Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Blocked package? [SOLVED]
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Portage & Programming
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tmcca
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 May 2019
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 5:25 pm    Post subject: Blocked package? [SOLVED] Reply with quote

I am trying to figure out what to do here.

It says sys-fs/udev is blocking sys-fs/eudev

I selected profile set 23 and updated using emerge --ask --verbose --update --deep --newuse @world

Added more data to the title in the hopes of reducing the likelihood of duplicate threads.Chiitoo


Last edited by tmcca on Tue Oct 29, 2019 7:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fedeliallalinea
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 25385
Location: here

PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 5:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can post full emerge output and emerge --info? Probably you have problem with some use flag
_________________
Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sphakka
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 77

PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apparently there's something fishy with "virtual/libudev".

So, if you see this
Code:

[blocks B     ] sys-fs/udev ("sys-fs/udev" is blocking sys-fs/eudev-3.2.5)

 * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
 * installed at the same time on the same system.

  (sys-fs/udev-242:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
    >=sys-fs/udev-232:0/0[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,
      abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_riscv_lp64d(-)?,
      abi_riscv_lp64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?] (>=sys-fs/udev-232:0/0[abi_x86_64(-)]) required by (virtual/libudev-232-r1:0/1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)

  (sys-fs/eudev-3.2.5:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
    >=sys-fs/eudev-2.1.1 required by (virtual/udev-217:0/0::gentoo, installed)

Workaround is to mask
Code:

>=virtual/libudev-232-r1


That would downgrade to "virtual/libudev-215-r1" (weird: I have v232 installed, but it's no longer in tree!?).

Wrapped a long line to make the forum layout behave.Chiitoo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
charles17
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 3631

PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 6:29 pm    Post subject: Re: Blocked package? Reply with quote

tmcca wrote:
I am trying to figure out what to do here.

It says sys-fs/udev is blocking sys-fs/eudev

See https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/virtual/libudev?showmsg=1

So you might put
/etc/portage/package.accept_keywords:
# required by =virtual/libudev-232-r2 (argument)
=virtual/libudev-232-r2 ~amd64
# required by =sys-fs/eudev-3.2.9 (argument)
=sys-fs/eudev-3.2.9 ~amd64
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fedeliallalinea
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 25385
Location: here

PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 6:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sphakka wrote:
Apparently there's something fishy with "virtual/libudev".

You right
Code:
RDEPEND="
        !systemd? ( >=sys-fs/udev-232:0/0[${MULTILIB_USEDEP}] )
        systemd? ( >=sys-apps/systemd-232:0/2[${MULTILIB_USEDEP}] )
"


Code:
commit 9f09d6675b255190d9376671c68565c54662d771
Author: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Date:   Sat Oct 26 17:43:59 2019 +0200

    virtual/libudev: Remove incorrect eudev provider from 232
   
    Remove sys-fs/eudev from the list of providers for 232 since it does
    not satisfy the requirement on that version.  Since it is the only
    provider offering static-libs, remove that flag as well (reverse
    dependencies have already been updated to account for that).  While
    at it, bump to EAPI 7.
   
    People who are in dire need of static libraries or eudev in general
    can still install the older version of virtual/libudev.
   
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/697550
    Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>



sphakka wrote:
That would downgrade to "virtual/libudev-215-r1" (weird: I have v232 installed, but it's no longer in tree!?).

Or unmask 232-r2
_________________
Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
xanderal
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 06 Mar 2019
Posts: 129
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Same problem here.
sphakka wrote:
Workaround is to mask
Code:

>=virtual/libudev-232-r1
That would downgrade to "virtual/libudev-215-r1" (weird: I have v232 installed, but it's no longer in tree!?).
fedeliallalinea wrote:
Or unmask 232-r2
Is there a good reason to prefer one over the other?
virtual/libudev-232-r2 was just released a couple hours ago...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sphakka
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 77

PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 7:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the info, @fedeliallalinea. But
fedeliallalinea wrote:
Or unmask 232-r2

nope (I tried it), you need the older v215-r1. The message is clear: no eudev with "virtual/libudev-232". What's not clear to me from the bug report is if future libudev releases will support eudev (I don't use static-libs).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fedeliallalinea
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 25385
Location: here

PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

xanderal wrote:
Same problem here.
sphakka wrote:
Workaround is to mask
Code:

>=virtual/libudev-232-r1
That would downgrade to "virtual/libudev-215-r1" (weird: I have v232 installed, but it's no longer in tree!?).
fedeliallalinea wrote:
Or unmask 232-r2
Is there a good reason to prefer one over the other?
virtual/libudev-232-r2 was just released a couple hours ago...

