| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Raoul
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 108
Location: Adelaide, Aust.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fedeliallalinea
Administrator
Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 30894
Location: here
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2016 8:59 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Bug
_________________
Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raoul
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 108
Location: Adelaide, Aust.
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Indeed. Thank you.
This doesn't look like it will be resolved any time soon. I did some further reading and found that there are two versions of gst (0.10 and 1.x) and the 0.10 is no longer under development.
If I do | Code: | | equery g gst-plugins-ffmpeg |
i get this result:
| Code: | * Searching for gst-plugins-ffmpeg ...
* dependency graph for media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg-0.10.13_p201211-r5
`-- media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg-0.10.13_p201211-r5 amd64
`-- media-libs/gstreamer-0.10.36-r2 (>=media-libs/gstreamer-0.10.36-r2) amd64 [abi_x86_32(-)? abi_x86_64(-)? abi_x86_x32(-)? abi_mips_n32(-)? abi_mips_n64(-)? abi_mips_o32(-)? abi_ppc_32(-)? abi_ppc_64(-)? abi_s390_32(-)? abi_s390_64(-)?]
`-- media-libs/gst-plugins-base-0.10.36-r2 (>=media-libs/gst-plugins-base-0.10.36) amd64 [abi_x86_32(-)? abi_x86_64(-)? abi_x86_x32(-)? abi_mips_n32(-)? abi_mips_n64(-)? abi_mips_o32(-)? abi_ppc_32(-)? abi_ppc_64(-)? abi_s390_32(-)? abi_s390_64(-)?]
`-- media-video/ffmpeg-3.2.1 (>=media-video/ffmpeg-1.2.6-r1) ~amd64 [postproc abi_x86_32(-)? abi_x86_64(-)? abi_x86_x32(-)? abi_mips_n32(-)? abi_mips_n64(-)? abi_mips_o32(-)? abi_ppc_32(-)? abi_ppc_64(-)? abi_s390_32(-)? abi_s390_64(-)?]
`-- media-video/libav-11.8 (>=media-video/libav-11.3) amd64 [abi_x86_32(-)? abi_x86_64(-)? abi_x86_x32(-)? abi_mips_n32(-)? abi_mips_n64(-)? abi_mips_o32(-)? abi_ppc_32(-)? abi_ppc_64(-)? abi_s390_32(-)? abi_s390_64(-)?]
`-- media-libs/libpostproc-10.20140517-r1 (>=media-libs/libpostproc-10.20140517-r1) amd64 [abi_x86_32(-)? abi_x86_64(-)? abi_x86_x32(-)? abi_mips_n32(-)? abi_mips_n64(-)? abi_mips_o32(-)? abi_ppc_32(-)? abi_ppc_64(-)? abi_s390_32(-)? abi_s390_64(-)?]
`-- dev-lang/orc-0.4.26-r1 (>=dev-lang/orc-0.4.17) amd64 [abi_x86_32(-)? abi_x86_64(-)? abi_x86_x32(-)? abi_mips_n32(-)? abi_mips_n64(-)? abi_mips_o32(-)? abi_ppc_32(-)? abi_ppc_64(-)? abi_s390_32(-)? abi_s390_64(-)?]
`-- virtual/pkgconfig-0-r1 (>=virtual/pkgconfig-0-r1) amd64 [abi_x86_32(-)? abi_x86_64(-)? abi_x86_x32(-)? abi_mips_n32(-)? abi_mips_n64(-)? abi_mips_o32(-)? abi_ppc_32(-)? abi_ppc_64(-)? abi_s390_32(-)? abi_s390_64(-)?]
[ media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg-0.10.13_p201211-r5 stats: packages (8), max depth (1) ] |
So, my question is, how can I force my system to use the 1.x version of gst instead?
Regards
Raoul
_________________
**************
Not all pain is gain. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
saboya
Guru
Joined: 28 Nov 2006
Posts: 552
Location: Brazil
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Add it to /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raoul
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 108
Location: Adelaide, Aust.
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Saboya,
I'm not sure I understand how to do this in this instance. I have a package.keywords file already. I don't quote see how package.accept_keywords is different and what the actual entry would look like. I would perhaps have thought putting gst-0.10 into package.mask.
Regards
Raoul
_________________
**************
Not all pain is gain. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hu
Moderator
Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 21602
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| package.keywords is the legacy name for the file that is now package.accept_keywords. Both work, but you should migrate to the latter. You can apply the previous advice with your package.keywords file for now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wallsandfences
Guru
Joined: 29 Mar 2010
Posts: 378
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I have the same problem, but masking the gst-package does not lead to emerging a higher version but to portage demanding to unmask it again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hu
Moderator
Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 21602
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Why does Portage want to unmask it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
davidbrooke
Guru
Joined: 03 Jan 2015
Posts: 341
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Raoul wrote: | Thanks Saboya,
I'm not sure I understand how to do this in this instance. I have a package.keywords file already. I don't quote see how package.accept_keywords is different and what the actual entry would look like. I would perhaps have thought putting gst-0.10 into package.mask.
Regards
Raoul |
From what I have read so far in this thread....I believe there is a misunderstanding on your part Raoul. There is only one version of media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg but there are multiple versions of the gst-plugins-meta package. So you choices are:
1. Keep the current media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg package
2. Remove media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg package and any packages that depend on it. This is the route I took.
After reviewing the bug report:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575056
The very last entry....The individual downgrades ffmpeg to version 2.8.10 and then removes media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg.
I did the same as well as removing another package that depended on media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg then upgraded back to ffmpeg 3.2.2.
Hope this helps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Desktop Environments
