View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
are Apprentice
Joined: 03 Jan 2006 Posts: 188
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:05 am Post subject: Paludis: failed SHA512 on all packages |
|
|
Dear All,
since the last upgrade paludis/cave fails verification of all files, e.g.
Code: | Checking 'google-chrome-beta_25.0.1364.97-r183676_amd64.deb'... failed SHA512
Checking 'google-chrome-libudev-0.13.1-amd64.tar.xz'... failed SHA512 |
I deleted the content of /var/paludis/dist and resynched several times already, nothing helped. Furthermore PORTAGE works at the same time well with the same packages/manifests.
Please do you have any idea?
Best regards! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
are Apprentice
Joined: 03 Jan 2006 Posts: 188
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Update on that: I solved it partially by re-installing paludis using portage:
After re-installing paludis/cave and sha512-verification worked again -- until I did a new
Code: |
cave resolve installed-packages -x
|
which broke sha512-verification again! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hypnos Advocate
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 2889 Location: Omnipresent
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
FWIW, I cannot reproduce your problem -- the checksums are found valid on my machine with paludis-1.0.0 .
You might want to ask the Paludis developers. _________________ Personal overlay | Simple backup scheme |
|
Back to top |
|
|
are Apprentice
Joined: 03 Jan 2006 Posts: 188
|
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
The problem still exists, even after installing paludis-1.2.0.
If I build paludis with "emerge -1 paludis", it it will work and after I can build all other packages with"cave resolve ...".
If I build paludis with "cave resolve paludis -x1", it will work BUT AFTER I can not build anything with "cave resolve ..." as check-sums are found invalid. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hypnos Advocate
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 2889 Location: Omnipresent
|
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm ... I am also using paludis-1.2.0, which was installed using paludis-1.0.0 -- no problems.
Of course, your choice of package manager should have no effect on the function of the package that was installed with it. All Portage and Paludis do are calculate package dependencies, then execute some scripts with some additional sanity checks. Your bug is very strange.
If you are serious about solving the problem you should inquire to the Paludis developers. _________________ Personal overlay | Simple backup scheme |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|