No if some package don't require a >=232 version.
Version 232 for to install eudev-3.2.9 I think cause by this bug.
_________________
Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sphakka
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 77

PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For the time being (I use OpenRC), I stick to v232 in package.mask
Code:
>=virtual/libudev-232-r1
<virtual/libudev-232

Smells like eudev is lagging a bit behind...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
xanderal
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 06 Mar 2019
Posts: 129
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sphakka wrote:
fedeliallalinea wrote:
Or unmask 232-r2

nope (I tried it), you need the older v215-r1. The message is clear: no eudev with "virtual/libudev-232".
Are you sure? This is in the ebuild of 232-r2:
Code:
!systemd? ( || (
        >=sys-fs/eudev-3.2.9:0/0[${MULTILIB_USEDEP},static-libs(-)?]
        >=sys-fs/udev-232:0/0[${MULTILIB_USEDEP},static-libs(-)?]
) )
sphakka wrote:
What's not clear to me from the bug report is if future libudev releases will support eudev (I don't use static-libs).
The new release note looks promising.

edited to clean up code part
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sphakka
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 77

PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 8:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

xanderal wrote:
Are you sure? This is in the ebuild of 232-r2:
Code:
!systemd? ( || (
+      >=sys-fs/eudev-3.2.9:0/0[${MULTILIB_USEDEP},static-libs(-)?]
+      >=sys-fs/udev-232:0/0[${MULTILIB_USEDEP},static-libs(-)?]
+   ) )

I didn't work probably because sys-fs/eudev is at 3.2.5 while higher versions are masked. Will unmask and retry later.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
charles17
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 3631

PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 8:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sphakka wrote:
I didn't work probably because sys-fs/eudev is at 3.2.5 while higher versions are masked. Will unmask and retry later.

Go back 7 posts ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tmcca
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 May 2019
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the replies by entering this

Code:

 /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords:   
# required by =virtual/libudev-232-r2 (argument)
=virtual/libudev-232-r2 ~amd64
# required by =sys-fs/eudev-3.2.9 (argument)
=sys-fs/eudev-3.2.9 ~amd64
is a temporary fix correct? Is this the correct approach to solve this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
xanderal
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 06 Mar 2019
Posts: 129
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 10:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, I just finished doing an upgrade with the workaround charles17 suggested.
No errors to report, everything is working fine ;) Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UlvHare
n00b
n00b


Joined: 09 Sep 2015
Posts: 16
Location: USSR

PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you all for the information! It saved me from eudev loss and a working day to restore.
Really I was shocked:

  1. eudev is necessary (for desktop without systemd)
  2. today update causing eudev loss in stable system
  3. are we on Gentoo or on Arch? :wink:


Bad joke or developers need some rest, not work at Sunday night.

After reading this tread my workaround is:
Code:

alver@hare ~ $ cat /etc/portage/package.mask/libudev
=virtual/libudev-232-r1

which downgraded it to ver. 215-r1 and let me normal daily update. Reboot... So far so good.

Waiting for stabilizing virtual/libudev-232-r2 and sys-fs/eudev-3.2.9... or new surprises?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fedeliallalinea
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 25385
Location: here

PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

UlvHare wrote:
Waiting for stabilizing virtual/libudev-232-r2 and sys-fs/eudev-3.2.9... or new surprises?

No surprises, the problem arises from this bug.

UlvHare wrote:
Bad joke or developers need some rest, not work at Sunday night.

Maybe (I'm in no position to know) the better solution was to mask the libudev-232-r1 package, but also developers can make mistakes and formus, irc, ml,... are here for help community.
_________________
Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jserink
l33t
l33t


Joined: 30 Jan 2004
Posts: 993

PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Charles17 solution worked for me aswell.

