Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Welches 17.1 Profil fuer Xfce ?
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours
View posts from last 7 days

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Deutsches Forum (German)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
LuxJux
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 01 Mar 2016
Posts: 141

PostPosted: Wed Dec 27, 2017 11:53 pm    Post subject: Welches 17.1 Profil fuer Xfce ? Reply with quote

An KDE trau ich mich noch nicht ran.
Ich habs zwar porbiert. Doch da klatscht das Menu immer weg.

Code:
lasma ~ # eselect profile list
Available profile symlink targets:
  [1]   default/linux/amd64/13.0
  [2]   default/linux/amd64/13.0/selinux
  [3]   default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop
  [4]   default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome
  [5]   default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome/systemd
  [6]   default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/plasma
  [7]   default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/plasma/systemd
  [8]   default/linux/amd64/13.0/developer
  [9]   default/linux/amd64/13.0/no-multilib
  [10]  default/linux/amd64/13.0/systemd
  [11]  default/linux/amd64/13.0/x32
  [12]  default/linux/amd64/17.0
  [13]  default/linux/amd64/17.0/selinux
  [14]  default/linux/amd64/17.0/hardened
  [15]  default/linux/amd64/17.0/hardened/selinux
  [16]  default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop
  [17]  default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop/gnome
  [18]  default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop/gnome/systemd
  [19]  default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop/plasma *
  [20]  default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop/plasma/systemd
  [21]  default/linux/amd64/17.0/developer
  [22]  default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib
  [23]  default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib/hardened
  [24]  default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib/hardened/selinux
  [25]  default/linux/amd64/17.0/systemd
  [26]  default/linux/amd64/17.0/x32
  [27]  default/linux/amd64/17.1
  [28]  default/linux/amd64/17.1/selinux
  [29]  default/linux/amd64/17.1/hardened
  [30]  default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop
  [31]  default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/gnome
  [32]  default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/gnome/systemd
  [33]  default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/plasma
  [34]  default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/plasma/systemd
  [35]  default/linux/amd64/17.1/developer
  [36]  default/linux/amd64/17.1/no-multilib
  [37]  default/linux/amd64/17.1/no-multilib/hardened
  [38]  default/linux/amd64/17.1/no-multilib/hardened/selinux
  [39]  default/linux/amd64/17.1/systemd
  [40]  hardened/linux/amd64
  [41]  hardened/linux/amd64/selinux
  [42]  hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib
  [43]  hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux
  [44]  hardened/linux/amd64/x32
  [45]  default/linux/musl/amd64
  [46]  hardened/linux/musl/amd64
  [47]  default/linux/musl/amd64/x32
  [48]  hardened/linux/musl/amd64/x32
  [49]  default/linux/uclibc/amd64
  [50]  hardened/linux/uclibc/amd64
plasma ~ #
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LuxJux
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 01 Mar 2016
Posts: 141

PostPosted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 2:35 am    Post subject: Kernel mit * chen Reply with quote

jHier stand ploetzlich diese Frage im Raum
Funktioniert ein Kernel ohne * set ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
l3u
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Posts: 2251
Location: Konradsreuth (Germany)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2017 8:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Naja, wenn du KDE (Plasma) nicht nutzen willst, wie wäre es dann mit einem Nicht-Plasma-Profil? Z. B.
Code:
[30]  default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop

?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oliver2104
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 176
Location: Wien

PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sind die 17.1 Profile überhaupt schon zu empfehlen ?
siehe Auszug aus -> eselect news (2017-12-26-experimental-amd64-17-1-profiles)
Quote:
A new set of 17.1 amd64 profiles has been added to the Gentoo
repository. Those profiles switch to a more standard 'no SYMLINK_LIB'
multilib layout, and require explicit migration as described below. They
are considered experimental at the moment, and have a fair risk
of breaking your system

dh. im schlimmsten Fall droht Systemzusammenbruch (breaking your system)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
l3u
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Posts: 2251
Location: Konradsreuth (Germany)

PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2017 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nein, sind sie nicht. Soll man testen auf Systemen, wo's egal ist.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mv
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 5830

PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oliver2104 wrote:
dh. im schlimmsten Fall droht Systemzusammenbruch (breaking your system)

Ausgeschlossen werden kann dies natürlich nie, aber das ist extrem unwahrscheinlich.
Es ist vergleichbar mit einem frühen gcc-upgrade: Einige wenige Pakete benötigen u.U. noch Patches, damit sie sich kompilieren oder starten lassen. Im Gegensatz zu einem Compiler-Upgrade hat man aber nicht die Möglichkeit "mal eben schnell" den alten Compiler anzuwerfen, wenn man ein betroffenes Paket jetzt unbedingt dringend braucht und den Fehler auf die Schnelle nicht beheben kann.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Deutsches Forum (German) All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum