View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
LukynZ Apprentice
Joined: 19 Dec 2008 Posts: 230 Location: The Czech Republic
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:18 pm Post subject: Nvidia 325 and kernel 3.12 |
|
|
Nvidia 331 drivers are suddenly masked, however older ones are unable to compile against 3.12 kernel even with patches for 3.11 (well >=). So what can I do as KDE user? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nenemsis5 n00b
Joined: 23 Oct 2007 Posts: 72
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aCOSwt Bodhisattva
Joined: 19 Oct 2007 Posts: 2537 Location: Hilbert space
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't unmask! Numerous problems are being reported everywhere with nvidia-drivers >= 319.60
Do prefer downgrading to 304.116 which is compatible with latest kernels. _________________
Last edited by aCOSwt on Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shazeal Apprentice
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 206 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Zero problems here with the 331.20 drivers since release. I am using it on two machines, the gentoo one with custom 3.12 kernel is perfect. The debian machine I had to roll back the kernel to the default 3.2 otherwise I got Xorg segfaults using the 3.10 kernel.
EDIT: Also the 304 drivers have issues with Composite + XFT fonts, which is fixed in 331.20 if that is relevant to you. _________________ CFLAGS="-OmgWTFR1CE --fun-lol-loops --march=asmx86go" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LukynZ Apprentice
Joined: 19 Dec 2008 Posts: 230 Location: The Czech Republic
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's masked due to KDE related problems and I am KDE user, so unmask is really not option for me 304 is older one than 325 and it's compatible with 3.12 kernel? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aCOSwt Bodhisattva
Joined: 19 Oct 2007 Posts: 2537 Location: Hilbert space
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LukynZ wrote: | 304 is older one than 325 and it's compatible with 3.12 kernel? |
nvidia-drivers-304.116.ebuild wrote: | if use kernel_linux && kernel_is ge 3 13 ; then
ewarn "Gentoo supports kernels which are supported by NVIDIA"
ewarn "which are limited to the following kernels:"
ewarn "<sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.13"
ewarn "<sys-kernel/vanilla-sources-3.13" |
In addition to this... its precisely the release that nividia recommends for my card... which is... not old. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dmpogo Advocate
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 3267 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LukynZ wrote: | It's masked due to KDE related problems and I am KDE user, so unmask is really not option for me 304 is older one than 325 and it's compatible with 3.12 kernel? |
Nvidia has a set of legacy long-term drivers which it continues to update to newer kernels. So no surprise that some of them got updated, while intermediate release in the latest family is not.
Last edited by dmpogo on Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:35 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gerard27 Advocate
Joined: 04 Jan 2004 Posts: 2377 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks aCOSwt.
Just emerged it because upgrading world today wanted me to downgrade to 325.15 which won't run on kenel 3.12.2.
Gerard. _________________ To install Gentoo I use sysrescuecd.Based on Gentoo,has firefox to browse Gentoo docs and mc to browse (and edit) files.
The same disk can be used for 32 and 64 bit installs.
You can follow the Handbook verbatim.
http://www.sysresccd.org/Download |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aCOSwt Bodhisattva
Joined: 19 Oct 2007 Posts: 2537 Location: Hilbert space
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gerard82 wrote: | Thanks aCOSwt.
Just emerged it because upgrading world today wanted me to downgrade to 325.15 which won't run on kenel 3.12.2.
Gerard. |
It's a pleasure Gérard.
I always stick to the release Nvidia recommends for my device here : http://www.nvidia.com/Download/Find.aspx?lang=en-us
Hey... just rechecked... it was 304.1160 a couple of days ago... it just jumped to 319.76
Not in portage yet... and don't really know if I will swap considering all the problems I am experiencing with > 319.49 _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ulenrich Veteran
Joined: 10 Oct 2010 Posts: 1480
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aCOSwt wrote: | it just jumped to 319.76
Not in portage yet... and don't really know if I will swap considering all the problems I am experiencing with > 319.49 | Vote for https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493160 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
frank9999 n00b
Joined: 20 Feb 2013 Posts: 61 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
My Systems:
Portage 2.2.7 (default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde, gcc-4.7.3, glibc-2.16.0, 3.12.2-gentoo x86_64)
KDE 4.11.3
GPU Laptop: 460M
Workstation: GTX 680
100% Identical Software on both machines.
My test results:
331.20 (Patched to work with Kernel 3.12) -> Sometimes short high CPU usage peaks from X, no other problems!
325.15 (Patched to work with Kernel 3.12) -> High CPU load from X, "Zombi" processes, strange system behavior, unexpected delays from time to time
319.76 (unpatched, not available via portage) -> High CPU load, drawing errors from time to time, unexpected delays from time to time, 2x application crashed
Identical results on the laptop and workstation!
Result version 331.20 is my choice. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ulenrich Veteran
Joined: 10 Oct 2010 Posts: 1480
|
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps interesting output, as it is stated signal mask related:
Code: | $ for i in $(grep SigBlk /proc/*/status| grep -v 00000000000) ; do \
[ -f ${i/status*}cmdline ]&&cat ${i/status*}cmdline||echo -e "\nSigBlk $i\n";done
/sbin/systemd
SigBlk 7be3c0fe28014a03
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd--user
SigBlk 7be3c0fe28014a03
kdeinit4: kded4 [kdeinit]
SigBlk 00007ffe3e397090
kdeinit4: krunner [kdeinit]
SigBlk 00007ffe3e397e30
kdeinit4: dolphin [kdeinit] --icon system-file-ma
SigBlk 00007ffe3e397ca0
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
SigBlk fffffffe7ffbfeff
$ zcat /proc/config.gz |grep CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT
CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT=y
CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3=y
| That is nvidia-drivers-319.76, Linux-3.12.3rc1, Bfs, glibc-2.17, systemd-208
I don't feel affected. But I don't run nepomuk,akonadi etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Atmmac Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 17 Oct 2013 Posts: 130 Location: Watertown, MA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have been using 331-20 since they came out on KDE with no problems. 325-15 doesn't even build on 3.12.2. This threw me for a loop today. I would recommend unmasking. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TomWij Retired Dev
Joined: 04 Jul 2012 Posts: 1553
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can indeed confirm that those config variables cause a difference, the new workaround is thus to either downgrade to ~x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-325.25 or alternatively set CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT=n CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3=n in the kernel .config; I'm now trying to see if a specific kernel version introduced this. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aCOSwt Bodhisattva
Joined: 19 Oct 2007 Posts: 2537 Location: Hilbert space
|
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aCOSwt wrote: | gerard82 wrote: | Thanks aCOSwt.
Just emerged it because upgrading world today wanted me to downgrade to 325.15 which won't run on kenel 3.12.2.
Gerard. |
It's a pleasure Gérard.
I always stick to the release Nvidia recommends for my device here : http://www.nvidia.com/Download/Find.aspx?lang=en-us
Hey... just rechecked... it was 304.1160 a couple of days ago... it just jumped to 319.76
Not in portage yet... and don't really know if I will swap considering all the problems I am experiencing with > 319.49 |
zOMG!
I rechecked for my 9800GT...
Updated on dec 6th...
Back to... the trees ! :
! 173.1439 !
I think it's the one I started with. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|