View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
devsk Advocate
Joined: 24 Oct 2003 Posts: 2995 Location: Bay Area, CA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 3:03 am Post subject: plasma 5.13 status |
|
|
Folks,
Is there a place where I can follow what's going on with plasma 5.13, when will it be in portage etc.?
Thanks,
-devsk |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fedeliallalinea Administrator
Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Posts: 30837 Location: here
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I not find much information, something on wiki.
You can also join #gentoo-kde and ask them _________________ Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fedeliallalinea Administrator
Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Posts: 30837 Location: here
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After a brief search plasma-5.13 need >=qt-5.10.1 then there is need qt-5.11 to be released it.
You can look Qt 5.11 tracker for check the status. _________________ Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
devsk Advocate
Joined: 24 Oct 2003 Posts: 2995 Location: Bay Area, CA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
fedeliallalinea wrote: | After a brief search plasma-5.13 need >=qt-5.10.1 then there is need qt-5.11 to be released it.
You can look Qt 5.11 tracker for check the status. | Looks like it will be a while before plasma-5.13 hits the portage tree. Qt 5.11 is a beast and breaks a whole lot of stuff. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fedeliallalinea Administrator
Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Posts: 30837 Location: here
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not in a hurry, I installed [url=plasma-browser-integration]plasma-browser-integration[/url] and gmenu-dbusmenu-proxy (for global menu in gtk) and my 5.12.5 is like a 5.13 (yes there is no blur effect e some UI improvement but for me isn't important) _________________ Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yamakuzure Advocate
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 2280 Location: Adendorf, Germany
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
devsk wrote: | Qt 5.11 is a beast and breaks a whole lot of stuff. | My laptop (~1.600 packages, full Plasma DE) is on Qt-5.11.1 since it became available in the Qt Overlay (via layman). It isn't even masked, only keyworded.
The upgrade from Qt-5.9.6 was going through without any incident and the machine works without any issues. So at least for me the "whole lot of stuff" was exactly nothing.
Hmm... The only two open bugs are about missing includes. Patches for the (absolute harmless) fixes are already available. _________________ Important German:- "Aha" - German reaction to pretend that you are really interested while giving no f*ck.
- "Tja" - German reaction to the apocalypse, nuclear war, an alien invasion or no bread in the house.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
albright Advocate
Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 2588 Location: Near Toronto
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | It isn't even masked, only keyworded. |
Are you sure; it looks pretty hard masked on my machine:
Code: | eix -I qtcore
[I] dev-qt/qtcore
Available versions:
(4) 4.8.7-r4
(5) 5.9.4-r2(5/5.9)^t (~)5.9.6(5/5.9)^t [M](~)5.11.0_rc2-r1(5/5.11)^t
|
_________________ .... there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth
doing as simply messing about with Linux ...
(apologies to Kenneth Graeme) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yamakuzure Advocate
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 2280 Location: Adendorf, Germany
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
albright wrote: | Quote: | It isn't even masked, only keyworded. |
Are you sure; it looks pretty hard masked on my machine:
Code: | eix -I qtcore
[I] dev-qt/qtcore
Available versions:
(4) 4.8.7-r4
(5) 5.9.4-r2(5/5.9)^t (~)5.9.6(5/5.9)^t [M](~)5.11.0_rc2-r1(5/5.11)^t
|
| Yes, that is true, but: Yamakuzure wrote: | since it became available in the Qt Overlay (via layman). |
_________________ Important German:- "Aha" - German reaction to pretend that you are really interested while giving no f*ck.
- "Tja" - German reaction to the apocalypse, nuclear war, an alien invasion or no bread in the house.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fedeliallalinea Administrator
Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Posts: 30837 Location: here
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
albright wrote: | Are you sure; it looks pretty hard masked on my machine:
Code: | eix -I qtcore
[I] dev-qt/qtcore
Available versions:
(4) 4.8.7-r4
(5) 5.9.4-r2(5/5.9)^t (~)5.9.6(5/5.9)^t [M](~)5.11.0_rc2-r1(5/5.11)^t
|
|
Yamakuzure say Qt Overlay and here are not hard masked
Code: | [U] dev-qt/qtcore
Available versions:
(4) 4.8.7-r4
(5) 5.9.4-r2(5/5.9)^t (~)5.9.6(5/5.9)^t **5.9.9999(5/5.9)[1] [M](~)5.11.0_rc2-r1(5/5.11)^t (~)5.11.1(5/5.11)^t[1] **5.11.9999(5/5.11)[1] **5.9999(5/5.9999)[1]
{aqua debug +exceptions +glib iconv icu libressl pch qt3support ssl systemd test ABI_MIPS="n32 n64 o32" ABI_PPC="32 64" ABI_S390="32 64" ABI_X86="32 64 x32"}
Installed versions: 5.9.6(5)^t(08:54:31 14. 06. 18)(icu -debug -systemd -test)
Homepage: https://www.qt.io/
Description: Cross-platform application development framework
[1] "qt" /var/lib/layman/qt |
_________________ Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
devsk Advocate
Joined: 24 Oct 2003 Posts: 2995 Location: Bay Area, CA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2018 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yamakuzure wrote: | devsk wrote: | Qt 5.11 is a beast and breaks a whole lot of stuff. | My laptop (~1.600 packages, full Plasma DE) is on Qt-5.11.1 since it became available in the Qt Overlay (via layman). It isn't even masked, only keyworded.
The upgrade from Qt-5.9.6 was going through without any incident and the machine works without any issues. So at least for me the "whole lot of stuff" was exactly nothing.
Hmm... The only two open bugs are about missing includes. Patches for the (absolute harmless) fixes are already available. | If there are no issues, why has it not made into portage yet? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asturm Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 8933
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2018 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is a bit more to packaging than 'built without error on one system'. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
devsk Advocate
Joined: 24 Oct 2003 Posts: 2995 Location: Bay Area, CA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2018 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
asturm wrote: | There is a bit more to packaging than 'built without error on one system'. | I would say even more than that. Not just built, but run without error on one system. If it runs for me, it does not matter. It has to run on many testers' machines, with potentially large number of USE combos.
With a meta distro like Gentoo, its even harder than the usual fixed-at-build-time distros e.g. I may be using a DB backend for a package which is different from yours and that DB backend has different upgrade requirements/glitches/quirks, which need to be worked through by ebuild'ers.
So, my question was mostly rhetorical.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jpp_ Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 23 Oct 2009 Posts: 110 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2018 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it is in portage now. ~amd64.
Thanks to the devs for the hard work
Regards |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|