Forums

Skip to content

Advanced search
  • Quick links
    • Unanswered topics
    • Active topics
    • Search
  • FAQ
  • Login
  • Register
  • Board index Assistance Kernel & Hardware
  • Search

Advices/opinions needed - hard drive failing?

Kernel not recognizing your hardware? Problems with power management or PCMCIA? What hardware is compatible with Gentoo? See here. (Only for kernels supported by Gentoo.)
Post Reply
Advanced search
17 posts • Page 1 of 1
Author
Message
Zucca
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar
Posts: 4706
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:31 pm
Location: Rasi, Finland
Contact:
Contact Zucca
Website

Advices/opinions needed - hard drive failing?

  • Quote

Post by Zucca » Mon Mar 01, 2021 3:41 pm

I ran SMART extended/long tests and one of my drives started to look worrying...

Code: Select all

# /usr/sbin/skdump /dev/sda
Device: sat12:/dev/sda
Type: 12 Byte SCSI ATA SAT Passthru
Size: 1907729 MiB
Model: [WDC WD20EARX-008FB0]
Serial: [WD-WCAZAK774726]
Firmware: [51.0AB51]
SMART Available: yes
Quirks:
Awake: yes
SMART Disk Health Good: yes
Off-line Data Collection Status: [Off-line data collection activity was completed without error.]
Total Time To Complete Off-Line Data Collection: 30060 s
Self-Test Execution Status: [The previous self-test routine completed without error or no self-test has ever been run.]
Percent Self-Test Remaining: 0%
Conveyance Self-Test Available: yes
Short/Extended Self-Test Available: yes
Start Self-Test Available: yes
Abort Self-Test Available: yes
Short Self-Test Polling Time: 2 min
Extended Self-Test Polling Time: 324 min
Conveyance Self-Test Polling Time: 5 min
Bad Sectors: 3 sectors
Powered On: 7.1 years
Power Cycles: 173
Average Powered On Per Power Cycle: 15.0 days
Temperature: 41.0 C
Attribute Parsing Verification: Good
Overall Status: BAD_SECTOR
ID# Name                        Value Worst Thres Pretty      Raw            Type    Updates Good Good/Past
  1 raw-read-error-rate         200   200    51   17          0x110000000000 prefail online  yes  yes
  3 spin-up-time                183   182    21   5.8 s       0xda1600000000 prefail online  yes  yes
  4 start-stop-count            100   100     0   189         0xbd0000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a
  5 reallocated-sector-count    200   200   140   3 sectors   0x030000000000 prefail online  yes  yes
  7 seek-error-rate             200   200     0   0           0x000000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a
  9 power-on-hours               15    15     0   7.1 years   0xd9f200000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a
 10 spin-retry-count            100   100     0   0           0x000000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a
 11 calibration-retry-count     100   100     0   0           0x000000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a
 12 power-cycle-count           100   100     0   173         0xad0000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a
192 power-off-retract-count     200   200     0   68          0x440000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a
193 load-cycle-count            200   200     0   124         0x7c0000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a
194 temperature-celsius-2       109    96     0   41.0 C      0x290000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a
196 reallocated-event-count     197   197     0   3           0x030000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a
197 current-pending-sector      200   200     0   0 sectors   0x000000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a
198 offline-uncorrectable       200   200     0   0 sectors   0x000000000000 old-age offline n/a  n/a
199 udma-crc-error-count        200   200     0   0           0x000000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a
200 multi-zone-error-rate       200   200     0   0           0x000000000000 old-age offline n/a  n/a
ID 5 looks worrying...
What is strange is

Code: Select all

# /usr/sbin/skdump --status /dev/sda
GOOD
Maybe libatasmart is too optimistic? :P
..: Zucca :..

Code: Select all

0100100100100000011000010110110100100000
0100111001100001010011100010000100100000
0100100100100000011000010110110100100000
0110000100100000011011010110000101101110
00100001
Top
Anon-E-moose
Watchman
Watchman
User avatar
Posts: 6566
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: Dallas area

  • Quote

Post by Anon-E-moose » Mon Mar 01, 2021 4:04 pm

all reallocated-sector-count tells you is it reallocated xyz # of sectors.

