View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
toralf Developer
Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 3925 Location: Hamburg
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:53 pm Post subject: [solved] eix-test-obsolete complains about stable KDE |
|
|
packages - I get : Code: | # eix-test-obsolete -H brief
No non-matching entries in /etc/portage/package.keywords.
No non-matching entries in /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords.
No non-matching entries in /etc/portage/package.mask.
No non-matching entries in /etc/portage/package.unmask.
No non-matching or empty entries in /etc/portage/package.use.
No non-matching or empty entries in /etc/portage/package.env.
No non-matching or empty entries in /etc/portage/package.license.
No non-matching or empty entries in /etc/portage/package.cflags.
The names of all installed packages are in the database.
No redundant entries in /etc/portage/package.{,accept_}keywords
No uninstalled entries in /etc/portage/package.{,accept_}keywords
No redundant entries in /etc/portage/package.mask
No uninstalled entries in /etc/portage/package.mask
No redundant entries in /etc/portage/package.unmask
No uninstalled entries in /etc/portage/package.unmask
Skipping check: redundant entries in /etc/portage/package.use
Skipping check: uninstalled entries in /etc/portage/package.use
Skipping check: redundant entries in /etc/portage/package.env
No uninstalled entries in /etc/portage/package.env
No redundant entries in /etc/portage/package.license
No uninstalled entries in /etc/portage/package.license
Skipping check: redundant entries in /etc/portage/package.cflags
Skipping check: uninstalled entries in /etc/portage/package.cflags
Installed packages with a version not in the database (or masked):
[I] kde-base/attica (4.9.5(4)[?]@01/02/2013): Open Collaboration Services provider management
[I] kde-base/dolphin (4.9.5(4)[?]@01/02/2013): A KDE filemanager focusing on usability
[I] kde-base/dolphin-plugins (4.9.5(4)[?]@01/02/2013): Extra Dolphin plugins
[I] kde-base/drkonqi (4.9.5(4)[?]@01/02/2013): KDE crash handler, gives the user feedback if a program crashed
[I] kde-base/freespacenotifier (4.9.5(4)[?]@01/02/2013): A module that monitors free disk space on the home dir
[I] kde-base/kactivities (4.9.5(4)[?]@01/02/2013): KDE Activity Manager
[I] kde-base/kalzium (4.9.5(4)[?]@01/02/2013): KDE: periodic table of the elements.
[I] kde-base/kate (4.9.5(4)[?]@01/02/2013): Kate is an MDI texteditor.
| anybody else experienced this at a x86 system ?
Update: Yes, I run eix-update before and I'm using eix-sync always
Last edited by toralf on Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:27 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mv Watchman
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Posts: 6749
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:13 pm Post subject: Re: eix-test-obsolete suddenly complains about stable KDE |
|
|
toralf wrote: | [I] kde-base/attica (4.9.5(4)[?]@01/02/2013): |
The [?] means that you installed the package from an overlay which is not available anymore.
Either ignore this message or reinstall the package from a location which is currently available on your system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
toralf Developer
Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 3925 Location: Hamburg
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:18 pm Post subject: Re: eix-test-obsolete suddenly complains about stable KDE |
|
|
mv wrote: | toralf wrote: | [I] kde-base/attica (4.9.5(4)[?]@01/02/2013): |
The [?] means that you installed the package from an overlay which is not available anymore.
Either ignore this message or reinstall the package from a location which is currently available on your system. | yeah,added via laman thre KDE overlay and removed it after the packages were aailable in mainline repository too - so 'I'll have to ignore those lines till the next KDE version :-/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mv Watchman
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Posts: 6749
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The message is correct, because you do not know whether the ebuild of your installed package matches that from the tree. (E.g. different patches might apply if you reinstall the package from the main tree). If you are sure that the applied patches are identical, you can also cheat and pretend that you installed from the "gentoo" repository by editing the corresponding files in /var/db/pkg/*/*/repository. However, if this causes breakage you keep the pieces |
|
Back to top |
|
|
toralf Developer
Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 3925 Location: Hamburg
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mv wrote: | The message is correct, because you do not know whether the ebuild of your installed package matches that from the tree. (E.g. different patches might apply if you reinstall the package from the main tree). If you are sure that the applied patches are identical, you can also cheat and pretend that you installed from the "gentoo" repository by editing the corresponding files in /var/db/pkg/*/*/repository. However, if this causes breakage you keep the pieces | It would be really cool if eix would check in such cases whether the ebuild differs (except comments on so on) or not - but probably a boring coding task |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mv Watchman
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Posts: 6749
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Even if the ebuild is the same, the used eclasses or patches might contain different code. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|