View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mreff555 Apprentice
Joined: 10 Mar 2011 Posts: 231 Location: Philadelphia
|
Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 10:56 pm Post subject: Convince me to use another WM |
|
|
So I'm installing Gentoo on a new machine. I'm trying to pick a new WM.
I'm somewhat of a minimalist, but at the same time it's always nice to have something that looks good.
For years I used Openbox. It requires a bit of setup work, but the end product was fast, elegantly simple and pleasing to the eye. Also, very few dependencies which I liked. I used it in conjunction with the tint2 bar, which was somewhat ugly but functional and fast.
I switched to i3 because I was bored and kept hearing how awesome it is. For the most part I like it a lot. Probably about as fast as Openbox. The tiling WM is a learning curve but pretty nice once you get used to it. Very useful on a laptop since the mouse isn't really needed. I really hate the i3 bar however. It is really funny about it's syntax and tends to break by itself for no apparent reason.
That's not my reason for switching. I'm just looking for new things to try. If nothing else I'll just go back to openbox. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
olek Apprentice
Joined: 22 Oct 2011 Posts: 173
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
You could try awesome or dwm. _________________ https://plaintext.blog |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ant P. Watchman
Joined: 18 Apr 2009 Posts: 6920
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm using E17 right now. It's a bit RAM-heavy with compositing turned on (~100MB RSS) but it feels fast and lightweight instead of like a full DE. There's a tiling mode, but it's configurable per-workspace instead of all-or-nothing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mreff555 Apprentice
Joined: 10 Mar 2011 Posts: 231 Location: Philadelphia
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm..... All three options sound interesting. I actually ran enlightenment for a short time in the 90's Thats the last time I used it. Maybe I should give it another try. I've also heard a lot of good about awesome.
Does anyone have an opinion as to how awesome relates to i3? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Doctor Moderator
Joined: 27 Jul 2010 Posts: 2678
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 4:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
If the i3 bar is the only thing you don't like, why not ditch the bar and keep the wm? There is no reason why you have to use dmenu or the i3bar.
If you don't mind overlays, clfswm is a decent tiling window manager and has some nice lispy features. _________________ First things first, but not necessarily in that order.
Apologies if I take a while to respond. I'm currently working on the dematerialization circuit for my blue box. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
amospalla n00b
Joined: 08 Mar 2013 Posts: 26
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been using awesome for 3 or 4 years, until last month, when I moved to i3. I'm not having any problems with i3bar, altough I do feed it with conky.
Awesome is an automatic tiling wm, you don't need to setup workspaces like with i3, you just open clients, and tell awesome which window layout to use, and it arranges them automatically. I moved to i3 because it is more flexible with windows distribution.
One main and obvious difference between them, is awesome doesn't have stacked or tabbed layout, I open lots of windows, and end using more workspaces with awesome (this is the main reason I switched to i3).
Awesome seems to be developed with the idea of being a framework to build your own wm, it has a complete and very well documented API. where you can access to every single aspect of it. It's configuration file is written in lua, a very simple (but complete) scripting language, where you can modify every behaviour. It is the more elastic wm I've ever seen, but with a very sane and completely useful default config which you can use with almost no modification. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mreff555 Apprentice
Joined: 10 Mar 2011 Posts: 231 Location: Philadelphia
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I thought about that, and started searching for something that would work better. The problem is that if I'm not mistaken dmenu depends on the i3bar. dmenu is one of my favorite things about i3. I have key combos set up to start more common programs, but the rest I can just use dmenu, and as opposed to a run command I only need to know part of the file name.
Honestly I should probably try messing with i3bar again. I have never had so much trouble with a config file before and I just got sick of messing with it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
olek Apprentice
Joined: 22 Oct 2011 Posts: 173
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dmenu does not depend on i3bar
Code: | * dependency graph for x11-misc/dmenu-4.5-r3
`-- x11-misc/dmenu-4.5-r3 ~amd64
`-- x11-libs/libX11-1.6.2 (x11-libs/libX11) ~amd64
`-- x11-libs/libXft-2.3.1-r1 (x11-libs/libXft) ~amd64
`-- x11-libs/libXinerama-1.1.3 (x11-libs/libXinerama) ~amd64
`-- virtual/pkgconfig-0 (virtual/pkgconfig) amd64 |
Using it right now, never messed with i3bar. _________________ https://plaintext.blog |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lost+found Guru
Joined: 15 Nov 2004 Posts: 509 Location: North~Sea~Coa~s~~t~~~
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FVWM-Crystal!
