| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tgR10
Apprentice
Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 262
Location: caly ten ambaras
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shining Arcanine
Veteran
Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 1110
|
 Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 1:49 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| How did you install GCC 4.4.4? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ormaaj
Guru
Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 319
|
| Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| phajdan.jr wrote: | | hallabro wrote: | | I get this error when compiling source from latest trunk (r48000). I guess it's related to the recent VP8 implementation or something (maybe a missing configure flag?). |
Please file a bug. This way it'll be easier to track. |
bug 321159
It could be as simple as a missing include but I don't have time to play with it right now. It'd be nice to be able to do a rebuild since I've been out of town and broke my last chromium build due to libpng stupidness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tgR10
Apprentice
Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 262
Location: caly ten ambaras
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BK201
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 14 Dec 2008
Posts: 83
Location: Ohio
|
| Posted: Tue May 25, 2010 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chromium continues to randomly fail to load my profiles and flash is also not working atm. Youtube gives me a message that I need to upgrade to the latest version of flash but I already have the latest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phajdan.jr
Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1777
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Tue May 25, 2010 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BK201 wrote: | | chromium continues to randomly fail to load my profiles |
That looks serious. What is the exact error message and how it looks like? Is it related to unclean shutdowns or something like that? Which filesystem are you using?
_________________
http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BK201
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 14 Dec 2008
Posts: 83
Location: Ohio
|
| Posted: Tue May 25, 2010 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Heres the error dialog
http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/1817/201005251111351024x768s.png
It's been a few weeks since this last happened, deleting the profile folder is the only way to fix the error. It seems that the only thing that is lost when it fails to load the profile though is autofill, browsing history, etc and not my browser settings. I am using etx4 with relatime mount option. As far as I can tell this is not occurring from improper shutdown although I do frequently suspend to S3 via tuxonice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phajdan.jr
Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1777
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Tue May 25, 2010 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BK201 wrote: | Heres the error dialog
http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/1817/201005251111351024x768s.png
It's been a few weeks since this last happened, deleting the profile folder is the only way to fix the error. It seems that the only thing that is lost when it fails to load the profile though is autofill, browsing history, etc and not my browser settings. I am using etx4 with relatime mount option. As far as I can tell this is not occurring from improper shutdown although I do frequently suspend to S3 via tuxonice. |
Thanks. The suspending indeed may have some influence here.
Let me quote the dialog text here for reference:
| Quote: |
Your profile could not be opened correctly. Some features may be unavailable. Please check that the profile exists and you have permission to read and write its contents.
|
Here's a way you can really help the project, and hopefully get this fixed: back up your profile at the moment it gets corrupted. Then file a new bug on http://new.crbug.com/ (use the Linux template). Provide all info from here, and say you can upload the corrupted profile after the bug is made private. Feel free to PM me the bug link so I can apply needed labels etc.
_________________
http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tomk
Bodhisattva
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 7221
Location: Sat in front of my computer
|
| Posted: Tue May 25, 2010 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moved from Unsupported Software to Other Things Gentoo now that it's in the Portage tree.
_________________
Search | Read | Answer | Report | Strip |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oschtan
n00b
Joined: 27 Dec 2008
Posts: 71
Location: Russia, Novosibirsk
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:17 pm Post subject: Cups??? |
|
|
/usr/portage/www-client/chromium/chromium-6.0.427.0.ebuild
| Code: | IUSE=""
RDEPEND="app-arch/bzip2
>=dev-libs/libevent-1.4.13
dev-libs/libxml2
dev-libs/libxslt
>=dev-libs/nss-3.12.3
>=gnome-base/gconf-2.24.0
>=media-libs/alsa-lib-1.0.19
media-libs/jpeg:0
media-libs/libpng
media-video/ffmpeg[threads]
>=net-print/cups-1.3.5
sys-libs/zlib
>=x11-libs/gtk+-2.14.7
x11-libs/libXScrnSaver" |
What added cups??? And installing it on USE impossible? Cups I do not want in the system ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kingoftherings
Guru
Joined: 04 May 2008
Posts: 328
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
My search bar suddenly stopped working. I can enter URLs fine, but if I try to do a Google search, it does nothing.
The problem appeared after I updated to 6.0.427, but I even downgraded to 5.0.375.70, and the problem persists.
I even unmerged chromium and deleted ~/.config/chromium and ~/.cache/chromium, and as far as I could tell there were no other chromium related files to delete.
The really weird part is the search bar in Firefox hasn't worked for me in months. Even after reemerging it for updates and all that.
Am I suddenly missing a library? I use KDE4, so maybe I don't have some GTK stuff?
This is one of the most bizarre bugs I've seen. I've never had this issue in Chrome or Firefox on any other system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phajdan.jr
Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1777
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kingoftherings wrote: | My search bar suddenly stopped working. I can enter URLs fine, but if I try to do a Google search, it does nothing.
The problem appeared after I updated to 6.0.427, but I even downgraded to 5.0.375.70, and the problem persists. |
If you're using GCC 4.5, that's what happens. It seems to be a bug in GCC.
_________________
http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6111
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| phajdan.jr wrote: | | Kingoftherings wrote: | My search bar suddenly stopped working. I can enter URLs fine, but if I try to do a Google search, it does nothing.
The problem appeared after I updated to 6.0.427, but I even downgraded to 5.0.375.70, and the problem persists. |
If you're using GCC 4.5, that's what happens. It seems to be a bug in GCC. |
++
strange thing is:
when using chromium on Arch it works (I'm sure it wasn't compiled with gcc 4.5 on arch - they're probably using the binary)
I moved back to Gentoo & it went on working - after several days later it stopped again !
so that problem is pretty hard to tackle 
_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD/tree/ZFS-for-SysRescCD-4.9.0
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/pulseaudio-equalizer-ladspa
Hardcore Gentoo Linux user since 2004  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kingoftherings
Guru
Joined: 04 May 2008
Posts: 328
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| phajdan.jr wrote: | | Kingoftherings wrote: | My search bar suddenly stopped working. I can enter URLs fine, but if I try to do a Google search, it does nothing.
The problem appeared after I updated to 6.0.427, but I even downgraded to 5.0.375.70, and the problem persists. |
If you're using GCC 4.5, that's what happens. It seems to be a bug in GCC. |
Yep, I'm using GCC 4.5. That sucks.
But I'm pretty sure I recompiled Chromium a couple weeks ago when I first installed the new GCC when I did emerge -e world
I guess I'll just switch to chromium-bin since I don't want to install a second GCC just for chromium. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6111
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ant P.
Watchman
Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 6920
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:56 pm Post subject: Re: Cups??? |
|
|
| Oschtan wrote: | | What added cups??? And installing it on USE impossible? Cups I do not want in the system ... |
Me neither. WTF is going on there? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ant P.
Watchman
Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 6920
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alright, I've hacked CUPS out into a useflag and compiling it now. Will post patches later if it works.
edit: it works!
| Code: | --- gentoo/www-client/chromium/chromium-6.0.427.0.ebuild 2010-06-11 11:07:28.000000000 +0100
+++ local/www-client/chromium/chromium-6.0.427.0.ebuild 2010-06-15 01:19:38.164301706 +0100
@@ -14,5 +14,5 @@
SLOT="0"
KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~arm ~x86"
-IUSE=""
+IUSE="cups"
RDEPEND="app-arch/bzip2
@@ -26,5 +26,7 @@
media-libs/libpng
media-video/ffmpeg[threads]
- >=net-print/cups-1.3.5
+ cups? (
+ >=net-print/cups-1.3.5
+ )
sys-libs/zlib
>=x11-libs/gtk+-2.14.7
@@ -63,4 +65,9 @@
epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-gyp-fixes-r1.patch
+ if ! use cups; then
+ # Disable printing - CUPS dependency
+ epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-disable-print.patch
+ fi
+
remove_bundled_lib "third_party/bzip2"
remove_bundled_lib "third_party/libevent" |
| Code: | local/www-client/chromium/files/chromium-disable-print.patch
--- chrome/chrome.gyp.orig 2010-06-15 01:15:25.366254785 +0100
+++ chrome/chrome.gyp 2010-06-15 01:15:37.501427224 +0100
@@ -1011,21 +1011,6 @@
'../build/linux/system.gyp:gtk',
],
}],
- ['OS=="linux" and chromeos==0 and target_arch!="arm"', {
- 'link_settings': {
- 'libraries': [
- '-lcups',
- ],
- },
- 'defines': [
- # CP_PRINT_SYSTEM_AVAILABLE disables default dummy implementation
- # of cloud print system, and allows to use custom implementaiton.
- 'CP_PRINT_SYSTEM_AVAILABLE',
- ],
- 'sources': [
- 'service/cloud_print/printer_info_cups.cc',
- ],
- }],
],
},
],
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Shining Arcanine
Veteran
Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 1110
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Would you file an enhancement request at the Gentoo Linux bug tracker? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phajdan.jr
Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1777
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ant_P wrote: | Alright, I've hacked CUPS out into a useflag and compiling it now. Will post patches later if it works.
edit: it works! |
Nice work! I'm sure either me or voyageur will apply these patches. I usually don't update the existing ebuilds to save time on compile-testing, but the next dev channel release has a good chance of getting this. Oh, and then my plan is to take these changes upstream, so we don't have to apply custom patches, and can just flip a configure flag.
If you could file a bug (bugs.gentoo.org) that would make things easier to track.
_________________
http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ant P.
Watchman
Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 6920
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Here you go, bug 324105 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6111
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Shining Arcanine
Veteran
Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 1110
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Only partially:
| Quote: | | AdBlock 2.0 blocks resources that match your several thousand subscribed filter rules and any of your custom filter rules; basically, doing what it's always done but now preventing the download. A downside to this is that occasionally I've seen a resource sneak by before the rules were loaded. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6111
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Shining Arcanine wrote: |
Only partially:
| Quote: | | AdBlock 2.0 blocks resources that match your several thousand subscribed filter rules and any of your custom filter rules; basically, doing what it's always done but now preventing the download. A downside to this is that occasionally I've seen a resource sneak by before the rules were loaded. |
|
ah - well,
any improvement in that direction is speeding up & improving the experience even if that means 2 steps forward and 1 step back 
thanks for the clarification Shining Arcanine !
_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD/tree/ZFS-for-SysRescCD-4.9.0
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/pulseaudio-equalizer-ladspa
Hardcore Gentoo Linux user since 2004 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Shining Arcanine
Veteran
Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 1110
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Any time.
If you are interested, there is an open issue at the AdBlock For Chrome bug tracker dedicated to discussing ways of fixing/working around this:
http://code.google.com/p/adblockforchrome/issues/detail?id=3614
I perused AdBlock For Chrome's files and made some suggestions for how it can do quick processing based on the design of its filters, which would not eliminate the issue, but it would minimize it (and possibly make chrome with adblocking faster). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hallabro
n00b
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 24
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anyone managed to build latest trunk without pulling in gnome-keyring? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Other Things Gentoo