What would be a problem is if 197 and possibly 198 start having something more than zero.
UM780 xtx, 6.18 zen kernel, gcc 15, openrc, wayland
minixforum m1-s1 max -- same software as above but used for ai learning


Zealots are gonna be zealots, just like haters are gonna be haters
Top
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar
Posts: 56104
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 9:37 am
Location: 56N 3W

  • Quote

Post by NeddySeagoon » Mon Mar 01, 2021 4:43 pm

Zucca,

Code: Select all

197 current-pending-sector 
being non zero is a bad thing.
It means that the drive has bad sectors that it would like to remap but it can't as they are unreadable.
That is, the drive cannot read its own writing.

A non zero

Code: Select all

   5 reallocated-sector-count
is expected an a drive that's been in use for 7.1 years.
The drive is supposed to remap sectors that are difficult to read before reads fail. Its normal drive operation.

A sudden jump in the reallocated-sector-count should be an alarm signal.

Taken together with

Code: Select all

196 reallocated-event-count
the drive has had three remapping events oy one sector each.

That drive was OK at the time you asked it.
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Top
Zucca
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar
Posts: 4706
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:31 pm
Location: Rasi, Finland
Contact:
Contact Zucca
Website

  • Quote

Post by Zucca » Mon Mar 01, 2021 6:06 pm

Thanks guys.
It's one of five drives in my btrfs-raid1 (essentially raid5) drive pool/stack.
I'll see if I can convert the set into a one that can tolerate two drive failures.

I guess I'll ready my order for one spare... just in case. Besides I need few bigger drives if I'm going to have more redundancy.

But first I make sure my backups disks are working.
..: Zucca :..

Code: Select all

0100100100100000011000010110110100100000
0100111001100001010011100010000100100000
0100100100100000011000010110110100100000
0110000100100000011011010110000101101110
00100001
Top
AJM
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 7:46 pm
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

  • Quote

Post by AJM » Mon Mar 01, 2021 6:14 pm

Maybe I'm paranoid / wasteful, but I've always gone by the rule that if a drive has even one bad sector pending it goes in the bin. My experience has always been that if one sector has gone bad, others will almost inevitably follow and usually before too long...
Top
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar
Posts: 56104
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 9:37 am
Location: 56N 3W

  • Quote

Post by NeddySeagoon » Mon Mar 01, 2021 6:29 pm

AJM,

Pending means the drive is dead. That's grounds for a warranty return.
The relocation mechanism working properly is normal operation.

Indeed, new drives have relocated sectors but the counts are set to zero as part of final test.
That whey they always appear to be perfect.

Remapped sectors can be detected by a dip in the continuous read speed as the remapping causes extra seek time.
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Top
mike155
Advocate
Advocate
Posts: 4438
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 11:33 pm
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

  • Quote

Post by mike155 » Mon Mar 01, 2021 6:31 pm

Please don't forget that the meaning of the SMART values varies between vendors and even between product series of the same vendor. SMART data is NOT standardized.
Top
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar
Posts: 56104
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 9:37 am
Location: 56N 3W

  • Quote

Post by NeddySeagoon » Mon Mar 01, 2021 6:48 pm

mike155,

Correct but it is normalised for display.

When anf parameters Value or Worst is equal to or lower than Threh, that parameter has failed.
In the case of the reallocated-event-count, that logic is broken.

That is, SMART will report that a drive is OK, even when it has an unreadable sector that might prevent the system booting.
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Top
Buffoon
Veteran
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1369
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2015 2:22 pm
Location: EU or US

  • Quote

Post by Buffoon » Tue Mar 02, 2021 12:04 am

Is this drive OK? Just logged into Wife's puter and that's what she has. I've got that weird feeling ...

