View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Joseph_sys Advocate

Joined: 08 Jun 2004 Posts: 2623 Location: Edmonton, AB
|
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:47 pm Post subject: [SOLVED] light weight viewer for pdf file |
|
|
I was always using xpdf but it seems to me nobody maintain it anymore, before the package was masked but now it will be remove.
Code: | - app-text/xpdf-3.02-r4::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> (27 Jan 2012)
# Has developed into an unmaintainable mess, and everyone who
# knows about it is either retired or missing in action.
# Several minor bugs and one ugly security issues (#386271).
# Masked for removal because of lack of maintainer. |
Any recommendation for light-weight pdf viewer (I'm using XFCE4)?
Last edited by Joseph_sys on Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:21 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rsa4046 l33t


Joined: 07 Feb 2005 Posts: 660 Location: The Big H, a bit SSW
|
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you're a vim user, there is apvlv, has mostly poppler and gtk+ dependencies. I think it is pretty light. Evince is not bad, if you have some gnome libs already installed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dr.Willy Guru

Joined: 15 Jul 2007 Posts: 547 Location: NRW, Germany
|
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mupdf |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
avx Advocate


Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 2152
|
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
++ _________________ ++++++++++[>+++++++>++++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>++.>+.+++++++..+++.>++.<<+++++++++++++++.>.+++.------.--------.>+.>. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joseph_sys Advocate

Joined: 08 Jun 2004 Posts: 2623 Location: Edmonton, AB
|
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rsa4046 wrote: | If you're a vim user, there is apvlv, has mostly poppler and gtk+ dependencies. I think it is pretty light. Evince is not bad, if you have some gnome libs already installed. |
I have evince installed, it is OK but xpdf is smaller.
I've tried apvlv and mupdf none of them have any simple menu, can not print. I usually open some pdf document with a browser and print them if I have to but these application don't have any print buttons associated with them, or do they? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nordic bro Guru

Joined: 25 Oct 2003 Posts: 585
|
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it's pretty spartan but I just use emacs so if you already have emacs you woulnd't need to add another pkg although I never need to do anything fancy w/pdf like bookmarking or anything so it might be too simplistic for your needs. its "docview" menu in emacs has a print but I've never tried it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joseph_sys Advocate

Joined: 08 Jun 2004 Posts: 2623 Location: Edmonton, AB
|
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't have emacs, installed so adding it just to view and print pdf files might not be practical.
xpdf is perfect but has no maintainers :-/
Most of the time I need to search document print it, resize it (nothing fancy). I would like to see simple menu on the screen as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hypnos Advocate


Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 2889 Location: Omnipresent
|
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 3:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use evince with the GNOME-related USE flags deactivated -- works fine. Just as light as xpdf, and works better than it ever did for heavy documents and presentations. _________________ Personal overlay | Simple backup scheme |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joseph_sys Advocate

Joined: 08 Jun 2004 Posts: 2623 Location: Edmonton, AB
|
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hypnos wrote: | I use evince with the GNOME-related USE flags deactivated -- works fine. Just as light as xpdf, and works better than it ever did for heavy documents and presentations. |
Yes, evince is very good package; I think I'll start using it instead of xpdf
Last edited by Joseph_sys on Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:37 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jimmij Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 02 Dec 2008 Posts: 139
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How about updating the package instead of removing it?
http://www.foolabs.com/xpdf/index.html tells that the newest xpdf is 3.03 but in portage last is 3.02, and according to http://www.foolabs.com/xpdf/CHANGES many fixes have been implemented since 3.02. _________________ Vanitas vanitatum et omnia vanitas.
Libera temet ex inferis. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yngwin Retired Dev


Joined: 19 Dec 2002 Posts: 4572 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It would still need somebody willing to maintain it. _________________ "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
Free Culture | Defective by Design | EFF |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
smartass Apprentice

Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Posts: 189 Location: right behind you ... (you did turn around, didn't you?)
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightweight ? app-text/zathura ... vim-like UI, is fast, has search, fullscreen, just a 116K binary.
Do you need more ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lost-distance n00b

Joined: 10 Apr 2003 Posts: 73
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
smartass wrote: | Do you need more ? |
Yes, a conventional GUI interface!
Zathura is a useful GTK application that feels somewhat encumbered by a primitive curses-like interface. Users expecting a conventional GUI document viewer will not want to use it, which is a shame. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yngwin Retired Dev


Joined: 19 Dec 2002 Posts: 4572 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you want a light-weight PDF viewer with a nice GUI, then look at app-text/epdfview (GTK+) or app-text/qpdfview (Qt). _________________ "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
Free Culture | Defective by Design | EFF |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lost-distance n00b

Joined: 10 Apr 2003 Posts: 73
|
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the suggestions.
I have used epdfview for years, but it is becoming ever less reliable, as noted in this thread. For example, it is very slow to page through some files, and more recently the content simply disappears when I try to zoom within other files.
I would like to investigate qpdfview, but it is currently marked as unstable for amd64, and it uses the Qt toolkit which is otherwise absent on my system (not a fatal problem, just annoying). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
slpfrafjellene n00b

Joined: 30 Dec 2012 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 9:56 am Post subject: Evince without GNOME |
|
|
Hypnos wrote: | I use evince with the GNOME-related USE flags deactivated -- works fine. Just as light as xpdf, and works better than it ever did for heavy documents and presentations. |
Hi. I am also considering installing Evince, but I also don't want GNOME-related functionality. Could you provide the USE flag you used? Or would -gnome satisfy? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hypnos Advocate


Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 2889 Location: Omnipresent
|
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:12 pm Post subject: Re: Evince without GNOME |
|
|
slpfrafjellene wrote: | Hi. I am also considering installing Evince, but I also don't want GNOME-related functionality. Could you provide the USE flag you used? Or would -gnome satisfy? |
Here are my USE flag settings:
Code: | dbus -debug djvu dvi -gnome -gnome-keyring introspection -nautilus postscript -t1lib tiff |
_________________ Personal overlay | Simple backup scheme |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
_______0 Guru

Joined: 15 Oct 2012 Posts: 521
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
does this one count???
pdftotext
Code: | ls -sh /usr/bin/pdftotext
28K /usr/bin/pdftotext |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|