View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
e3k Guru
Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 515 Location: Quantum Flux
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jd823592 wrote: | e3k wrote: | are you sure about font-bitstream-100dpi for me there is no change after installing that font. | did you restart X? made it load the font directory? | thanks Chiitoo i take your noob status and you get my tuxs little helper.
steam running now at my place until the server kicks me.
what is an enrolled account?
--edit--
i asked steam to enroll my account _________________
Flux & Contemplation - Portrait of an Artist in Isolation
Last edited by e3k on Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:57 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chiitoo Administrator
Joined: 28 Feb 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Here and Away Again
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seems like there might be a bug regarding offline/online modes.
I tried to re-start Steam in offline mode, and it did (if I remember right, it was not today), but then it of course popped up the no-no box, and closed itself. Now when I launch Steam, “SteamUpdater: Error: Steam needs to be online to update, but was set to offline mode.” happens, and the program stops. _________________ Kindest of regardses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hyper_Eye Guru
Joined: 17 Aug 2003 Posts: 462 Location: Huntsville, AL.
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chiitoo wrote: | I have been meaning to buy the Penumbra series as well as Amnesia for Linux ever since I discovered that there are native Linux versions of them. I guess I don't need to do it any longer, though the games run fine via Wine, so the main reason for it would have been just to support them guys for supporting Linux...
I guess I can still do that, but I digress. |
I tried all of the Penumbra titles and they do not work. They are all available on Desura though. _________________ Gentoo Gaming Videos |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hasufell Retired Dev
Joined: 29 Oct 2011 Posts: 429
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
penumbra linux installer works fine
there is also an ebuild in sunrise overlay. (I might import it into the main tree when I have time since I own the collection myself) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chiitoo Administrator
Joined: 28 Feb 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Here and Away Again
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, I thought I read from lists that Penumbra was one of those that worked (via Steam, that is).
In any case, tried some other demos, I wonder if others have the same results. I think it was Trine and Cogs, or Waveform, or Darwinia, that would install seemingly fine, but when trying to launch them, they'd take me to the title's store-page, where it would pop up the “you're not welcome here” message.
Wondering why they would take me to that page.
Two of those did that, and two of them didn't install properly.
Need to look into it more after some Zzz hunting... _________________ Kindest of regardses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kriz Apprentice
Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 231
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
got it working but:
Code: |
This version of Steam is currently in closed beta.
Login with an enrolled account to continue.
|
--edit--
i asked steam to enroll my account
sry 4 waste time and space _________________ There is nothing in the desert... and no man needs nothing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spacelike n00b
Joined: 15 Sep 2011 Posts: 61
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kriz wrote: | got it working but:
Code: |
This version of Steam is currently in closed beta.
Login with an enrolled account to continue.
|
--edit--
i asked steam to enroll my account
sry 4 waste time and space |
You can get around this by running steam with ./steam.sh steam://store
gives full access to the client, but if you try to download TF2 it will say "servers busy" even though they aren't, because you're not allowed to download it.
It's up to you if you want to use this or not but from everything I've been seeing from valve I find it very unlikely that they mind. They have had several opportunities to block us out or at least say something to the community and haven't.
Not to mention the fact that all of those Unity Ubuntu users have this workaround built right into the icon for steam, all those users have to do is rightclick the icon and select store. There is no way valve is going to start banning accounts for that.
For these reasons I've been using the client even though I'm not a beta tester. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hasufell Retired Dev
Joined: 29 Oct 2011 Posts: 429
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spacelike wrote: | banning accounts for that. |
even if they would ban people, it might just be invalid, cause there is nothing in the EULA about this particular topic
so they either block us or not. I can run "steam.sh" with whatever additional command line options I like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mackal Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 04 Aug 2011 Posts: 92
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hasufell wrote: | spacelike wrote: | banning accounts for that. |
even if they would ban people, it might just be invalid, cause there is nothing in the EULA about this particular topic
so they either block us or not. I can run "steam.sh" with whatever additional command line options I like. |
Quote: | Me: is Valve going to do anything to the people exploiting the bug to run it on a non-beta account?
Valve Employee: no. it's valid data. |
But, that is just what they thinks. I'm also not going to do it just in case they are wrong.
Also, Quote: | Valve Employee: so just band together 400 people, and I'm sure we'll be booting yet another virtual machine |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Desti² Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 Posts: 127
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just bought SS3, but it's only rendering a black screen, with both 304 and 310 drivers.
*Edit*
Got it to work. It was the setting MAX 3D RENDERING MPIX, which should not be set lower than the screen resolution. _________________ Linux Users Everywhere @ climateprediction.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anyc Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 31 May 2004 Posts: 119
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FYI, I just committed the splitted ebuilds to gamerlay overlay http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/gamerlay.git;a=summary. Ebuild development happens at https://github.com/anyc/steam-overlay.
I moved away from the single ebuild approach and split it up into 3 ebuilds: steam-installer (contains only installer related information), steam-client-meta (pulls in dependencies for the client) and steam-meta (that depends on the previous two). I think this makes it easier to maintain and test things. In the steam-meta ebuild, we could also integrate conditional dependencies for game or engine ebuilds. I'm not part of the beta, so I couldn't test game-related stuff. What do you think? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hasufell Retired Dev
Joined: 29 Oct 2011 Posts: 429
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the install script is still not posix compliant. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spacelike n00b
Joined: 15 Sep 2011 Posts: 61
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Desti² wrote: | I just bought SS3, but it's only rendering a black screen, with both 304 and 310 drivers.