Code: Select all

Device: sat16:/dev/sda
Type: 16 Byte SCSI ATA SAT Passthru
Size: 152627 MiB
Model: [FUJITSU MJA2160BH G2]
Serial: [K96PTA125BWU]
Firmware: [0084001C]
SMART Available: yes
Quirks:
Awake: yes
SMART Disk Health Good: yes
Off-line Data Collection Status: [Off-line data collection activity was never started.]
Total Time To Complete Off-Line Data Collection: 508 s
Self-Test Execution Status: [The previous self-test routine completed without error or no self-test has ever been run.]
Percent Self-Test Remaining: 0%
Conveyance Self-Test Available: yes
Short/Extended Self-Test Available: yes
Start Self-Test Available: yes
Abort Self-Test Available: yes
Short Self-Test Polling Time: 2 min
Extended Self-Test Polling Time: 72 min
Conveyance Self-Test Polling Time: 2 min
Bad Sectors: 589834 sectors
Powered On: 5.8 years
Power Cycles: 982
Average Powered On Per Power Cycle: 2.2 days
Temperature: 36.0 C
Attribute Parsing Verification: Bad
Overall Status: BAD_SECTOR
ID# Name                        Value Worst Thres Pretty      Raw            Type    Updates Good Good/Past
  1 raw-read-error-rate         100   100    46   44021       0xf5ab00000000 prefail online  yes  yes 
  2 throughput-performance      100   100    30   n/a         0x000077010000 prefail offline yes  yes 
  3 spin-up-time                100   100    25   n/a         0x000000000000 prefail online  yes  yes 
  4 start-stop-count             99    99     0   2177        0x810800000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
  5 reallocated-sector-count    100   100    24   589834 sectors 0x0a000900c707 prefail online  yes  yes 
  7 seek-error-rate             100    54    47   988         0xdc0300000000 prefail online  yes  yes 
  8 seek-time-performance       100   100    19   n/a         0x000000000000 prefail offline yes  yes 
  9 power-on-hours                1     1     0   5.8 years   0xa0c600000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
 10 spin-retry-count            100   100    20   0           0x000000000000 prefail online  yes  yes 
 12 power-cycle-count           100   100     0   982         0xd60300000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
192 power-off-retract-count      99    99     0   379         0x7b0100000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
193 load-cycle-count             74    74     0   532917      0xb52108000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
194 temperature-celsius-2       100    15     0   36.0 C      0x240012004d00 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
195 hardware-ecc-recovered      100   100     0   220         0xdc0000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
196 reallocated-event-count     100   100     0   26798194698 0x0a004c3d0600 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
197 current-pending-sector      100    95     0   0 sectors   0x000000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
198 offline-uncorrectable        96    96     0   9 sectors   0x090000000000 old-age offline n/a  n/a 
199 udma-crc-error-count        200   253     0   1           0x010000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
200 multi-zone-error-rate       100   100    60   19071       0x7f4a00000000 prefail online  yes  yes 
203 run-out-cancel              100    99     0   n/a         0x9507e1f56401 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
240 head-flying-hours           200   200     0   n/a         0x000000000000 old-age online  n/a n/a
Life is a tragedy for those who feel and a comedy for those who think.
Top
figueroa
Advocate
Advocate
User avatar
Posts: 3032
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:15 pm
Location: Edge of marsh USA
Contact:
Contact figueroa
Website

  • Quote

Post by figueroa » Tue Mar 02, 2021 3:44 am

Buffoon wrote:Is this drive OK? Just logged into Wife's puter and that's what she has. I've got that weird feeling ...
As a minimum, I'd be watching this one closely, double checking state of backups (beware of perfect backups of corrupted data), and laying in a spare to have on-hand.
Andy Figueroa
hp pavilion hpe h8-1260t/2AB5; spinning rust x3
i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz; 16 gb; Radeon HD 7570
amd64/23.0/split-usr/desktop (stable), OpenRC, -systemd -pulseaudio -uefi -wayland
Top
figueroa
Advocate
Advocate
User avatar
Posts: 3032
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:15 pm
Location: Edge of marsh USA
Contact:
Contact figueroa
Website

  • Quote

Post by figueroa » Tue Mar 02, 2021 3:54 am

The drive here is the backup drive of a remote server, mainly NFS for other machines on the network to hold their backups. No reallocated sectors, but one pending and uncorrectable. Given the 10.1 year power-on hours, I'm planning to replace it.

