View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
vastchen n00b
Joined: 22 Apr 2016 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 6:15 am Post subject: Eee pc 2G surf Intel Celeron M[SOLVE] |
|
|
I buy a old eee pc 2G Intel Celeron M ULV 800MHz (is this cpu?)
i got a problem choice
Processor type and features
Processor family
Code: |
( ) 386
( ) 486
( ) 586/K5/5x86/6x86/6x86MX
( ) Pentium-Classic
( ) Pentium-MMX
( ) Pentium-Pro
( ) Pentium-II/Celeron(pre-Coppermine)
( ) Pentium-III/Celeron(Coppermine)/Pentium-III Xeon
( ) Pentium M
( ) Pentium-4/Celeron(P4-based)/Pentium-4 M/Xeon
( ) K6/K6-II/K6-III
( ) Athlon/Duron/K7
( ) Opteron/Athlon64/Hammer/K8
( ) Crusoe
( ) Efficeon
( ) Winchip-C6
( ) Winchip-2
( ) Winchip-2A/Winchip-3
( ) GeodeGX1
( ) Geode GX/LX
( ) CyrixIII/VIA-C3
( ) VIA C3-2 (Nehemiah)
( ) Generic x86 support
|
( ) Pentium-III/Celeron(Coppermine)/Pentium-III Xeon
( ) Pentium M
i saw wikipaper say Celeron M same as Pentium M
but Pentium M no Celeron so Which option should I choose? _________________ gentoo user
Last edited by vastchen on Mon Jul 23, 2018 3:23 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PrSo Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 01 Jun 2017 Posts: 136
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ant P. Watchman
Joined: 18 Apr 2009 Posts: 6920
|
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1st gen eeepc is a Pentium M, it also lacks PAE so you need to make sure that's disabled for it to boot. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mike155 Advocate
Joined: 17 Sep 2010 Posts: 4438 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
vastchen n00b
Joined: 22 Apr 2016 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 3:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
ok tonight i will post lscpu the eeepc maybe is Eeepc 700 2G mean 2g ssd 512 ram
Asus Eee PC 2G Surf Specs:
Code: |
800 MHz Intel Celeron ULV processor
512 MB DDR2 RAM (Soldered to motherboard)
2 GB Solid State Disk (Soldered to motherboard)
7" 800×480 LCD monitor
10/100 Ethernet
802.11b/g wireless
VGA port
SD Card Slot (supporting SDHC)
4400 mAh Battery (4 cell)
|
Fromhttp://www.tabletpcreview.com/tabletreview/asus-eee-pc-2g-surf-user-review/ _________________ gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vastchen n00b
Joined: 22 Apr 2016 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i also think it is Pentium M i will try it _________________ gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vastchen n00b
Joined: 22 Apr 2016 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vastchen wrote: |
ok tonight i will post lscpu the eeepc maybe is Eeepc 700 2G mean 2g ssd 512 ram
Asus Eee PC 2G Surf Specs:
Code: |
800 MHz Intel Celeron ULV processor
512 MB DDR2 RAM (Soldered to motherboard)
2 GB Solid State Disk (Soldered to motherboard)
7" 800×480 LCD monitor
10/100 Ethernet
802.11b/g wireless
VGA port
SD Card Slot (supporting SDHC)
4400 mAh Battery (4 cell)
|
Fromhttp://www.tabletpcreview.com/tabletreview/asus-eee-pc-2g-surf-user-review/ |
Code: |
Architecture: i686
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 1
On-line CPU(s) list: 0
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 1
Socket(s): 1
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
CPU family: 6
Model: 13
Model name: Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 800MHz
Stepping: 8
CPU MHz: 571.344
BogoMIPS: 1142.68
Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss tm pbe nx bts
|
_________________ gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mike155 Advocate
Joined: 17 Sep 2010 Posts: 4438 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PrSo and Ant P. are right - Pentium M seems to be the right option. You can disable SMP and frequency scaling. The processor seems to have PAE, so you should enable it in the kernel config, |
|
Back to top |
|
|
johngalt Apprentice
Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 258 Location: 3rd Rock
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
related question that might help OP:
On my Dell Inspiron 3521, which has a Celeron 1007U (which I found to be listed under Sandy Bridge) I opted to emerge gentoo-sources with USE='experimental', which allowed for greater flexibility in the kernel processor choice under Code: | Processor type and features ---> Processor family | which I set to Code: | Native optimizations autodetected by GCC | along with Code: | CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" | in /etc/portage/make.conf.
Going that route, from my understanding, allows for direct optimization, plus no need to worry about 'feature' that might be enabled in non-Celeron processors in the same family, right?
If so, would that be a better route to go, or would it simply be a different (not necessarily any better) route to go versus making sure that is set up correctly for the Celeron CPU in /etc/portage/make.conf?
Or, is this not good practice? _________________
desultory wrote: | If you want to retain credibility as a functional adult; when you are told that you are acting boorishly, the correct response is to consider that possibility and act accordingly to correct that behavior. |
Amen. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vastchen n00b
Joined: 22 Apr 2016 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
mike155 wrote: | PrSo and Ant P. are right - Pentium M seems to be the right option. You can disable SMP and frequency scaling. The processor seems to have PAE, so you should enable it in the kernel config, |
OK thanks _________________ gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vastchen n00b
Joined: 22 Apr 2016 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
johngalt wrote: | related question that might help OP:
On my Dell Inspiron 3521, which has a Celeron 1007U (which I found to be listed under Sandy Bridge) I opted to emerge gentoo-sources with USE='experimental', which allowed for greater flexibility in the kernel processor choice under Code: | Processor type and features ---> Processor family | which I set to Code: | Native optimizations autodetected by GCC | along with Code: | CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" | in /etc/portage/make.conf.
Going that route, from my understanding, allows for direct optimization, plus no need to worry about 'feature' that might be enabled in non-Celeron processors in the same family, right?
If so, would that be a better route to go, or would it simply be a different (not necessarily any better) route to go versus making sure that is set up correctly for the Celeron CPU in /etc/portage/make.conf?
Or, is this not good practice? |
in make.config file i use this
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=pentium-m -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
i use a virtualbox to build thse systemd than use nfs to install binpackage . Celeron m 800MHz to slow....
Code: | gcc -v -E -x c -march=native -mtune=native - < /dev/null 2>&1 | grep cc1 | perl -pe 's/ -mno-\S+//g; s/^.* - //g;' | is pentium-m _________________ gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ant P. Watchman
Joined: 18 Apr 2009 Posts: 6920
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mike155 wrote: | PrSo and Ant P. are right - Pentium M seems to be the right option. You can disable SMP and frequency scaling. The processor seems to have PAE, so you should enable it in the kernel config, |
Hmm, my eee701 wouldn't boot until I removed PAE support from my kernel, but maybe the 700 is different. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|