View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
yellowhat Guru
Joined: 10 Sep 2008 Posts: 528
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IvanMajhen Guru
Joined: 10 Jun 2006 Posts: 392 Location: Croatia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Copy libpepflashplayer.so and manifest.json somewhere.
Edit /etc/chromium/default with your pepperflash path:
CHROMIUM_FLAGS="--ignore-gpu-blacklist --ppapi-flash-path=/put_your_pepper_flash_path_here".
Disable npapi flash in chrome://plugins/.
YT says that i have accelerated video rendering. This is on gma950 with gallium3d. I think that opengl 2.0 is minimum for acceleration, which i915g supports.
Flash has never been so smooth on linux like with pepper flash.
You could also copy libpdf.so to /usr/lib/chromium-browser/ for pdf support.
This is tested on chromium x86 20.0.1132.43. It reports that i hava flash 11.3*.
It would be nice if gentoo had ebuild for this or use flags. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
floppymaster Developer
Joined: 07 Jul 2010 Posts: 229 Location: Detroit, MI, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting... I did not know about that --ppapi-flash-path parameter. I'll have to try that out. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yellowhat Guru
Joined: 10 Sep 2008 Posts: 528
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for reply, for me worked adding "--ppapi-flash-path=/home/vasco/Images/libpepflashplayer.so" to chromium flags |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yellowhat Guru
Joined: 10 Sep 2008 Posts: 528
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It would be great to have an ebuild for pepper flash instead of adobe flash |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IvanMajhen Guru
Joined: 10 Jun 2006 Posts: 392 Location: Croatia
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
How is performance? Do you get accelerated video? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yellowhat Guru
Joined: 10 Sep 2008 Posts: 528
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
In my opinion pepperflash is a way better, I don't have any more the blue-red problem, and all the browser seems better (can be a mine impression). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
one_and_only Apprentice
Joined: 13 May 2007 Posts: 250 Location: PL/Krakow
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does it work properly for anyone with nvidia twinview setup? I tested it like 3 days ago with both latest and 295* drivers, and in full screen I got something looking like a left-half of the video in the right half of the screen. And no accelerated video decoding too. But aside from that - quite smoth. And you can have full screen video on one screen and do something on the other, to bad that is only a half of the video for me
Last edited by one_and_only on Sat Jun 30, 2012 4:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kernelOfTruth Watchman
Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Posts: 6111 Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IvanMajhen wrote: | Copy libpepflashplayer.so and manifest.json somewhere.
Edit /etc/chromium/default with your pepperflash path:
CHROMIUM_FLAGS="--ignore-gpu-blacklist --ppapi-flash-path=/put_your_pepper_flash_path_here".
Disable npapi flash in chrome://plugins/.
YT says that i have accelerated video rendering. This is on gma950 with gallium3d. I think that opengl 2.0 is minimum for acceleration, which i915g supports.
Flash has never been so smooth on linux like with pepper flash.
You could also copy libpdf.so to /usr/lib/chromium-browser/ for pdf support.
This is tested on chromium x86 20.0.1132.43. It reports that i hava flash 11.3*.
It would be nice if gentoo had ebuild for this or use flags. |
awesome !
seems like this would be tricky to get to run with ~amd64 / x86_64 _________________ https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD/tree/ZFS-for-SysRescCD-4.9.0
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/pulseaudio-equalizer-ladspa
Hardcore Gentoo Linux user since 2004 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
one_and_only Apprentice
Joined: 13 May 2007 Posts: 250 Location: PL/Krakow
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kernelOfTruth wrote: |
awesome !
seems like this would be tricky to get to run with ~amd64 / x86_64 |
just download the lastest google-chrome build for x86_64 (eg. --fetchonly --nodeps), extract it and copy those two files mentioned it the first post. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kimmie Guru
Joined: 08 Sep 2004 Posts: 531 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm... l when I install both google-chrome and chromium, and then configure chromium to use the libpepflashplayer.so installed by google-chrome I see different flash versions reported in chrome://plugins
google-chrome-21.0.1180.57_p148591
Code: | Flash (2 files) - Version: 11.3.31.222
Shockwave Flash 11.3 r31
Name: Shockwave Flash
Description: Shockwave Flash 11.3 r31
Version: 11.3.31.222
Location: /opt/google/chrome/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so
Type: PPAPI (out-of-process)
Name: Shockwave Flash
Version: 11.2 r202
Location: /opt/Adobe/flash-player/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
Type: NPAPI |
vs chromium-21.0.1180.57
Code: | Flash (2 files) - Version: 11.2.999.999
Shockwave Flash 11.2 r999
Name: Shockwave Flash
Description: Shockwave Flash 11.2 r999
Version: 11.2.999.999
Location: /opt/google/chrome/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so
Type: PPAPI (out-of-process)
Name: Shockwave Flash
Version: 11.2 r202
Location: /opt/Adobe/flash-player/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
Type: NPAPI |
Looks like the version reporting is bogus. Flash works fine, and right clicking in a flash plugin window says reports the version as 11.3.31.222 in both browsers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kernelOfTruth Watchman
Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Posts: 6111 Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
one_and_only wrote: | kernelOfTruth wrote: |
awesome !
seems like this would be tricky to get to run with ~amd64 / x86_64 |
just download the lastest google-chrome build for x86_64 (eg. --fetchonly --nodeps), extract it and copy those two files mentioned it the first post. |
I took the "easy" route and installed google-chrome in parallel
a headsup:
Code: | CHROMIUM_FLAGS="--ignore-gpu-blacklist --ppapi-flash-path=/opt/google/chrome/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so" |
worked for me
whereas
Code: | CHROMIUM_FLAGS="--ignore-gpu-blacklist --ppapi-flash-path=/opt/google/chrome/PepperFlash/" |
reported the correct plugin but it wouldn't work - showed an error message
weird _________________ https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD/tree/ZFS-for-SysRescCD-4.9.0
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/pulseaudio-equalizer-ladspa
Hardcore Gentoo Linux user since 2004 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
_artem_ n00b
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ㅤㅤ
Last edited by _artem_ on Fri Sep 02, 2022 6:07 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kimmie Guru
Joined: 08 Sep 2004 Posts: 531 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
_artem_ wrote: | add --ppapi-flash-version='11.3.31.222' to CHROMIUM_FLAGS that will show the correct version of flash |
As history has shown us, decoupling a shared object from its version leads to famine, plague and ass pain for everyone. Ignoring the manifest doesn't seem too clever either. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ZeuZ_NG Guru
Joined: 10 Sep 2008 Posts: 453 Location: Near /dev/urandom | /dev/null
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
So what's the deal then? the bundled with chrome version is preferred over the adobe one still?
Sorry to bump on an old thread. _________________ | Intel Core i7 920. | Intel DX58SO Extreme. |
| 8gb DDR3 1666mHz | 1TB 7200 RPM WD HDD.|
Unix´s guru view of sex:
unzip ; strip ; touch ; grep ; finger ; \
mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; umount ; sleep. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GFCCAE6xF Apprentice
Joined: 06 Aug 2012 Posts: 295
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
ZeuZ_NG wrote: | So what's the deal then? the bundled with chrome version is preferred over the adobe one still?
Sorry to bump on an old thread. |
Personal preference I think.
The chrome one is kept up to date with all other platforms though rather then just security updates.
Also, there a package www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins in tree for pepperflash and chrome pdf if you don't want to download and move stuff manually for chromium. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IceSunrise n00b
Joined: 03 Mar 2008 Posts: 24 Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rorgoroth wrote: | Also, there a package www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins in tree for pepperflash and chrome pdf if you don't want to download and move stuff manually for chromium. |
Thanks a lot for the reference! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|