Code: Select all

$ sudo /usr/sbin/skdump /dev/sdb
Password: 
Device: sat16:/dev/sdb
Type: 16 Byte SCSI ATA SAT Passthru
Size: 476940 MiB
Model: [WDC WD5000AAKS-00UU3A0]
Serial: [WD-WCAYU0555963]
Firmware: [01.03B01]
SMART Available: yes
Quirks:
Awake: yes
SMART Disk Health Good: yes
Off-line Data Collection Status: [Off-line data collection activity was completed without error.]
Total Time To Complete Off-Line Data Collection: 7980 s
Self-Test Execution Status: [The previous self-test routine completed without error or no self-test has ever been run.]
Percent Self-Test Remaining: 0%
Conveyance Self-Test Available: yes
Short/Extended Self-Test Available: yes
Start Self-Test Available: yes
Abort Self-Test Available: yes
Short Self-Test Polling Time: 2 min
Extended Self-Test Polling Time: 95 min
Conveyance Self-Test Polling Time: 5 min
Bad Sectors: 1 sectors
Powered On: 10.1 years
Power Cycles: 170
Average Powered On Per Power Cycle: 21.6 days
Temperature: 45.0 C
Attribute Parsing Verification: Good
Overall Status: BAD_SECTOR
ID# Name                        Value Worst Thres Pretty      Raw            Type    Updates Good Good/Past
  1 raw-read-error-rate         200   200    51   522         0x0a0200000000 prefail online  yes  yes 
  3 spin-up-time                156   138    21   3.2 s       0x560c00000000 prefail online  yes  yes 
  4 start-stop-count            100   100     0   172         0xac0000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
  5 reallocated-sector-count    200   200   140   0 sectors   0x000000000000 prefail online  yes  yes 
  7 seek-error-rate             200   200     0   0           0x000000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
  9 power-on-hours                1     1     0   10.1 years  0x4b5801000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
 10 spin-retry-count            100   100     0   0           0x000000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
 11 calibration-retry-count     100   100     0   0           0x000000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
 12 power-cycle-count           100   100     0   170         0xaa0000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
192 power-off-retract-count     200   200     0   141         0x8d0000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
193 load-cycle-count            200   200     0   30          0x1e0000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
194 temperature-celsius-2        98    77     0   45.0 C      0x2d0000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
196 reallocated-event-count     200   200     0   0           0x000000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
197 current-pending-sector      200   200     0   1 sectors   0x010000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
198 offline-uncorrectable       200   200     0   1 sectors   0x010000000000 old-age offline n/a  n/a 
199 udma-crc-error-count        200   200     0   14          0x0e0000000000 old-age online  n/a  n/a 
200 multi-zone-error-rate       200   200     0   10          0x0a0000000000 old-age offline n/a  n/a 
Andy Figueroa
hp pavilion hpe h8-1260t/2AB5; spinning rust x3
i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz; 16 gb; Radeon HD 7570
amd64/23.0/split-usr/desktop (stable), OpenRC, -systemd -pulseaudio -uefi -wayland
Top
lord_khelben
n00b
n00b
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2017 3:50 pm

  • Quote

Post by lord_khelben » Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:59 am

NeddySeagoon wrote:Zucca,

Code: Select all

197 current-pending-sector 
being non zero is a bad thing.
It means that the drive has bad sectors that it would like to remap but it can't as they are unreadable.
That is, the drive cannot read its own writing.
NeddySeagoon wrote:AJM,

Pending means the drive is dead. That's grounds for a warranty return.
Is Current Pending Sector that bad ?

I have seen quite a few cases of Current Pending Sector being non-zero because of a flaky cable or power loss during writing. For example the power loss occurred after writing the sector but before updating the internal checksum of the drive (or vice versa). This resulted in wrong checksum and the sector being reported as "not being able to be read" while there was no real problem in the disk surface. After using dd to write zeroes to that particular sector, CPS was lowered to zero again and everything worked correctly.
Top
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar
Posts: 56104
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 9:37 am
Location: 56N 3W

  • Quote

Post by NeddySeagoon » Tue Mar 02, 2021 5:12 pm

lord_khelben,

The SMART data only tells about what is happening inside the drive.

Only

Code: Select all

199 udma-crc-error-count 
can be a data cable problem.

When the 197 current-pending-sector count includes LBA 0, the partition table is unreadable, the kernel cannot find any filesystems on the drive.

The drive only finds out about unreadable sectors when it actually goes to read them.
That means that they always have your data in them.
When a sector fails on write, the write is remapped immediately, while that data is still in the write cache.
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Top
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar
Posts: 56104
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 9:37 am
Location: 56N 3W

  • Quote

Post by NeddySeagoon » Tue Mar 02, 2021 5:20 pm

figueroa

Code: Select all

197 current-pending-sector      200   200     0   1 sectors 
Some of your data is already gone. ddrescue may coax one more read.
What you have lost depends on what the sector holds.

A data block for a file. That's the best case.
A directory block. That's pretty bad. You data is still there, it can't be found by traversing the directory structure.
Maybe its a director block that contains other directories. You just lost access to a lot more data.
Is it a file system meta data block?
That's worse again.

It isn't going to get better.
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Top
eccerr0r
Watchman
Watchman
Posts: 10239
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: almost Mile High in the USA
Contact:
Contact eccerr0r
Website

  • Quote

Post by eccerr0r » Tue Mar 02, 2021 5:45 pm

Is this drive still good?

