Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
How fast can my laptop compile basic GUI packages?
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
crocket
Guru
Guru


Joined: 29 Apr 2017
Posts: 558

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 12:13 am    Post subject: How fast can my laptop compile basic GUI packages? Reply with quote

CPU : AMD A6-7310 APU with AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
RAM : 4GB shrunk down to 3.3GB due to AMD Radeon R4
SSD : 120GB

It seems I can't really speed up compilation and reduce the load on SSD with tmpfs on /var/tmp/portage because RAM is 3.3GB.

I just want to install and continually upgrade XFCE, libreoffice, okular, and chromium web browser.

How long would it take to compile and upgrade a gentoo system on my laptop?

I'm also considering void linux. Although its lack of third party repository limits my options, I don't need many packages on my laptop.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ant P.
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 6920

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I use a single-core Atom with 2GB RAM and manage to run a desktop plus chromium from source on it no problem. You don't really need a tmpfs, but having a desktop to distcc with might help.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crocket
Guru
Guru


Joined: 29 Apr 2017
Posts: 558

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 10:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ant P. wrote:
I use a single-core Atom with 2GB RAM and manage to run a desktop plus chromium from source on it no problem. You don't really need a tmpfs, but having a desktop to distcc with might help.


I don't need tmpfs, but without tmpfs, SSD will be worn.

How long does it usually take to upgrade on your machine?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Posts: 54237
Location: 56N 3W

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 11:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

crocket,

Despite the anecdotal evidence of users destroying early SSDs before their Gentoo install is complete, You should not have a problem today.

After several years doing monthly updates all on SSD.
Code:
SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate     0x002f   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   010    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  9 Power_On_Hours          0x0032   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       3993
 12 Power_Cycle_Count       0x0032   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       1214
170 Grown_Failing_Block_Ct  0x0033   100   100   010    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
171 Program_Fail_Count      0x0032   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       0
172 Erase_Fail_Count        0x0032   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       0
173 Wear_Leveling_Count     0x0033   100   100   010    Pre-fail  Always       -       23
174 Unexpect_Power_Loss_Ct  0x0032   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       341
181 Non4k_Aligned_Access    0x0022   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       12 0 12
183 SATA_Iface_Downshift    0x0032   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       0
184 End-to-End_Error        0x0033   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
187 Reported_Uncorrect      0x0032   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       0
188 Command_Timeout         0x0032   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       0
189 Factory_Bad_Block_Ct    0x000e   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       82
194 Temperature_Celsius     0x0022   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered  0x003a   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       0
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       0
197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0032   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0030   100   100   001    Old_age   Offline      -       0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count    0x0032   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       0
202 Perc_Rated_Life_Used    0x0018   100   100   001    Old_age   Offline      -       0
206 Write_Error_Rate        0x000e   100   100   001    Old_age   Always       -       0

the used lifetime (202) is reported as zero.

You can have the best of both worlds if you want to set it up, so that small packages (most things) build in tmpfs and bigger things use the SSD.
PORTAGE_TMPDIR can be set on a per package basis.
_________________
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 20067

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:42 pm    Post subject: Re: How fast can my laptop compile basic GUI packages? Reply with quote

crocket wrote:
It seems I can't really speed up compilation and reduce the load on SSD with tmpfs on /var/tmp/portage because RAM is 3.3GB.
You could set it up for use only when compiling and tell larger packages to compile not in tmpfs.

Portage TMPDIR on tmpfs wrote:
Per-package choices at compile time

Portage can be configured to build large packages outside of the tmpfs space on a per-package basis.

Create a file to tell Portage where to place the temporary files directory:

_________________
Quis separabit? Quo animo?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ant P.
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 6920

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NeddySeagoon wrote:
crocket,

Despite the anecdotal evidence of users destroying early SSDs before their Gentoo install is complete, You should not have a problem today.

After several years doing monthly updates all on SSD.
[...]
the used lifetime (202) is reported as zero.