*Edit*
Got it to work. It was the setting MAX 3D RENDERING MPIX, which should not be set lower than the screen resolution. |
BTW, I was talking with the quoted person above in the steam linux group chat. He solved his own problem, the solution was to set the "max 3d rendering mpix" size to the same (or higher?) as the games screen resolution. Just mentioning it in case anyone else has the same problem. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
skaveria n00b
Joined: 23 Nov 2011 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm getting the following error: Code: | Installing breakpad exception handler for appid(steam)/version(1352503901_client) |
LD_DEBUG="libs" ./steam shows Code: | /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.3/32/libstdc++.so.6: error: version lookup error: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found |
Any ideas on what to do? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chiitoo Administrator
Joined: 28 Feb 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Here and Away Again
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
skaveria wrote: | I'm getting the following error: Code: | Installing breakpad exception handler for appid(steam)/version(1352503901_client) |
|
Not an error as far as I know (or at least not a fatal one).
skaveria wrote: | LD_DEBUG="libs" ./steam shows Code: | /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.3/32/libstdc++.so.6: error: version lookup error: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found |
Any ideas on what to do? |
See post 7179392:
.maverick wrote: | gcc-4.6 is needed (two of the libraries demand GLIBCXX_3.4.15 in libstc++) |
Though, I switched (active one) back to 4.5 after installing 4.6, and it still works, so I'm still unsure if one simply needs it installed or actually being used... gotta try when I have the time for it I guess. But since it's not source we can build it from, I'm thinking one simply needs it installed?
Obviously I haven't looked into what it does with it. ^^; _________________ Kindest of regardses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
skaveria n00b
Joined: 23 Nov 2011 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know this is probably a really stupid question but how do I go from the 20120520 version of xlibs to the 20121028 one?
Emerge shows 20121028 as the latest version but when I try to install it always goes back to the 20 version. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chiitoo Administrator
Joined: 28 Feb 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Here and Away Again
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
skaveria wrote: | I know this is probably a really stupid question but how do I go from the 20120520 version of xlibs to the 20121028 one?
Emerge shows 20121028 as the latest version but when I try to install it always goes back to the 20 version. |
Try app-portage/eix for more informative searches. ^^;
The package app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20121028 is still masked as 'unstable', so you would have to unmask it.
- http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs?arches=linux
- http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml?part=3&chap=3
Also, the only stupid question in my opinion is the one that you do not ask. _________________ Kindest of regardses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
skaveria n00b
Joined: 23 Nov 2011 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not sure exactly what I'm doing wrong, I have the testing branch enabled and it still will not obtain the 1028 version.
emerge -s shows Code: | app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs
Latest version available: 20121028
Latest version installed: 20120520
Size of files: 2,425 kB
Homepage: http://dev.gentoo.org/~pacho/emul.html
Description: Provides precompiled 32bit libraries
License: FTL GPL-2 MIT
|
My make.conf has Code: | ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" |
/etc/portage/package.use has Code: | =app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20121028 |
And the output from eix Code: | app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs
Available versions: 20120520^s (~)20121028^s {{development opengl}}
Installed versions: 20120520^s(11:39:59 AM 11/12/2012)(opengl -development)
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
anyc Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 31 May 2004 Posts: 119
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
skaveria wrote: |
My make.conf has Code: | ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" |
|
Afaik, you should not do this.
Quote: |
/etc/portage/package.use has Code: | =app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20121028 |
|
This should go into /etc/portage/package.keywords
[/quote] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anyc Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 31 May 2004 Posts: 119
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hasufell wrote: | the install script is still not posix compliant. |
Hm, is there a tool to test this? I only checked for errors or warnings. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hasufell Retired Dev
Joined: 29 Oct 2011 Posts: 429
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
empanyc wrote: | hasufell wrote: | the install script is still not posix compliant. |
Hm, is there a tool to test this? I only checked for errors or warnings. |
you can at least check for bashisms with dev-util/checkbashisms
and fix the shebang ofc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anyc Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 31 May 2004 Posts: 119
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="empanyc"] skaveria wrote: |
My make.conf has Code: | ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" |
|
Afaik, you should not do this.
[quote]
Ah sorry, mixed it up. One should not use this on the command line. Ignore my comment. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anyc Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 31 May 2004 Posts: 119
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hasufell wrote: | empanyc wrote: | hasufell wrote: | the install script is still not posix compliant. |
Hm, is there a tool to test this? I only checked for errors or warnings. |
you can at least check for bashisms with dev-util/checkbashisms
and fix the shebang ofc |
I'll try that, thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hasufell Retired Dev
Joined: 29 Oct 2011 Posts: 429
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mh, am I the only one missing a tray icon? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spacelike n00b
Joined: 15 Sep 2011 Posts: 61
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hasufell wrote: | mh, am I the only one missing a tray icon? |
Nope, lots of people are. Even ubuntu users.
I was talking to someone who said it seems that only 32-bit unity users will see the tray icon 100% of the time, and it has to do with libappindicator for unity.
Apparently if you are using unity on a 64-bit machine you can install the 32-bit and still see the tray icon. I am wondering if it is possible to get it working in openbox because I don't want to install unity dependencies. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|