In my /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords:
# required by =virtual/libudev-232-r2 (argument)
=virtual/libudev-232-r2 ~amd64
# # required by =sys-fs/eudev-3.2.9 (argument)
=sys-fs/eudev-3.2.9 ~amd64


Cheers,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 5105
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fedeliallalinea wrote:
the better solution was to mask the libudev-232-r1 package, but also developers can make mistakes and formus, irc, ml,... are here for help community.


The devs are too gung-ho about removing ebuilds that are considered updated.
There's really no harm in an ebuild sitting for a few days or a week to make sure the new one works properly.
In cases like this, then simply masking the upgrade would allow the currently working ebuild/installed pkg to continue to work.
_________________
PRIME x570-pro, 3700x, RX 550 - 5.8 zen kernel
Acer E5-575 (laptop), i3-7100u - i965 - 5.5 zen kernel
---both---
gcc 9.3.0, profile 17.1 (no-pie) amd64-no-multilib, eudev, openrc, openbox

The New OTW
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Josef.95
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 03 Sep 2007
Posts: 3953
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 12:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Should now be fixed, see https://bugs.gentoo.org/698726#c6
A fresh
Code:
emerge --sync
should now help :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UlvHare
n00b
n00b


Joined: 09 Sep 2015
Posts: 16
Location: USSR

PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 7:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fedeliallalinea wrote:

No surprises, the problem arises from this bug.

Very strange, IMO. That bug is specific for Gnome without systemd and results of such "cure" affect many more users.

fedeliallalinea wrote:

Maybe (I'm in no position to know) the better solution was to mask the libudev-232-r1 package, but also developers can make mistakes and formus, irc, ml,... are here for help community.

Yes, great thanks to this forum again!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fedeliallalinea
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 25385
Location: here

PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 7:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

UlvHare wrote:
fedeliallalinea wrote:

No surprises, the problem arises from this bug.

Very strange, IMO. That bug is specific for Gnome without systemd and results of such "cure" affect many more users.

Now virtual/libudev-232-r2 and sys-fs/eudev-3.2.9 are stable and problem is solved
_________________
Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chiitoo
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 2223
Location: Here and Away Again

PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Moved from Installing Gentoo to Portage & Programming, as this isn't specific to installing, and others might better find it here.
_________________
Kind regards,
Chiitoo.

You might remember me from Gentoo projects such as Forums, LXQt, Qt, and Wine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 5105
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

fedeliallalinea wrote:
Now virtual/libudev-232-r2 and sys-fs/eudev-3.2.9 are stable and problem is solved


Now if we could only do something about the devs creating the problem in the first place.

Too bad gentoo doesn't have a QA division.
_________________
PRIME x570-pro, 3700x, RX 550 - 5.8 zen kernel
Acer E5-575 (laptop), i3-7100u - i965 - 5.5 zen kernel
---both---
gcc 9.3.0, profile 17.1 (no-pie) amd64-no-multilib, eudev, openrc, openbox

The New OTW
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Naib
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 5879
Location: Removed by Neddy

PostPosted: Wed Oct 30, 2019 1:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anon-E-moose wrote:
fedeliallalinea wrote:
Now virtual/libudev-232-r2 and sys-fs/eudev-3.2.9 are stable and problem is solved


Now if we could only do something about the devs creating the problem in the first place.

Too bad gentoo doesn't have a QA division.

or non-partisan dev's

...
Quote:

(In reply to Michał Górny from comment #9)
> (In reply to Anton Bolshakov from comment #8)
> > The current stable tree is broken. Please sync stabilization and do it at
> > one go.
>
> It is not broken. It simply doesn't support eudev anymore. This may change
> in the future but doesn't change the fact that eudev is barely alive.


The deptree is broken, which basically is a (QA) violation.


spinning something as not supported when it was a QA problem is low
_________________
https://www.otw20.com/ Where you can talk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 5105
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Wed Oct 30, 2019 2:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Naib wrote:
spinning something as not supported when it was a QA problem is low


Yeah, but it works if your goal is to destabilize/destroy gentoo.
_________________
PRIME x570-pro, 3700x, RX 550 - 5.8 zen kernel
Acer E5-575 (laptop), i3-7100u - i965 - 5.5 zen kernel
---both---
gcc 9.3.0, profile 17.1 (no-pie) amd64-no-multilib, eudev, openrc, openbox

The New OTW
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Portage & Programming All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum