| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dmitchell
Veteran
Joined: 17 May 2003
Posts: 1159
Location: Austin, Texas
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 2:46 am Post subject: Debate: Obama vs Romney |
 |
|
Topic: Domestic policy
Date: October 3, 9:00 pm EST
Location: Denver, Colorado
_________________
Your argument is invalid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
notageek
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Jun 2008
Posts: 131
Location: MA, USA
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK.
_________________
vivos brunneis vulpes salit super piger canis |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pjp
Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 16225
Location: Colorado
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:31 am Post subject: Re: Debate: Obama vs Romney |
|
|
| dmitchell wrote: | | Topic: Domestic policy |
I'll be curious to hear if the private sector is still dreamy.
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sugar
Guru
Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
When's the science issue debate?
_________________
I call for full employment is a call for war! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dmitchell
Veteran
Joined: 17 May 2003
Posts: 1159
Location: Austin, Texas
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sugar wrote: | | When's the science issue debate? |
Why in the name of fuck would you want to hear politicians debate science? Politicians only have two things to debate: how they are going to fuck foreigners, and how they are going to fuck you.
_________________
Your argument is invalid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bones McCracker
Veteran
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1580
Location: U.S.A.
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Three things: "... and how they are going to make half the population like it and ask for more." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bones McCracker
Veteran
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1580
Location: U.S.A.
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sugar wrote: | | When's the science issue debate? |
Who do you think knows more about science? The guy with the Harvard law degree and a couple years of experience as a social worker, or the guy with the Harvard law degree, Harvard MBA, and about 25 years of actual experience in industry?
Tough call.  : |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wcg
Guru
Joined: 06 Jan 2009
Posts: 588
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 6:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Obama vs Romney vs ?
_________________
TIA |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
notageek
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Jun 2008
Posts: 131
Location: MA, USA
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This debate will be available to everyone because YouTube is going to stream it. Source.
_________________
vivos brunneis vulpes salit super piger canis |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sugar
Guru
Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dmitchell wrote: | | sugar wrote: | | When's the science issue debate? |
Why in the name of fuck would you want to hear politicians debate science? |
because science affects policy, eg energy, agriculture, fisheries and ocean health, public health and biosecurity, food supply issues, natural resource policies etc.
These are the important issues that don't have their own forum.
_________________
I call for full employment is a call for war! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dmitchell
Veteran
Joined: 17 May 2003
Posts: 1159
Location: Austin, Texas
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sugar wrote: | | because science affects policy, eg energy, agriculture, fisheries and ocean health, public health and biosecurity, food supply issues, natural resource policies etc. |
Good reasons to hear scientists debate science. I'm still waiting for a reason to hear politicians debate science.
_________________
Your argument is invalid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
runningwithscissors
Guru
Joined: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 454
Location: the third world
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dmitchell wrote: | | sugar wrote: | | because science affects policy, eg energy, agriculture, fisheries and ocean health, public health and biosecurity, food supply issues, natural resource policies etc. |
Good reasons to hear scientists debate science. I'm still waiting for a reason to hear politicians debate science. |
Politicians control a lot of the money used for scientific research.
_________________
At some stage, the Hindus locked on to the nation destroying concepts like ahimsa (non-violence), shanti (peace), satya (truth) — the ‘ass’ syndrome. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Old School
Apprentice
Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 240
Location: West Bank of the Coast Fork
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 3:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
You people are too young to remember the real debates that were run by the League of Women Voters, not these travesties that are controlled by the two Parties, via a Congressional Committee.
_________________
Irony is asking government to fix the problems it caused |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dmitchell
Veteran
Joined: 17 May 2003
Posts: 1159
Location: Austin, Texas
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| runningwithscissors wrote: | | Politicians control a lot of the money used for scientific research. |
They do indeed, but they also control a lot of the money used for virtually anything you care to name: it doesn't make them expert--or even intelligible--on any particular subject. Case in point.
