Hope and [Climate] Change

pjp · Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:49 am Post subject:

POTUS obviously can't change policy, though he could have railroaded Kyotobama through.
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008

big dave · Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:51 am Post subject:

stop posting this. you're going to clue them in on the one true plan...

big dave · Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:52 am Post subject:

pjp · Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:56 am Post subject:

Unless they have no real interest in change, then I'm skeptical it could be done through the EPA.
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008

aidanjt · Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 4:05 am Post subject:

But thank God we stopped nuclear, because then we'd have a 'real' problem!
_________________

sikpuppy · Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 4:41 am Post subject:

The real cause of climate change.

aidanjt · Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 5:41 am Post subject:

Bones McCracker · Veteran Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1580 Location: U.S.A.

pjp · Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:30 pm Post subject:

energyman76b · Advocate Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 2042 Location: Germany

Bones McCracker · Veteran Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1580 Location: U.S.A.

Yes, that's right. Solar and wind-power are even worse. Do you have any idea how much carbon is produced in the manufacture and erection of a single wind turbine or array or solar collectors? There is only one solution: we must sterilize two-thirds of the human race at once.

Voltago · Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 9:10 pm Post subject:

Bones McCracker · Veteran Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1580 Location: U.S.A.

aidanjt · Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:42 am Post subject:

aidanjt · Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:49 am Post subject:

Bones McCracker · Veteran Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1580 Location: U.S.A.

It's their own fault. If Japan hadn't got all Imperial-Racist and tried to take over half the world, we wouldn't have had to nuke them (rather than send hundreds of thousands more of our boys to their deaths), and then they wouldn't have developed this hysteria about nuclear disasters, giant mutating creatures, and schoolgirl pedophilia.

aidanjt · Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 5:31 am Post subject:

For me, it boils down to this, when you brush the hysteria aside, you're far more likely to die in an aviation accident, than a nuclear disaster. Statistically nuclear industry is the safest in the world.
_________________

Bones McCracker · Veteran Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1580 Location: U.S.A.

And the people ranting the loudest about it are typically the ones having promiscuous and unprotected sex.

Dominique_71 · Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 9:03 pm Post subject:

Bones McCracker · Veteran Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1580 Location: U.S.A.

Voltago is a climate change Denier :lol:

pjp · Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:19 am Post subject:

Bones McCracker · Veteran Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1580 Location: U.S.A.

Chernobyl will be causing cancer long after our current civilization has fallen, through the next dark age, through the next civilization, after its subsequent dark age, and in all probability, after the extinction of humanity. That still doesn't mean nuclear energy should be shunned.

pjp · Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:49 am Post subject:

I disagree. And at the end of the day, it amounts to who has the numbers. Personally the waste issue is my main concern, giving the benefit of the doubt to the "disasters are now impossible" claim. I don't believe the latter, but it is moot until the waste issue is resolved.
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008

aidanjt · Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:50 am Post subject: