View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
causality Apprentice
Joined: 03 Jun 2006 Posts: 236
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:28 pm Post subject: False warning after upgrade of nvidia-drivers? |
|
|
My video card is an older Nvidia GeForce GT 520. From the output of "lspci":
Code: | 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF119 [GeForce GT 520] (rev a1) |
I just updated nvidia-drivers (partly so I can run kernel 4.16.x) and received this message:
Code: | * Messages for package x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-396.18-r1:
* ***** WARNING *****
*
* You are currently installing a version of nvidia-drivers that is
* known not to work with a video card you have installed on your
* system. If this is intentional, please ignore this. If it is not
* please perform the following steps:
*
* Add the following mask entry to /etc/portage/package.mask by
* echo ">=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-391.0.0" > /etc/portage/package.mask/nvidia-drivers
*
* Failure to perform the steps above could result in a non-working
* X setup.
*
* For more information please read:
* http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_32667.html |
This is confusing because according to the nvidia.com description, driver version 396.18 *does* support this card: http://www.nvidia.com/download/driverResults.aspx/133571/en-us. I checked the ebuild file which led me to the file /usr/portage/eclass/nvidia-driver.eclass. That file gets its data from a different source, http://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/396.18/README/supportedchips.html. That second source indicates that the prior link is more accurate. I have not yet rebooted to load the new kernel and nvidia-drivers version.
Should I expect the driver to fail for this card despite being listed on nvidia.com's download page as supported? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fedeliallalinea Administrator
Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Posts: 30909 Location: here
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Section_8 l33t
Joined: 22 May 2004 Posts: 627
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I got the same warning trying to upgrade to 396.18 on a GTX 970, and just ignored it and installed it anyway - no problems so far. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Juippisi Developer
Joined: 30 Sep 2005 Posts: 724 Location: /home
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
It could be because 396.xx is still the beta-release while 390.48 is the latest stable :) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fedeliallalinea Administrator
Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Posts: 30909 Location: here
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Juippisi wrote: |
It could be because 396.xx is still the beta-release while 390.48 is the latest stable |
Ah ok thanks for clarification, I thinking that 369.xx was stable for nvidia _________________ Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yamakuzure Advocate
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 2284 Location: Adendorf, Germany
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Naib Watchman
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6051 Location: Removed by Neddy
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fedeliallalinea wrote: | Juippisi wrote: |
It could be because 396.xx is still the beta-release while 390.48 is the latest stable |
Ah ok thanks for clarification, I thinking that 369.xx was stable for nvidia | I saw that as well. I looked at the NV site and my card is supported. I think there is a logic flaw in the ebuild but I haven't had time to correct _________________
Quote: | Removed by Chiitoo |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jburns Veteran
Joined: 18 Jan 2007 Posts: 1214 Location: Massachusetts USA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|