_________________
Your argument is invalid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pjp
Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 16225
Location: Colorado
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
richk449
Guru
Joined: 24 Oct 2003
Posts: 345
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dmitchell wrote: | | runningwithscissors wrote: | | Politicians control a lot of the money used for scientific research. |
They do indeed, but they also control a lot of the money used for virtually anything you care to name: it doesn't make them expert--or even intelligible--on any particular subject. Case in point. |
What does "expert" or "intelligible" have to do with the question? The fact is that the person elected president will have a large degree of power to influence scientific issues - energy policy (nuclear policy, development of fusion, global warming, electric vehicles), space exploration (manned vs unmanned, solar system exploration versus telescopes), medical science (stem cell research, cloning), etc. Aren't those things that they should be discussing in a public forum? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dmitchell
Veteran
Joined: 17 May 2003
Posts: 1159
Location: Austin, Texas
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| richk449 wrote: | | What does "expert" or "intelligible" have to do with the question? The fact is that the person elected president will have a large degree of power to influence scientific issues - energy policy (nuclear policy, development of fusion, global warming, electric vehicles), space exploration (manned vs unmanned, solar system exploration versus telescopes), medical science (stem cell research, cloning), etc. Aren't those things that they should be discussing in a public forum? |
Absolutely not. I can see it now...
| Quote: | Anderson Cooper: Mr President, you will be representing the side of manned space exploration. Governor Romney, you will be representing the side of unmanned exploration. Mr President, your opening statement, please.
Obama: Herp.
Cooper: And Governor Romney, your response?
Romney: Derp. |
_________________
Your argument is invalid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
notageek
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Jun 2008
Posts: 131
Location: MA, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sugar
Guru
Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dmitchell wrote: | | richk449 wrote: | | What does "expert" or "intelligible" have to do with the question? The fact is that the person elected president will have a large degree of power to influence scientific issues - energy policy (nuclear policy, development of fusion, global warming, electric vehicles), space exploration (manned vs unmanned, solar system exploration versus telescopes), medical science (stem cell research, cloning), etc. Aren't those things that they should be discussing in a public forum? |
Absolutely not. I can see it now...
| Quote: | Anderson Cooper: Mr President, you will be representing the side of manned space exploration. Governor Romney, you will be representing the side of unmanned exploration. Mr President, your opening statement, please.
Obama: Herp.
Cooper: And Governor Romney, your response?
Romney: Derp. |
|
I'm sure their respective offices' can come up with a suitable positions on several scientific issues.
_________________
I call for full employment is a call for war! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
McSwartz
Veteran
Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 1238
Location: ID, USA
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Obama would continue to go for green energy (that's failed) while Romney would probably go for that hypersonic aircraft (that crashed).
_________________
Glock 19 Gen 4
Glock 43 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bones McCracker
Veteran
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1580
Location: U.S.A.
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
The President can ask for all the money he wants, but Congress controls the money.
Obama talked a lot of shit about the Scyents, and that's pretty much what he delivered - Jack Shit. His most significant act was to kill manned space flight.
Go back to the debates of 2007 and listen to all the shit Obama SAYS he's gonna do, then compare it to reality. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sugar
Guru
Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BoneKracker wrote: | The President can ask for all the money he wants, but Congress controls the money.
Obama talked a lot of shit about the Scyents, and that's pretty much what he delivered - Jack Shit. His most significant act was to kill manned space flight.
Go back to the debates of 2007 and listen to all the shit Obama SAYS he's gonna do, then compare it to reality. |
whatever. Where's the science debate?
_________________
I call for full employment is a call for war! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Prenj
n00b
Joined: 20 Nov 2011
Posts: 16
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Moon Unit Zappa did a song with her father about people like that.
_________________
“If You Meet the Buddha on the Road, Kill Him” |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sugar
Guru
Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Prenj wrote: |
Moon Unit Zappa did a song with her father about people like that. |
about people who are trying to stay on topic?
_________________
I call for full employment is a call for war! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
juniper
l33t
Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 759
Location: EU
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dmitchell wrote: | | sugar wrote: | | because science affects policy, eg energy, agriculture, fisheries and ocean health, public health and biosecurity, food supply issues, natural resource policies etc. |
Good reasons to hear scientists debate science. I'm still waiting for a reason to hear politicians debate science. |
indeed. but both candidates should know basic science as their decisions affect a lot of science. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Off the Wall
