchmark dir.

the lone crouton · Tux's lil' helper Joined: 11 Aug 2003 Posts: 119

19.296822 / 54.756439 / 169.507797 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 54.284588

XP2600/512MBpc2700/GF4Ti4200/2.4.20-gaming-sources/43.63 drivers

himpierre · l33t Joined: 31 Aug 2002 Posts: 867 Location: Berlin

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86-64 Linux
Unknown processor @ 2003 MHz
GeForce FX 5900/AGP/SSE2

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchma
rk -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini-exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

28.596342 / 78.571991 / 173.701935 fps rand[1049344192]
Score = 73.384811

grover · Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:04 pm Post subject:

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2169 MHz
GeForce4 Ti 4200/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

17.729950 / 56.111809 / 151.388306 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 55.516609

Swift · n00b Joined: 09 Jun 2002 Posts: 51

the benchmark excites with:
Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0".

the game itself runs without any problem...
anyone knows how to fix?

blackhole · n00b Joined: 14 Sep 2003 Posts: 18

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1804 MHz
RADEON 9700 PRO x86/MMX/3DNow!/SSE

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchma
rk -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

2.615759 / 14.122698 / 53.081150 fps rand[823438765]
Score = 14.126121

i'm also getting the Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0". error,

is that kind of performance normal with ati drivers (i'm using 3.70) or is something wrong with my system?

trINItr0n_ · Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 3:25 pm Post subject:

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2071 MHz
GeForce4 Ti 4200/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

14.166430 / 41.299141 / 150.046814 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 41.066727

running 2.6.2-gentoo-r1/512 ram/amd barton 2500 @ 166x12.5

windsok · n00b Joined: 20 Oct 2003 Posts: 14

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1545 MHz
GeForce2 GTS/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

11.040814 / 36.640057 / 105.341064 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 36.634865

slackware-current (2.4.24)
Athlon XP 1800+
512MB DDR DRAM
Geforce 2 GTS 64MB

Uranus · Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 4:39 pm Post subject:

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1400 MHz
GeForce2 GTS/AGP/3DNOW!

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

6.825200 / 24.210106 / 90.555168 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 24.213776

zakk · l33t Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 614 Location: Oakland, CA

(l)user · Guru Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 334 Location: Poland

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1394 MHz
GeForce2 GTS/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

10.063552 / 26.078394 / 68.335289 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 26.082407

athlon xp 1600+
Geforce 2 GTS 64 mb ddr
512 ram ddr (266)
_________________
Registered Linux user #302020
Gadu Gadu #490092

mailportugal · n00b Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 7

Linux xxx 2.4.22-gentoo-r2 #1 Qua Dez 24 22:38:34 WET 2003 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
nvidia-kernel-1.0.4496-r3

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
GenuineIntel Unknown processor @ 2406 MHz
GeForce4 Ti 4400/AGP/SSE2

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

10.190522 / 49.977371 / 142.187653 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 49.710190

sgaap · Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:34 pm Post subject:

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1667 MHz
GeForce FX 5900/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!
dm-rankin
4.520851 / 21.064482 / 71.450638 fps rand[1814308868]

Score = 21.062794

agp: nvagp @ 2x
nvidia driver: 1.0.5336
chipset: kt133a
memory: 384mb pc133@133
amd xp 2000+@1666mhz

Maybe its time to upgrade my mobo and mem

_________________
In "old" Europe we already have a word for "pre-emptive strikes" mr Bush: its called "war"

edave · n00b Joined: 28 Sep 2003 Posts: 9

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1830 MHz
GeForce2 GTS/PCI/SSE/3DNOW!

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

10.913903 / 23.713099 / 125.413025 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 23.692850

Wedge_ · Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 11:13 pm Post subject:

MNKyDeth · n00b Joined: 13 Dec 2003 Posts: 36

I get that Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0". error also. It happens everytime in the sameplace in the benchmark. When the guy runs up the wooden sloped plank and fires 2 maybe 3 rockets.

I been looking for a fix cause I really wanted to see what my system could do in it.
A64 3400+
Chaintech ZNF3-150
1gig Corsair Pc3200LL XMS
GFFX 5900se
SB Audigy2zs

BTW, I have tried all nvidia drivers from 4496 on up to 5336. None of them fixed the problem from what I could see.

DarrenM · Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 12:40 am Post subject:

If anyone is dual booting 64 and 32 bit installs I'd love to see the performance from both systems. I know the 64 bit isn't supposed to be all that optimised but it'd still be interesting to see.

zakk · l33t Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 614 Location: Oakland, CA

ashtray · n00b Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 8

I get the same thing on Radeon 9600 Pro with drivers 3.2.8 and 3.7.0 kernel 2.4.22.

crazycat · Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 5:58 am Post subject:

I've got it on my amd64 3000+, 1024MB@166 running 64 bit version of ut2k4

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86-64 Linux
Unknown processor @ 2010 MHz
GeForce4 Ti 4200/AGP/SSE2

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -in$

33.064117 / 86.589905 / 182.003525 fps rand[904465829]
Score = 76.442833

It is strange , i get even more score than a guy with a same cpu but fx5900 instead.

himpierre · l33t Joined: 31 Aug 2002 Posts: 867 Location: Berlin

lamer0 · n00b Joined: 31 Mar 2003 Posts: 29

thanks for all the replies. Seems ut2k4 is very cpu dependant. Interesting.

crazycat · Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:29 am Post subject:

And that means i can still live with my beloved ti4200 for a year or two

btw , does anyone know how to overclock geforce on amd64? nvclock is now working and i get nice 300/600 compared to original 250/513 in windows.

cduchesne · n00b Joined: 21 Apr 2003 Posts: 14

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AMD Athlon64 3200+ (2000.043 Mhz)
Corsair 1 GB PC3200 (CAS 2-3-3)
GeForce FX 5900XT (driver v. 5336)

26.773998 / 78.098778 / 235.808655 fps -- rand[1814308868]

Score = 70.436974
_________________
WX
MSI K8T Neo
Athlon64 3200+
GF4 Ti4400
1024 MB PC3200
Gentoo 1.4

trINItr0n_ · Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:41 am Post subject:

thanks for mentioning nvclock, looks very handy ... but got strange results in this test: overclocked my Gainward ti4200 (very good overclocker) from a default 250MHz/444MHz to 310MHz/550MHz, and i actually get worse results

Under windows with these settings it gives quite an impressive boost, but linux seems not to like it tho

Any ideas about this ?