View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Hu Moderator
Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 21607
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2021 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think some versions of Windows have the ability to automatically wake the system so that Windows Update can run. Perhaps the system was in S3 when OP walked out the door, woke itself later to run some updates, then went back to sleep before he could get home to see it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
eccerr0r Watchman
Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 9677 Location: almost Mile High in the USA
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2021 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually I think anything with standard ATX supplies fail the "Modern Standby" requirement because PG itself takes that 500ms. Clearly anything that takes HDDs will fail the requirement too.
So this is only good for custom PCs/tablets that supplies power all the time (and stays quiet so you can't tell it's always powered - no fans so there's a limit to power consumption to begin with) and have no expansion slots (usb excepted)... _________________ Intel Core i7 2700K/Radeon R7 250/24GB DDR3/256GB SSD
What am I supposed watching? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
At least some laptops support it, but I didn't notice or look for details.
It makes sense why that would be useful for mobile devices. Other factors aside, i can understand the "benefit" in being able to talk to the computer to wake it up so that it can search or perform some kind of task. Less understandable is preventing users from choosing traditional standby and off modes. _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dmpogo Advocate
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 3267 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hu wrote: | I think some versions of Windows have the ability to automatically wake the system so that Windows Update can run. Perhaps the system was in S3 when OP walked out the door, woke itself later to run some updates, then went back to sleep before he could get home to see it. |
I would imagine you can have something waking the system on a timer (as opposite from outside signal), check for updates, and put it back to sleep ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hu Moderator
Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 21607
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, that is what I posited above. Windows Update would schedule a timer to wake the system, usually (but not necessarily) in the middle of the night. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eccerr0r Watchman
Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 9677 Location: almost Mile High in the USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This high speed suspend/resume completely nullifies need for S3. However hibernate is still useful for these machines.
For a traditional ACPI machine, Windows already does use the timer when a computer's on battery and S3, it will check the battery occasionally and hibernate if the battery is going low. It may use that time to check for updates depending on battery/AC power status.
As far as I know Linux DEs do not do the battery paranoia check, seems like a good idea. _________________ Intel Core i7 2700K/Radeon R7 250/24GB DDR3/256GB SSD
What am I supposed watching? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eccerr0r wrote: | This high speed suspend/resume completely nullifies need for S3. | That depends on whether or not you want the computer to resume on its own. I would never want that function enabled. Note that I consider this different than an option to resume after WoL. Basically, I don't want the OS activating its River Tam to perform updates or some other unwanted activity. _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eccerr0r Watchman
Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 9677 Location: almost Mile High in the USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
pjp wrote: | That depends on whether or not you want the computer to resume on its own. |
This is a software problem, not a hardware problem. As said, the capability for "Modern Standby" is a superset of S3 - does everything S3 does except faster - other than the issue that unsupported devices are out in the cold even if they can be soft suspended by copying state and reprogramming the device (unless if it can be reprogrammed in milliseconds).
In any case, Windows already can program your RTC to resume from S3 on its own, so the point is moot. _________________ Intel Core i7 2700K/Radeon R7 250/24GB DDR3/256GB SSD
What am I supposed watching? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zucca Moderator
Joined: 14 Jun 2007 Posts: 3339 Location: Rasi, Finland
|
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eccerr0r wrote: | Windows already can program your RTC to resume from S3 on its own | Linux too. "suspend-then-hibernate" uses that, afaik. _________________ ..: Zucca :..
Gentoo IRC channels reside on Libera.Chat.
--
Quote: | I am NaN! I am a man! |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|