Fvwm-Crystal, the return.
Last edited by lost+found on Sun Oct 20, 2013 8:50 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gorkypl Guru
Joined: 04 Oct 2010 Posts: 444 Location: Kraków, PL
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tiling WM's are reaslly the way to go, but discouraging i3 due to its bar is funny at least. Go with dzen and dmenu and enjoy i3.
I have tried most of tiling WMs, and in my opinion i3 and awesome are probably the best ones if you do not need something very specific (like a WM written in Haskell ). Among these two awesome seems to be better in handling multi monitor setups (I mean more than two monitors), due to screen-specific list of tags. If I have beenworking on one screen, I'd probably be using i3. _________________ BTW, TWM FTW! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GFCCAE6xF Apprentice
Joined: 06 Aug 2012 Posts: 295
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Awesome has been my TWM of choice for quite some time. I'm not going to try convince you to use it though, your best bet is to get a list of TWM that sound good to you and use each one for a few days or so and see which one you like best at the end - if you get stuck between two or more then it's time to fork/write your own |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mv Watchman
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Posts: 6747
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lost+found wrote: | FVWM-Crystal! |
Just tried it, and the first impression is very good. Unfortunately, it needs a lot of customization and minor fixes to be as useful as vanilla fvwm (I replied in the thread you cited since it makes perhaps sense to keep the discussion about details to fvwm-crystal there). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
1clue Advocate
Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 2569
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just out of curiosity, what's wrong with vanilla fvwm and a really nice config?
Edit: I was an fvwm user years back, I just recently realized it's still active and have been meaning to give it a try one of these weekends. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mv Watchman
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Posts: 6747
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1clue wrote: | Just out of curiosity, what's wrong with vanilla fvwm and a really nice config? |
There's nothing wrong with it except you have to do everything manually: It is a time issue.
I was hoping that with FVWM-Crystal I could get all the modern faildesktop.org stuff for free (e.g. support for laptop and things), but actually it did not even honour ~/.config/autostart (and the acpi stuff display crashed after 5 seconds with a segfault). At least you get a nice menu. But since it does not really follow the standard there occur things like listing /usr/bin/flock (which probably almost everybody has from util-linux as a web-browser
I will remain with my ancient fvwm configuration (beginnings originating to redhat 5 or so...) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
1clue Advocate
Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 2569
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You and I might be of an age. It seems to me redhat 5 came out a bit after I started with redhat. Back before the IPO and its miracle stock market antics launched Linux into the public eye. I THINK it was around 1996 or maybe 1995.
Anyway, it seems you prefer to start with fvwm rather than crystal, that's good to know. Your complaints about ~/.config/autostart and faildesktop.org are for crystal or for stock fvwm?
I'm sorry, but I've been following your thread since it started, I'm interested in the recommendations for my own purposes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mv Watchman
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Posts: 6747
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1clue wrote: | Your complaints about ~/.config/autostart and faildesktop.org are for crystal or for stock fvwm? |
It's the same for both: You do not get support for the new "standards" (neither with stock fvwm nor with crystal) unless you write it by yourself.
For somebody who has no configuration to start with, I do not know what to recommend: crystal makes use of some nice features of fvwm but also hides other features and is simply unprofessionally written (see my comments in the other thread). It seems that it is a similar problem with fvwm as with zsh: Both can do a lot, but without configuring it you cannot see their power. And it is hard to find a reasonable configuration somewhere. (Except of course the one-and-only zshrc which you can find in the mv overlay ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
olek Apprentice
Joined: 22 Oct 2011 Posts: 173
|
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, something that comes back to my mind: I couldn't get tearing-less video playback with awesome.
Hadn't time to debug that and also I was about to switch to dwm anyways where there were no problems with that.
Can awesome-users confirm working/ not working tearingless videos? Sorry if that is to OT _________________ https://plaintext.blog |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mv Watchman
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Posts: 6747
|
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just for the records: With the patches I attached to the other thread, fvwm-crystal is perhaps really an alternative.
Edit: Removed comments about slowdown, since I described in the patches how to fix it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|