Code: Select all

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED!
Drive failure expected in less than 24 hours. SAVE ALL DATA.
See vendor-specific Attribute list for failed Attributes.

Code: Select all

  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   001   001   005    Pre-fail  Always   FAILING_NOW 30
  9 Power_On_Hours          0x0012   096   096   000    Old_age   Always       -       28864
197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0022   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
Because I've been using this drive for several months like this now ;-) (Hint: I'm not using this drive for anything valuable!!!)
Last edited by eccerr0r on Tue Mar 02, 2021 5:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Intel Core i7 2700K/Radeon Firepro W2100/24GB DDR3/800GB SSD
What am I supposed watching?
Top
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar
Posts: 56104
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 9:37 am
Location: 56N 3W

  • Quote

Post by NeddySeagoon » Tue Mar 02, 2021 5:51 pm

eccerr0r,

Code: Select all

 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   001   001   005
That's Value Worst Thresh, the parameter has failed as both Value and Worst are <= Thresh

197 Current_Pending_Sector is still zero. so you don't have any lost data yet.
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Top
eccerr0r
Watchman
Watchman
Posts: 10239
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: almost Mile High in the USA
Contact:
Contact eccerr0r
Website

  • Quote

Post by eccerr0r » Tue Mar 02, 2021 5:55 pm

Actually the pending sector list was >0 for a while but I was able to coax the drive to report a value of 0 and pass its selftest finally. Prior to the coaxing, it was reporting bad sectors and had problems reading sectors left and right.

But yeah already knew this drive has pretty much expired. Even BIOS with SMART support will hang on boot requiring manual interaction to allow boot with this drive attached - had to disable it so I can still squeeze the last few moments of life out of this disk...

... for the past few months...

----

Well that hard drive died, or is choking on bad sectors now. Wasn't unexpected of course, so no big deal.

Now this is the kicker for another hard drive. Actually, though it's hard, it's quite solid...

Code: Select all

ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  9 Power_On_Hours_and_Msec 0x0032   000   000   000    Old_age   Always       -       935604h+53m+50.010s
Surely this drive hasn't really been turned on for this many hours, otherwise it'd give the Centennial Bulb a run for its money... unfortunately this corrupted value probably kills the resale value of this drive despite still having 100% on its media wearout indicator (MLC)...
Intel Core i7 2700K/Radeon Firepro W2100/24GB DDR3/800GB SSD
What am I supposed watching?
Top
Post Reply

17 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to “Kernel & Hardware”

Jump to
  • Assistance
  • ↳   News & Announcements
  • ↳   Frequently Asked Questions
  • ↳   Installing Gentoo
  • ↳   Multimedia
  • ↳   Desktop Environments
  • ↳   Networking & Security
  • ↳   Kernel & Hardware
  • ↳   Portage & Programming
  • ↳   Gamers & Players
  • ↳   Other Things Gentoo
  • ↳   Unsupported Software
  • Discussion & Documentation
  • ↳   Documentation, Tips & Tricks
  • ↳   Gentoo Chat
  • ↳   Gentoo Forums Feedback
  • ↳   Duplicate Threads
  • International Gentoo Users
  • ↳   中文 (Chinese)
  • ↳   Dutch
  • ↳   Finnish
  • ↳   French
  • ↳   Deutsches Forum (German)
  • ↳   Diskussionsforum
  • ↳   Deutsche Dokumentation
  • ↳   Greek
  • ↳   Forum italiano (Italian)
  • ↳   Forum di discussione italiano
  • ↳   Risorse italiane (documentazione e tools)
  • ↳   Polskie forum (Polish)
  • ↳   Instalacja i sprzęt
  • ↳   Polish OTW
  • ↳   Portuguese
  • ↳   Documentação, Ferramentas e Dicas
  • ↳   Russian
  • ↳   Scandinavian
  • ↳   Spanish
  • ↳   Other Languages
  • Architectures & Platforms
  • ↳   Gentoo on ARM
  • ↳   Gentoo on PPC
  • ↳   Gentoo on Sparc
  • ↳   Gentoo on Alternative Architectures
  • ↳   Gentoo on AMD64
  • ↳   Gentoo for Mac OS X (Portage for Mac OS X)
  • Board index
  • All times are UTC
  • Delete cookies

© 2001–2026 Gentoo Foundation, Inc.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

Privacy Policy

 

 

magic