The SSD on my laptop's so old it doesn't even *have* a lifetime counter! Still works fine.
Code:
SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate     0x000b   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  2 Throughput_Performance  0x0005   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Offline      -       0
  3 Unknown_JMF_Attribute   0x0007   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0013   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  7 Unknown_JMF_Attribute   0x000b   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  8 Unknown_JMF_Attribute   0x0005   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Offline      -       0
  9 Power_On_Hours          0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       23326
 10 Unknown_JMF_Attribute   0x0013   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
 12 Power_Cycle_Count       0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       3357
168 SATA_Phy_Error_Count    0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
175 Bad_Cluster_Table_Count 0x0003   100   100   010    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
192 Unexpect_Power_Loss_Ct  0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
194 Temperature_Celsius     0x0022   044   100   020    Old_age   Always       -       44 (Min/Max 22/44)
197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
240 Unknown_JMF_Attribute   0x0013   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
170 Bad_Block_Count         0x0003   100   100   010    Pre-fail  Always       -       0 381 21
173 Erase_Count             0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       4264 7409 4573

I have my syslog config tweaked to put excess noise in a tmpfs (mostly dhcp, cron and wpa_supplicant) but that's about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
C5ace
Guru
Guru


Joined: 23 Dec 2013
Posts: 472
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2018 3:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I compared build times: sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0-r1

# emerge sys-devel/gcc

HP Notebook Type1 Product Config Id CND5413TC5.P4Y45PA

With 6G tempdir:
real 114m16.880s
user 312m19.643s
sys 36m7.819s

No tempdir:
real 114m50.509s
user 312m1.466s
sys 35m49.349s

Code:

HP Notebook Type1 Product Config Id CND5413TC5.P4Y45PA

CPU:   
Model: 22.0.1 "AMD A6-5200 APU with Radeon(TM) HD Graphics"
  Clock: 1996 MHz
  BogoMips: 3992.63
  Cache: 2048 kb
  Units/Processor: 4

RAM: 
Bank: "CHANNEL A"
    Manufacturer: "Hynix"
    Serial: "1010DD97"
    Asset Tag: "Asset Tag:"
    Part Number: "HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB"
    Memory Array: #15
    Form Factor: 0x0d (SODIMM)
    Type: 0x18 (Other)
    Type Detail: 0x4080 (Synchronous)
    Data Width: 64 bits
    Size: 8 GB
    Speed: 1600 MHz
 
DISK:
Model: "TOSHIBA MQ01ABD1" (STATA Rotating Iron)
  Vendor: "TOSHIBA"
  Device: "MQ01ABD1"
  Revision: "2C"


Linux uses nearly all free RAM as disk cache. This means in practice using tmpfs does not bring significant higher build speeds. Build speeds can only be significantly increased by using Precompiled Headers and using "C" instead of "C++" to code applications. Also changing the compiler flags to zero optimization and don't use templates.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Posts: 54237
Location: 56N 3W

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2018 9:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

C5ace,

Correct. If you have the RAM to build in tmpfs, the kernel will tend to do that anyway.
Without tmpfs, the writes will be committed to the HDD but never read as the data is still in cache.
tmpfs then saves a few CPU cycles setting up the DMA transfers for the writes and the RAM bus bandwidth that the writes consume.
All in all, not a lot.
_________________
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crocket
Guru
Guru


Joined: 29 Apr 2017
Posts: 558

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 3:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

C5ace wrote:
# emerge sys-devel/gcc

With 6G tempdir:
real 114m16.880s
user 312m19.643s
sys 36m7.819s

No tempdir:
real 114m50.509s
user 312m1.466s
sys 35m49.349s

CPU // Model: 22.0.1 "AMD A6-5200 APU with Radeon(TM) HD Graphics"

RAM // 8G


It takes almost 2 hours to compile gcc with A6-5200. According to https://www.cpubenchmark.net, the processing power of A6-5200 is 2415, and that of A6-7310 is 2685.
My laptop has less RAM than yours.

I guess it'll take about 7~10 hours to upgrade gentoo each week on my laptop. How long did it take for you to build a gentoo desktop on your machine? How long does it usually take to upgrade your gentoo?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cuong Nguyen
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Posts: 152

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 4:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If TMPFS does help speed up compiling then use disk as PORTAGE_TMPDIR could help you to save and continue compiling after crash.
I always use RAM as tmp, even bigger than physical RAM
Code:

mount -t tmpfs -o mode=1777,size=16G tmpfs /var/tmp/portage

can fit any package.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum